SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 8

Türkiye'de Elektrik Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasında Nedensellik İlişkisi

Causal Relationship Between electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey

Cengiz AKTAŞ
Veysel YILMAZ
Pages
45–54
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and GNP in the short-run, and unidirectional causality running from GNP to electricity consumption exists in the long-run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consumption of electricity has been known in many countries to be correlated with economic activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reasons for increase of electricity demand are higher living standards and industrialization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and GNP in the short-run, and unidirectional causality running from GNP to electricity consumption exists in the long-run.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Consumption of electricity has been known in many countries to be correlated with economic activities. The reasons for increase of electricity demand are higher living standards and industrialization. Like in other developing countries, in Turkey, the demand for energy and electricity is growing rapidly due to social and economic developments and increase of the population of the country. In this paper, the Granger causality between electricity consumption (EC) and Gross National Product (GNP) is examined for Turkey using annual data covering the period 1970-2004. As economic growth and electricity consumption variables used in empirical analysis have same order of integration (I(1)), Granger causality test is employed. In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and GNP in the short-run, and unidirectional causality running from GNP to electricity consumption exists in the long-run.

Özet

Elektrik tüketiminin pek çok ülkede ekonomik aktivitelerle ilişkili olduğu bilinmektedir. Elektiriğe olan talebin sebebi yüksek yaşam standartları ve endüstrileşmedir. Diğer gelişmiş ülkelerde olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de enerjiye ve elektriğe olan yüksek talebin nedeni, ülke nüfusundaki artış ve, sosyal ve ekonomik gelişmelerin hızla artmasındandır. Bu makalede, Türkiye’nin 1970-2004 dönemindeki yıllık verilerle elektrik tüketimi ve GSMH arasındaki nedensellik araştırıldı. Yapılan analiz sonunda elektrik tüketimi ve GSMH değişkenleri aynı derecede (I(1)) bütünleşik olduklarından Granger nedensellik testi uygulandı. Çalışmada, kısa dönemde elektrik tüketimi ve GSMH arasında iki yönlü nedensellik, uzun dönemde ise GSMH’dan elektrik tüketimine tek yönlü bir nedensellik bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAŞ, C., YILMAZ, V. (2022). Türkiye'de Elektrik Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasında Nedensellik İlişkisi. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 8, 45–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/426093

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adjaye, John A. (2000), “The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices And Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence From Asian Developing Countries”, Energy Economics, No. 22, pp. 615-625.
  2. Akarca, Ali T. and Thomas V. Long (1980), “On The Relationship Between Energy And GNP: A Re-Examination”, Journal of Energy and Development, No. 5, pp. 326-331.
  3. Chang, Tsangyao, Wenshwo Fang and Li-Fang Wen (2001), “Energy Consumption, Employment, Output And Temporal Causality: Evidence From Taivan Based On Cointegration And Error-Correction Modelling Techniques”, Applied Economics, No. 33, pp. 1045- 1056. Dickey, David A., Dennis W. Jansen and Daniel L. Thornton (1991), “A Primer On Cointegration With An Application To Money And Income”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, March/April, pp. 58–78.
  4. Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution Of The Estimators For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root”, Journal of American Statistical Association, No. 74, pp. 427-431.
  5. Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics For Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root”, Econometrica, No. 49, pp. 1057-1072.
  6. Dua, Pami and B.L. Pandit (2002), “Interest Rate Determination In India:Domestic And External Factors”, Journal of Policy Modeling, No. 24, pp. 853–875.
  7. Engle, Robert F. and Clive W. J. Granger (1987), “Cointegration And Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, And Testing”, Econometrica, No. 55, pp. 251–276.
  8. Erol, Umit and Eden S.H. Yu (1987), “Time Series Analysis Of The Causal Relationships Between US Energy And Employment”, Resources Energy, No.9, pp. 75-89.
  9. Granger, Clive W.J., (1981), “Some Properties Of Time Series Data And Their Use In Econometric Model Specification”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 121– 130. Granger, Clive W.J. (1983), “Co-Integrated Variables And Error-Correcting Models”, Economics Department Discussion Paper, University of California, San Diego, pp. 83– 113. Granger, Clive W.J. (1988), “Some Recent Developments In A Concept Of Causality”, Journal of Econometrics, No. 39, pp. 199– 211. Granger, Clive W.J. and Paul Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regressions In Econometrics”, Journal Econometrics, No. 2, pp. 111-120.
  10. Ghosh, Sajal (2002), “Electricity Consumption And Economic Growth In India”, Energy Policy, No. 30, pp. 125–129.
  11. Johansen, Soren (1991), “Estimation And Hypothesis Testing Of Cointegration Vectors In Gaussian Vector Autoregression Models”, Econometrica, No. 59, pp.