SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

The Effect of Removed Squares and Flowers of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): I. Changes in Yield, Earliness and Fiber Properties

Tuncay DEMİRBİLEK
Abdulhabip ÖZEL
Pages
199–208
Publication Date
2016-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Not any fiber quality parameters were affected by removals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of squares (flower-bud) and flowers removal on yield and fiber quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were tested.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Field trials were conducted on research field of Harran University Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops in years of 1998 and 1999, at southeastern of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Not any fiber quality parameters were affected by removals.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Removal genarative organs · yield distribution · monopodium branches

Özet

In this study, the effects of squares (flower-bud) and flowers removal on yield and fiber quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were tested. Field trials were conducted on research field of Harran University Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops in years of 1998 and 1999, at southeastern of Turkey. Field trials were arranged in completely randomized block design with four replications. The Sayar 314 cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) variety was used as plant material. Squares were removed at first two weeks of squaring (SR1-2) and flowers were removed throughout first to tenth week of flowering with two weeks interval (FR1-2, FR3-4, FR5-6, FR7-8, FR9-10) and check plot. At the end of variance analysis it was indicated that cotton could compensate for generative organs losses at early stage (SR1-2 and FR1-2) despite dramatically yield reduction at mid-flowering losses (FR3-4 and FR5-6, 21.11% and 10.49% in 1998 and 22.05% and 12.28% in 1999, respectively). Late removals (FR7-8 and FR9-10) have not significant effect on yield. Not any fiber quality parameters were affected by removals.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBİLEK, T., ÖZEL, A. (2016). The Effect of Removed Squares and Flowers of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): I. Changes in Yield, Earliness and Fiber Properties. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 199–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/423445

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahmed, F.M. and Abdel-Al, M.H., 1988. Effect of defoliation treatments on cotton yield. Annals of Agricultural Science Cairo, 33(2), 941-950.
  2. Aviram, N. and Rimon, D., 1980. Effect of cumulative flower removal on the development and yield of cotton plants. Special Publication, Division of Scientific Publication, Bet-Dagan, No.158, 21pp. Cook, D.R. and Kennedy, C.W., 2000. Early flower bud loss and mepiquat chloride effects on cotton yield distribution. Crop Science, 40,1678-1684.
  3. Demirbilek, T. and Özel, A., 1999.
  4. Pamukta Silkme, Nedenleri ve Fizyolojisi. HR.Ü. Z.F. Dergisi, 3 (1-2):57-66.
  5. Deshmukh, RK., Rao, M.R.K. and Bhale, N.L., 1988. Effect of desinking on the expression of production potential in raingrown cotton. Journal of the Indian Society for Cotton Improvement, 13(1), 60-62.
  6. Dinç, U., Şenol, M., Sayın, S. and Güzel, N., 1988. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Toprakları I. Harran Ovası. TÜBİTAK Tarım ve Ormancılık Araştırma Projesi Kesin Raporu, Proje No: TOAG-534, Adana. Eid, A.A.H., 1973. Effect of early defruiting on Egyptian cotton. Mededeligen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent., 38(1), 15-22.
  7. Guinn, G., 1985. Abscisic acid and cutout in cotton. Plant Physiology, 77, 16-20.
  8. Guinn, G.; Brummett, D.L., 1992. Influence of defruiting on the abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid contents of cotton leaves. Field Crops Research, 28(3), 257-262.
  9. Heitholt, J.J., 1993. Cotton boll retention and its relationship to lint yield. Crop Science, 33, 486-490.
  10. Heitholt, J.J., 1997. Floral bud removal from specific fruiting positions in cotton: Yield and fiber quality. Crop Science, 37, 826-832.
  11. Holman, E.M. and Oosterhuis, D.M., 1999. Cotton photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in response to floral bud loss due to insect damage. Crop Science, 39, 1347-1351.
  12. Jones, M.A., Wells, R. and Guthrie, D.S., 1996a. Cotton response to seasonal patterns of flower removal: I. Yield and fiber quality. Crop Science, 36, 633-638.
  13. Jones, M.A., Wells, R. and Guthrie, D.S., 1996b. Cotton response to seasonal patterns of flower removal: II. Growth and dry matter allocation. Crop Science, 36, 639-645.
  14. Karner, M.A., Goodson, J.R., Dugger, P. and Richter, D., 1998. Nodes above white flower: indicator to use to terminate cotton insect scouting and insect control. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Diego, California, USA, 5-9 January, 2:1326-1328.
  15. Mann, J.E., Turnipseed, S.G., Sullivan, M.J., Adler, P.H., Durant, J.A. and May, O.L., 1997. Effects