SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1

The Effect of the Self-Regulated Intervention Package on the Writing Skills of Students with Learning Disabilities

Öz Düzenlemeli Müdahale Paketinin Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencinin Yazma Becerilerine Etkisi

Mustafa Ceylan(ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1922-0161
Pages
471–501
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings were discussed within the framework of the literature, and recommendations were made.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined the effect of a self-regulation intervention package on the writing skills of a student with learning disabilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, self-regulation strategies were employed to support the student's writing behaviors in terms of narrative elements, paper layout and punctuation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings were discussed within the framework of the literature, and recommendations were made.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:öğrenme güçlüğü · yazma güçlüğü. · öykü yazma

Abstract

This study examined the effect of a self-regulation intervention package on the writing skills of a student with learning disabilities. To this end, self-regulation strategies were employed to support the student's writing behaviors in terms of narrative elements, paper layout and punctuation. A multiple baseline design across behaviors, one of the single-subject research models, was employed. Story maps, fading prompts, direct instruction and self-regulation strategies were employed to encourage the acquisition of the target behaviors. The results reveal that the participant's behaviors relating to writing texts appropriate to story elements, creating texts appropriate to paper layout and writing texts using punctuation marks increased. The acquisition processes for the targeted behaviors lasted four sessions for writing texts appropriate to story elements, six sessions for writing texts appropriate to paper layout and ten sessions for writing texts using punctuation marks. The findings were discussed within the framework of the literature, and recommendations were made.

Özet

Çalışmada öz düzenlemeli müdahale paketinin öğrenme güçlüğü olan bir öğrencinin yazma becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda öğrenme güçlüğü olan bir altıncı sınıf öğrencisinin öykü unsurlarına, kâğıt düzenine ve noktalama işaretlerine uygun metin yazma davranışlarının desteklenmesinde öz düzenleme stratejilerinin kullanımına yer verilmiştir. Araştırma modeli olarak tek denekli araştırma modellerinden davranışlar arası çoklu başlama modeli kullanılmıştır. Katılımcının öykü unsurlarına, kâğıt düzenine ve noktalama işaretlerine uygun öykü yazma davranışlarının kazandırılması hedeflenmiştir. Hedef davranışların edindirilmesi için hikâye haritası, ipucunun silikleştirilmesi, doğrudan öğretim ve öz düzenleme stratejileri kullanılmıştır. Hedeflenen davranışların edinilme süreçleri; öykü unsurlarına uygun metin yazma için dört oturum, kâğıt düzenine uygun metin yazma için altı oturum ve noktalama işaretlerine uygun metin yazma için on oturum sürmüştür. Çalışmanın sonuçları çalışmanın katılımcısının öykü unsurlarına uygun metin yazma, kâğıt düzenine uygun metin oluşturma ve noktalama işaretlerini kullanarak metin yazma davranışlarının arttığını ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular alan yazını çerçevesinde tartışılmış ve önerilere yer verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ceylan, M. (2026). The Effect of the Self-Regulated Intervention Package on the Writing Skills of Students with Learning Disabilities. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 471–501. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.1890376

