Journals / Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Nanotechnology in Phytopathology

Fitopatolojide Nanoteknoloji

Pages
296–303
Publication Date
2018-06-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, despite the fact that the use of nanopesticides in the control of plant diseases is based on sponges, it has emerged as a new approach increasing in popularity in recent years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, nanotechnology, which is used in different fields, promises to reduce the use of pesticides, to develop plant and animal breeding, to prevent plant diseases, at the same time to detect disease and to form new nano-bioindustrial products.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It appears that nanofungicides which are produced using very different nanoparticles have considerable advantages when compared to classical formulations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, despite the fact that the use of nanopesticides in the control of plant diseases is based on sponges, it has emerged as a new approach increasing in popularity in recent years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nanoteknoloji · fitopatoloji · nanofungisit

Abstract

In recent years, nanotechnology, which is used in different fields, promises to reduce the use of pesticides, to develop plant and animal breeding, to prevent plant diseases, at the same time to detect disease and to form new nano-bioindustrial products. It appears that nanofungicides which are produced using very different nanoparticles have considerable advantages when compared to classical formulations. In addition, smart release methods are being developed to ensure effective use of pesticides and effective results in disease control. As a result, despite the fact that the use of nanopesticides in the control of plant diseases is based on sponges, it has emerged as a new approach increasing in popularity in recent years.

Özet

Son yıllarda farklı alanlarda kullanılan nanoteknoloji tarımda; zirai ilaç kullanımını azaltma, bitki ve hayvan ıslahı geliştirme, bitki hastalıklarını önlemede, aynı zamanda hastalık tespitinde ve yeni nano-bioendüstriyel ürünler oluşturmada gelecek vaat etmektedir. Çok farklı nanopartiküller kullanılarak üretilen nanofungisitlerin klasik formülasyonlarla karşılaştırıldığında oldukça avantajları olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca pestisitin etkin kullanımı ve hastalık kontrolünde etkili sonuç alınabilmesi için akıllı salım metodları geliştirilmektedir. Sonuç olarak, bitki hastalıkarının kontrolünde nanopestisitlerin kullanımının temelleri eskilere dayanmasına karşın son yıllarda popüleritesi artan yeni bir yaklaşım olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAKAN, A., ÖZKAYA, H. Ö. (2018). Nanotechnology in Phytopathology. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 296–303. https://ajindex.com/articles/423407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abbasian, M., Kashani, A., Ardakani, M.R., Rejali, F., Timajchi, M., Seifi, S.M.,Mafakheri, S., 2012.
  2. The Effects of Chemical, Biological and Nano Fungicides on Mycorrhizal Colonization and Quality of Sunflower. Annals of Biological Research, 3 (8): 4239-4245.
  3. Banik, S., Sharma, P., 2011. Plant pathology in the era of nanotechnology. Indian Phytopathology, 64(2): 120-127.
  4. Borkow, G., Gabbay, J., 2005. Copper as a biocidal tool. Current medicinal chemistry, 12(18): 2163-2175.
  5. Brecht, M.O., Datnoff, L.E., Kucharek, T.A., Nagata, R.T., 2004. Influence of silicon and chlorothalonil on the suppression of gray leaf spot and increase plant growth in St. Augustinegrass. Plant Disease, 88(4): 338-344.
  6. Campos E.V.R., Oliveira J.LD., Fraceto LF., Baljit Singh B., 2015. Polysaccharides as safer release systems for agrochemicals. Agron. Sustain. Dev, 35(1): 47–66.
  7. Chen, L.C., Kung, S.K., Chen, H.H., Lin, S.B., 2010. Evaluation of zeta potential difference as an indicator for antibacterial strength of low molecular weight chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers, 82(1): 913-919.
  8. Chowdappa, P., Shivakumar, G., 2013. Nanotechnology in crop protection: Status and scope. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems, 19(2): 131-151.
  9. Çıracı, S., 2005. Metrenin Bir Milyarda Birinde Bilim ve Teknoloji, Bilim ve Teknik, Ağustos, Ek sayı: 6-10.
  10. Garcia Rincon, J., Vega Perez, J., Guerra Sinchez, M.G., Hernndez Lauzardo, A.N., Peqa Diaz, A., Velizquez Del Valle, M.G., 2010. Effect of chitosan on growth and plasma membrane properties of Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.:Fr.) Vuill. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 97(3): 275-278. González Melendi, P., Fernández Pacheco, R., Coronado, M.J., Corredor, E., Testillano, P.S., Risueño, M.C., Marquina, C., Ibarra, M.R., Rubiales, D., Pérez de Luque, A., (2008). Nanoparticles as Smart Treatment delivery Systems in Plants: Assessment of Different Techniques of Microscopy for their Visualization in Plant Tissues. Annals of Botany, 101(1): 187-195.
  11. Gopal, M., Gogoi, R., Srivastava, C., Kumar, R., Singh, P., Nair, K., Yadav, S., Arunava Goswamı, A., 2011. Nanotechnology and its application in plant protection. “Alınmıştır. Plant Pathology in India: Vision 2030,
  12. Indian Pathology Society, India 224-232pp Govindaraju, K., Tamilselvan, S., Kiruthiga, V., Singaravelu, G., 2010. Biogenic silver nanoparticles by Solanum torvum and their promising antimicrobial activity. Journal of Biopesticides, 3(1): 394-399.
  13. He, L., Liu, Y., Mustapha, A., Lin, M., 2011. Ant