SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Administrators’ and Teachers’ Perceptions regarding the Selection Method and Qualifications of School Administrators

Administrators' and Teachers' Perceptions regarding the Selection Method and Qualifications of School Administrators

Mehmet ŞÜKRÜ BELLİBAŞ
Cemil BOZKURT
Pages
46–74
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, participants expressed some concerns regarding the transparency and justice of selection process but considered variation in the selection criteria to be positive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The assessment, selection and assignment of principals working at public schools in Turkey have continued to be problematic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to examine the perceptions of principals and teachers regarding the recent change in the selection method and the qualifications of school administrators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, participants expressed some concerns regarding the transparency and justice of selection process but considered variation in the selection criteria to be positive.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The assessment, selection and assignment of principals working at public schools in Turkey have continued to be problematic. The purpose of this study is to examine the perceptions of principals and teachers regarding the recent change in the selection method and the qualifications of school administrators. The study depends on a phenomenology approach of qualitative research. A semi-structured interview approach was employed in the collection and analysis of the data. According to the results, participants expressed some concerns regarding the transparency and justice of selection process but considered variation in the selection criteria to be positive. It is indicated that principals appointed to schools through the current system are determined to develop a team spirit and a positive school culture. In addition, it is suggested that in-service training provided to principals for their development should be practice-based.

🔖

Cite This Article

BELLİBAŞ, M. Ş., BOZKURT, C. (2022). Administrators’ and Teachers’ Perceptions regarding the Selection Method and Qualifications of School Administrators. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 46–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/428366

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ada, Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2012). The reflection of instructional leadership concept on educational administration master’s programs: A comparison of Turkey and the United State of America. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 462-474.
  2. Akın, U. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin seçimi ve yetiştirilmesi: Türkiye ve seçilmiş ülkelerden farklı uygulamalar, karşılaştırmalar. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2), 1-30.
  3. Altınkurt, Y. & Yılmaz, K. (2010). Değerlere göre yönetim ve örgütsel adalet ilişkisinin ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 16 (4), 463-484.
  4. Aslanargun, E. (2012). Okul müdürlerini sahip olması gereken değerler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 1327-1344.
  5. Arabaci, İ. B., Şanli, Ö., & Altun, M. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilme ve atama yöntemlerine ilişkin sendika temsilcilerinin, maarif müfettişlerinin ve okul yöneticilerinin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(31), 166-186.
  6. Balcı, A. (2008). Türkiye’de eğitim yönetiminin bilimleşme düzeyi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 14(2), 181-209.
  7. Bolat, S. (1996). Eğitim örgütlerinde iletişim: HÜ Eğitim Fakültesi uygulaması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(12), 75-80.
  8. Bridges, E. (1967). Instructional leadership: A concept re-examined. Journal of Educational Administration, 5(2), 136–147.
  9. Brieve, F. J. (1972). Secondary principals as instructional leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 56(368), 11-15.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  11. Pegem Yayınları.
  12. Cemaloğlu, N. (2005). Türkiye’de okul yöneticisi yetiştirme ve istihdamı varolan durum, gelecekteki olası gelişmeler ve sorunlar. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 237-252.
  13. Çelik, V. (1998). Eğitimde dönüşümcü liderlik. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 4(4), 423-442.
  14. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–24
  15. Goldman, H. & Heald, J. E. (1968). Teacher expectations of administrative behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 4(3) 29-40.
  16. Gonzalez, M. (2012). Mindful leadership: The 9 ways to self-awareness, transforming yourself, and inspiring others. Ontaria, Canada: John Wiley & Sons. Gümüş, E., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2015). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Kanada’da okul müdü