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Aydın, O., & Cavkaytar, A. (2018). Yazma güçlüğü görülen öğrencilerin el yazısı okunaklık düzeylerinin arttırılmasında ipucunun giderek artırılması uygulamasıyla sunulan öğretimin etkililiği. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (36), 1-23.
  2. Barton, E. E., Meadan-Kaplansky, H., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Independent variables, fidelity, and social validity. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology (3rd ed., pp. 133-156). Routledge.
  3. Browder, D. M., Root, J. R., Wood, L., & Allison, C. (2017). Effects of a story-mapping procedure using the iPad on the comprehension of narrative texts by students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615611387
  4. Brownell, M. T., Smith, S. J., Crockett, J. B., & Griffin, C. C. (2012). Inclusive instruction: Evidence-based practices for teaching students with disabilities. Guilford Press.
  5. Chalk, J. C., Hagan-Burke, S., & Burke, M. D. (2005). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing process for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126974
  6. Chen, J., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. M. (2022). Improving EFL students’ text revision with the self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) model. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09280-w
  7. Chenard, M. N. (2014). An evaluation of the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) on improving freshman college students' writing abilities (Yayın No. 3688011) [Doktora tezi, University of Southern Maine]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  8. Combs, M. (2006). Readers and writers in primary grades: A balanced and integrated approach K-4 (3th ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  9. Coşkun, E. (2005). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin öyküleyici anlatımlarında bağdaşıklık, tutarlılık ve metin elementleri (Tez No. 205427) [Doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  10. Fortes, I. S., Paula, C. S., Oliveira, M. C., Bordin, I. A., de Jesus Mari, J., & Rohde, L. A. (2016). A cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of DSM-5 specific learning disorders in representative school samples from the second to sixth grade in Brazil. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0708-2
  11. Garcia Sanchez, J. N., & Fidalgo Redondo, R. (2008). Effects of two types of self-regulated instruction programs on students with learning disabilities in writing products, processes, and self-efficacy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(3), 181-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035506
  12. Gerde, H. K., Bingham, G. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2012). Writing in early childhood classrooms: Guidance for best practices. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(6), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0531-z
  13. Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527238
  14. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying a self-regulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 139-187. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
  15. Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
  16. Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703-1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
  17. Grünke, M. (2021). The POW+TREE strategy’s effects on the argumentative writing of struggling secondary students. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(1), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2021.11.1.27
  18. Guckert, M., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2016). Personalizing research: Special educators’ awareness of evidence-based practice. Exceptionality, 24(2), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2014.986607
  19. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Brookline Books.
  20. Heasty, M., McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, R. L., & Keenan, B. (2012). The effects of using direct instruction mathematics formats to teach basic math skills to a third grade student with a learning disability. Academic Research International, 2(3), 382-387. http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.2(3)/2012(2.3-47).pdf
  21. Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., Cui, J., Smith, M., Bullock Mann, F., Barmer, A., & Dilig, R. (2020). The Condition of Education 2020 (NCES No. 2020-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020144.pdf
  22. İlker, Ö., & Melekoğlu, M. A. (2017). İlköğretim döneminde özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin yazma becerilerine ilişkin çalışmaların incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 18(3), 443-469. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.318602
  23. Johnson, E. S., Hancock, C., Carter, D. R., & Pool, J. L. (2013). Self-regulated strategy development as a tier 2 writing intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(4), 218-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212462880
  24. Koutsoftas, A. D., & Gray, S. (2013). A structural equation model of the writing process in typically-developing sixth grade children. Reading and Writing, 26(6), 941-966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9399-y
  25. Kowalewski, E., Murphy, J., & Starns, M. (2002). Improving student writing in the elementary classroom [Yüksek lisans tezi, Saint Xavier University]. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED467516
  26. Kring, A. M., Johnson, S. L., Davison, G., & Neale, J. (2015). Anormal psikolojisi (M. Şahin, Çev.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  27. Lane, K. L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Weisenbach, J. L., Brindle, M., & Morphy, P. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. The Journal of Special Education, 41(4), 234-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466907310370
  28. Laurice, M. J., Sheila, A. M., & Nancy, N. (2016). Applying behavior analytic procedures to effectively teach literacy skills in the classroom. Psychology in the Schools, 53(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21883
