Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of factors relating with early period complications that develop following application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Pages
182–186
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prevention of early complications in patients with PEG can increase the quality of life of patients by preventing complications that may occur in the long term, while also reducing hospital costs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method which is preferred for nutrition in patients who need long-term enteral nutrition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent PEG process in our clinic between years of 2014 and 2020 are included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prevention of early complications in patients with PEG can increase the quality of life of patients by preventing complications that may occur in the long term, while also reducing hospital costs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method which is preferred for nutrition in patients who need long-term enteral nutrition. In this procedure which seems to be simple technically, complications which can form following the process can give rise to serious results. In this study, it has been aimed to examine the factors relating with complications observed in early period following PEG process. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent PEG process in our clinic between years of 2014 and 2020 are included in the study. Patients are divided into two groups within the first period of 30 days depending on whether complication has developed or not. Factors that could be related with complications in groups and long-term results in patients relating with whom complications developed are analyzed retrospectively. Results: One hundred and six patients were included in our study. In the group with early complications, long-term complications (30.8% vs. 6.3% p=0.001), catheter dysfunction (19.2% vs. 3.8% p=0.009), and withdrawal of the PEG tube (11.5% vs. 0% p=0.002) were found to be more frequent at a significant level statistically. Conclusion: None of the parameters evaluated in our study alone were associated with PEG complications. In patients with early PEG complications, the rate of complications, catheter dysfunction, and withdrawal of the PEG catheter increased in the long term. Prevention of early complications in patients with PEG can increase the quality of life of patients by preventing complications that may occur in the long term, while also reducing hospital costs.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, U., SÖZÜER, E. M., AKYÜZ, M., AKYILDIZ, H. Y., KÜLTÜROĞLU, M. O., DAL, F., TALİH, T. (2022). Evaluation of factors relating with early period complications that develop following application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 182–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/423553

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Hucl T, Spicak J. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016;30:769–81
  2. Akıcı M, Erşen O, Celik G, Cilekar M. Experiences with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a general surgery clinic. Med J SDU 2019;26:234–8
  3. Pih GY, Na HK, Hong SK, Ahn JY, Lee JH, Jung KW, et al. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the surgical intensive care unit. Clin Endosc 2020;53:705– 12
  4. Itkin M, DeLegge MH, Fang JC, McClave SA, Kundu S, d’Othee BJ, et al. Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal access for enteral nutrition and decompression from the society of ınterventional radiology and American gastroenterological association (AGA) ınstitute, with endorsement by Canadian ınterventional radiological association (CIRA) and cardiovascular and ınterventional radiological society of Europe (CIRSE). J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22:1089– 106
  5. Demirci H, Kilciler G, Öztürk K, Kantarcioglu M, Uygun A, Bagci S. Our experience in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;23:73–6
  6. Rahnemaiazar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: İndications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:7739–51
  7. Miranda LE, Penha MR, Miranda AC, Lima DL, Costa MW, Amorim AO. Risk factors associated with early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients at a tertiary care center in Brazil: A retrospective single-center survival study. Arq Gastroenterol 2019;56:412–8
  8. Ates O, Kart Y, Hakguder G, Olguner M, Aslan N, Ozturk Y, et al. Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi deneyimlerimiz. Çoc Cer Derg 2006;20:170–3
  9. Cinar H, Akalin C, Ozdemir O. Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. Ann Med Res 2019;26:148–51
  10. Strijbos D, Keszthelyi D, Gilissen LP, Lacko M, Hoeijmakers JG, Leij C, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic versus radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: A retrospective analysis on outcomes and complications. Endosc Int Open 2019;7:1487– 95
  11. Park SK, Kim JY, Koh SJ, Lee YJ, Jang HJ, Park SJ. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic and radiologic gastrostomy tube insertion: A KASID (Korean association for the study of ıntestinal diseases) study. Surg Endosc 2019;33:750–6
  12. Guzzo JL, Bochicchio GV, Haan J, Bochicchio K, Kole K, Scalea TM. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in ICU patients with previous laparotomy. Am Surg