Journals / Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

GENETIC ANALYSES FOR SOME CHARACTERISTICS IN DURUM WHEAT (Triticum durum Desf.)

Pages
17–25
Publication Date
2014-02-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the similarity of parents for the characteristics under study, limited number of sampling, the presence of micro environmental variations resulted in absence of genuine genetic variations or the presence of some undetected genetic parameters depending on inadequacy of basic generations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to assess and use of some genetics factors such as additive, dominance and non allelic interactions affecting generation means and variances for some quantitative characteristics of basic generations [P1, P2, F1 (2 family), F2 (4 family), B1 (4 family) and B2 (4 family)] derived from the cross between Ozberk and Firat-93 cultivars of Triticum durum.
📊
Key Findings & Data:H (dominance) and E (environmental) variations turned out to be significant frequency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the similarity of parents for the characteristics under study, limited number of sampling, the presence of micro environmental variations resulted in absence of genuine genetic variations or the presence of some undetected genetic parameters depending on inadequacy of basic generations.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Wheat · basic generations · heritability

Abstract

This study aimed to assess and use of some genetics factors such as additive, dominance and non allelic interactions affecting generation means and variances for some quantitative characteristics of basic generations [P1, P2, F1 (2 family), F2 (4 family), B1 (4 family) and B2 (4 family)] derived from the cross between Ozberk and Firat-93 cultivars of Triticum durum. Except canopy temperature and SDS sedimentation value, simple additive dominance model (m, [d], [h]) was not found to be adequate to describe generation means indicating the presence of non allelic interactions. Parameters for means of generations obtained from biometrical equations were found to be overlapping partially those of computer software (MEAN FIT). H (dominance) and E (environmental) variations turned out to be significant frequency. Variance components obtained from biometrical equations and computer software (VAR FIT) overlapped. Utilizing from variance components of best fit, h2 n for number of grain spike-1 was only estimated as 18.26 %. The h2 b values were found to be less than 50 % for both estimation methods (formulas and computer software). It was concluded that the similarity of parents for the characteristics under study, limited number of sampling, the presence of micro environmental variations resulted in absence of genuine genetic variations or the presence of some undetected genetic parameters depending on inadequacy of basic generations. Taking into account the presence of epistasis nearly for all characteristics, delay selection is recommended

Özet

This study aimed to assess and use of some genetics factors such as additive, dominance and non allelic interactions affecting generation means and variances for some quantitative characteristics of basic generations [P1, P2, F1 (2 family), F2 (4 family), B1 (4 family) and B2 (4 family)] derived from the cross between Ozberk and Firat-93 cultivars of Triticum durum. Except canopy temperature and SDS sedimentation value, simple additive dominance model (m, [d], [h]) was not found to be adequate to describe generation means indicating the presence of non allelic interactions. Parameters for means of generations obtained from biometrical equations were found to be overlapping partially those of computer software (MEAN FIT). H (dominance) and E (environmental) variations turned out to be significant frequency. Variance components obtained from biometrical equations and computer software (VAR FIT) overlapped. Utilizing from variance components of best fit, h2 n for number of grain spike-1 was only estimated as 18.26 %. The h2 b values were found to be less than 50 % for both estimation methods (formulas and computer software). It was concluded that the similarity of parents for the characteristics under study, limited number of sampling, the presence of micro environmental variations resulted in absence of genuine genetic variations or the presence of some undetected genetic parameters depending on inadequacy of basic generations. Taking into account the presence of epistasis nearly for all characteristics, delay selection is recommended.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, Y., ÖZBERK, İ., COŞKUN, A. (2014). GENETIC ANALYSES FOR SOME CHARACTERISTICS IN DURUM WHEAT (Triticum durum Desf.). Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 17–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/423286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ALI, Y., ATTA, B.M., AKHTER, J., MONNEVEUX, P., LATEEF, Z., 2008. Genetic variability, association and diversity studies in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY 40(5):20872097.
  2. AMAYA, A.A., BUSCH, R.H. and LEBSOCK, K.L., 1972. Genetic effects in durum wheat. Crop Science 12:479-481. ANONYMOUS, 1983. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists (Eight edition). American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. ANONYMOUS, 1991. Genetics simulations for small size populations. GENSIM statistical package. Univ. of Birmingham. UK. ANONYMOUS, 2001. The basic of color preception and measurement. HunterLab Presents, Reston VA, p:56, USA. ANONYMOUS, 2002. JMP® Design of Experiments, Version 5, Copyright by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. ISBN 1-59047-0702. ANONYMOUS, 2009a. TÜİK. www.tuik.gov.tr ANONYMOUS, 2009b. Şanlıurfa Meteoroloji Bölge Müdürlüğü, Şanlıurfa. AUTRAN, J.C. and GALTERIO, G., 1989. Associations between electrophoretic composition of proteins, quality characteristics and agronomic attributes of durum wheats. II. Protein-quality associations. Journal of Cereal Science 9: 195–215.
  3. AYENEH, A., VAN GINKEL M., REYNOLDS, M.P. and AMMAR, K., 2002. Comparison of leaf, spike, peduncle and canopy temprature deppression in wheat under heat stress. Field Crops Research 79: 173-184.
  4. BHATIYA, V.J., JADON, B.S. and PITHIA, M.S., 1987. Gene effects for grain yield and it’s components in durum wheat. Madras Agr. Journal 74(4-5): 258-260.
  5. BILGIN, O., BASER, I., KORKUT, K.Z., GENCTAN, T., BALKAN, A. and SAGLAM., N., 2009. Variations for grain yield and milling value of durum wheat landraces and obsolete cultivars. Philippine Agr. Sci. 92(1):25-32.
  6. CAVALLI, L.L., 1952. In quantitative inheritance (E.C.R. Reave veC.V. Waddington, eds) pp.135144. CHO, N.J., OHM, J.B. and CHUNG, O.K., 2001. Prediction of bread-making properties using itrinsic wheat quality characteristics. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 10: 391-396.
  7. CHOWDHRY, M.A., RAFIG, M. and ALAM, K., 1992. Genetic architecture of grain yield and certain other traits in bread wheat. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 13: 215-220.
  8. CLARKE, F.R., CLARKE, J.M., McCAIG, T.N., KNOX, R.E. and DePAUW, R.M., 2006. Inheritance of yellow pigment concentration in seven durum wheat crosses. Canadian Jour. of Plant Sci. 86(1):133-141.
  9. COLLAKU, A. and HARRISON, S.A., 2005. Heritability of waterlogging tolerance in wheat. Crop Science 45(2): 722-727.
  10. COX, M.C., QUALSET, C.P. and RAINS, D.W., 1985. Genetic