  29. Lienemann, T. O., Graham, S., Jansen, B. L., & Reid, R. (2006). Improving the writing performance of struggling writers in second grade. The Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400020301
  30. Li, D. (2007). Story mapping and its effects on the writing fluency and word diversity of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 77-93. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ797672
  31. Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2018). Tailoring multicomponent writing interventions: Effects of coupling self-regulation and transcription training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417708170
  32. Lupuleac, V. (2014). Physical education for the correction of dysgraphia in primary school pupils. Civilization and Sport, 15(2), 122-126. https://pm3.ro/pdf/56/RO/10%20-%20lupuleac%20122-126.pdf
  33. Martins, M. R. L., Bastos, J. A., Cecato, A. T., Souza Araujo, M. L., Ribeiro Magro, R., & Alaminos, V. (2013). Screening for motor dysgraphia in public schools. Jornal de Pediatria, 89(1), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2013.02.011
  34. Mason, L. H., & Cramer, A. M. (2008). Rarely had the words poured: Teaching persuasive writing. Learning Disabilities Worldwide, 5(2), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.4.4
  35. McKeown, D., FitzPatrick, E., Ennis, R. P., & Sanders, S. (2021). Self-regulated strategy development: A framework for effective instruction across the content areas. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(3), 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12256
  36. McKeown, D., Wijekumar, K., Owens, J., Harris, K., Graham, S., Lei, P., & FitzPatrick, E. (2023). Professional development for evidence-based SRSD writing instruction: Elevating fourth grade outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, Article 102152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102152
  37. Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (2005). Teaching students with learning problems (7th ed.). Pearson.
  38. National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Report on the Condition of Education 2023. https://nces.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/report/compendium/condition-education-2023
  39. Nückles, M., Roelle, J., Glogger-Frey, I., Waldeyer, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). The self-regulation view in writing-to-learn: Using journal writing to optimize cognitive load in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1089–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09541-1
  40. Olinghouse, N. G., & Leaird, J. T. (2009). The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second-and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9124-z
  41. Ozdowska, A., Wyeth, P., Carrington, S., & Ashburner, J. (2021). Using assistive technology with SRSD to support students on the autism spectrum with persuasive writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 934-959. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13063
  42. Öğülmüş, K., & Melekoğlu, M. A. (2021). The impact of POW + C-SPACE strategy on story writing skills of Turkish students with specific learning disabilities. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(1), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.334.16
  43. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
  44. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  45. Rakap, S., Yücesoy-Özkan, Ş., & Kalkan, S. (2020). Tek-denekli deneysel araştırmalarda etki büyüklüğü hesaplama: Örtüşmeyen veriye dayalı yöntemlerin incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 35(85), 40-60.
  46. Ray, A. B., & FitzPatrick, E. (2024). Practice-based professional development for self-regulated strategy development writing instruction with secondary teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 56(4), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599221122888
  47. Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P. L., & Parush, S. (2003). Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 41-81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021371425220
  48. Sazak, E. (2022). Yanlışsız öğretim yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  49. Shora, N. (2015). Write on: The effects of self-regulated strategy development with science prompts on the persuasive writing performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders [Yüksek lisans tezi, Texas A&M University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  50. Sorrell, A. L. (1990). Three reading comprehension strategies: TELLS, story mapping, and QARs. Academic Therapy, 25(3), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129002500310
  51. Stringfield, S. G., Luscre, D., & Gast, D. L. (2011). Effects of a story map on accelerated reader postreading test scores in students with high-functioning autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(4), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357611423543
  52. Swanson, H. L., & Harris, K. R. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  53. Tekin-İftar, E. (2018). Çoklu yoklama modelleri. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Eğitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek denekli araştırmalar içinde (s. 217-255). Anı Yayıncılık.
  54. Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & Lawrence, A. M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 17-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2
  55. Truckenmiller, A., Shen, M., & Sweet, L. E. (2020). The role of vocabulary and syntax in informational written composition in middle school. Reading and Writing, 33(8), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10099-1
  56. Yasul, A. F. (2014). İlkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin öyküleyici metin yazma becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi (Muş ili merkez ilçesi örneği) (Tez No. 368555) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı Tez Merkezi.
  57. Yoder, K. K. (2005). Student talk during the writing process from sixth-graders' perspectives (Yayın No. 3171968) [Doktora tezi, University of San Francisco]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.