Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TECHNOLOGY EXPORT IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE'DE FİKRİ MÜLKİYET HAKLARI KORUMASI EKONOMİK BÜYÜME VE TEKNOLOJİ İHRACATI İLİŞKİSİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ

Pages
61–88
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main purpose of study in this context is to examine how the protection of intellectual property rights in Turkey is related to technology acquisitions, high tech exports and economic growth through basic economic indicators and compare them to the countries where they are competitors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intellectual property rights (IPR) are the rights granted on any economic goods, given to persons over the creations of their minds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because IPR regime, create a positive impact on the economic performance of the country by play an incentive role in encouraging new business development, rationalization of industry, and inducing technology acquisition, creation and exports.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main purpose of study in this context is to examine how the protection of intellectual property rights in Turkey is related to technology acquisitions, high tech exports and economic growth through basic economic indicators and compare them to the countries where they are competitors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPR) are the rights granted on any economic goods, given to persons over the creations of their minds. It can affect economic growth by encouraging technological innovation. Because IPR regime, create a positive impact on the economic performance of the country by play an incentive role in encouraging new business development, rationalization of industry, and inducing technology acquisition, creation and exports. The main purpose of study in this context is to examine how the protection of intellectual property rights in Turkey is related to technology acquisitions, high tech exports and economic growth through basic economic indicators and compare them to the countries where they are competitors.

Özet

Bireylerin akılları ile yarattıkları her hangi bir ekonomik mal üzerine verilen tüm haklar olarak tanımlayabileceğimiz Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları (FHM), teknolojik yeniliği teşvik vasıtasıyla, ekonomik büyümeyi etkileyebilmektedir. Çünkü FMH rejimi; sanayinin yeni iş geliştirme kapasitesinde, rasyonalizasyonunda, teknoloji ediniminde, oluşturulmasında ve ihracatında teşvik edici bir rol oynayarak ülkelerin ekonomik performansı üzerinde pozitif bir etki yaratmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın temel amacı, Türkiye'de fikri mülkiyet hakları korumasının, teknoloji edinimi, yüksek teknoloji ürünleri ihracatı ve ekonomik büyüme arasında nasıl bir ilişki olduğunu temel ekonomik göstergeler üzerinden ele alıp, rakip olduğu ülkelerle karşılaştırılarak farklı bir bakış açısı ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİBER, A. E. (2022). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TECHNOLOGY EXPORT IN TURKEY. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 61–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/426834

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, Samuel (2010). "Intellectual Property Rights, Investment Climate and FDI in Developing Countries". Internatioanl Business Research 3 (3): 201-209.
  2. Carvalho N. Pires (2000). The Trips Regime of Patent Rights. 3th edition, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. Chin, C. Judith ve Grossman, M. Gene (1988). Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade. NBER Working Paper Series No.2769: 1-27.
  3. Coe, T. David, Helpman, Elhanan (1995). "International R&D Spillovers". European Economic Review 39: 859-887.
  4. Coe, T. David, Helpman, Elhanan ve Hoffmaister, W. Alexander (1997). "North-South RveD Spillovers". Economic Journal 107: 134- 49. Correa, M. Carlos (2000). Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries, TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options. 2nd. Edition, London: Zed Boks and Third World Network. Çakmak, Erol ve Gümüş, Sevda (2005). "Türkiye'de Beşeri Sermaye ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz (1960 - 2002)". Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi 60(1): 59- 72. Deardorff, V. Alan (1992). "Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection". Economica 59(233): 35-51.
  5. Demirli, Yunus (2014). "Türkiye'de Teknoparklara Yönelik Teşvikler ve Teknoparkların Bilim ve Teknoloji Kapasitesinin Gelişimine Katkısı". Maliye Dergisi 166: 95-114
  6. Dinopoulos, Elias, Güngöraydınoğlu, Ali ve Syropoulos, Constantinos (2005). Patent Protection and Global Schumpeterian Growth. Globalization: Prospects and Problems. Florida: Florida University (28 - 30 January 2005).
  7. Ekmekçi, Umut ve Ansal, Hacer (2009). "Teknolojik Yetkinliklerin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlardan Bilgi Transferine Etkileri". İTÜ Mühendislik Dergisi 8(4): 37-48.
  8. Falvey Rod, Foster, Neil ve Greenaway, David (2006). "Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth". Review of Development Economics 10(4): 700-719.
  9. Ferrantino, J. Michael (1993). "The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investment". Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129: 300-331.
  10. Gaisford, D. James ve Richardson, R. Stephen (2000). The TRIPS Disagreement: Aboundoned?. Working Papers No 2000-10, University Of Calgary. GATT Traditions Have Been Ginarte, C. Juan ve Park, G., Walter (1997). "Determinants of Patent Rights: A Coss National Study". Research Policy 26: 283-301.
  11. Gould, M. David ve William, C. Gruben (1996). "The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth". Journal of Development Economics 48: 323-350
  12. Grossman, M. Gene. ve Helpman, Elhanan (1991). Innovation and Growth in t