Journals / Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING FROZEN FOOD CONSUMPTION: A CASE STUDY OF SAMSUN, TURKEY

DONDURULMUŞ GIDA TÜKETİMİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN ANALİZİ: SAMSUN İLİ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
15–24
Publication Date
2014-02-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research results also showed that the socio-economic factors such as household size, age of household head, households’ income, household with working wife and the attitudes such as consumers’ health concern, product price and time saving significantly influence consumption of frozen food consumption.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study socio-economic factors and attitudes of consumer influencing frozen food consumption frequencies was aimed to determine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data used in the study was obtained from 185households in Samsun province selected by random sampling using well-described questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research results also showed that the socio-economic factors such as household size, age of household head, households’ income, household with working wife and the attitudes such as consumers’ health concern, product price and time saving significantly influence consumption of frozen food consumption.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dondurulmuş gıda · tüketim · sıralı probit

Abstract

In this study socio-economic factors and attitudes of consumer influencing frozen food consumption frequencies was aimed to determine. Data used in the study was obtained from 185households in Samsun province selected by random sampling using well-described questionnaire. We used an ordered probit approach identifying consumer characteristics and attitudes thatinfluence the consumption frequencies of frozen food products. The results revealed that the rate of households which consumed frozen food was 18% and monthly frozen food consumption per capita was 0.54 kg in the sample. The research results also showed that the socio-economic factors such as household size, age of household head, households’ income, household with working wife and the attitudes such as consumers’ health concern, product price and time saving significantly influence consumption of frozen food consumption.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, tüketicilerin dondurulmuş gıda tüketim sıklığını etkileyen sosyo-ekonomik ve davranışsal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri Samsun ilinde yaşayan ve tesadüfî örnekleme ile belirlenen 185 aileden anket yoluyla sağlanmıştır. Sosyo-ekonomik ve davranışsal özelliklerin, dondurulmuş gıda tüketim sıklığına etkisi, sıralı probit model kullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, ankete katılan ailelerden %82’sinin dondurulmuş gıda tükettiğini ve ortalama dondurulmuş gıda tüketim miktarının aylık kişi başına 0.54 kg olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Araştırma sonuçları, ayrıca, sosyo-ekonomik değişkenlerden ailenin nüfus yoğunluğu, aile reisinin yaşı, ailenin geliri, ev hanımının çalışıyor olması ile davranışsaldeğişkenlerden sağlık, fiyat ve zamandan tasarrufun dondurulmuş gıda tüketim sıklığı üzerinde önemli etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDÜZ, O., EMİR, M. (2014). ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING FROZEN FOOD CONSUMPTION: A CASE STUDY OF SAMSUN, TURKEY. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 15–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/423186

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akbay, C., Tiryaki, G.Y., Gül, A., 2007. Consumer characteristics influencing fast food consumption in Turkey. Food Control, 18:904-913. Anonim, 2010a. Frozen Food Sector in Turkey, 2009. www.gkistanbul.um.dk/NR/rdonlyres/./Sect or_Frozenfood.pdf erişim:24.08.2010) Anonim, 2010b. “Dondurulmuş gıda devi IGLO 7 milyon euro yatırımla geldi”. (http://www.referansgazetesi.com/haber.aspx ?HBR_KOD=118200 erişim:24.08.2010). Anonim, 2010c. European frozen food consumption inches up 3.3% to 11.7 million tons: health concerns spur growth in vegetables, poultry, fish and seafood, and low-calorie meals (http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_01992376275/European-frozen-foodconsumption-inches.html) (erişim: 24.08.2010)
  2. Boccaletti, S., Moro, D., 2000. Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for GM Food Products in Italy. Agbioforum, 3 (4): 259-267.
  3. Chen, K., Ali, M., Veeman, M., Unterschultz, J., Le, T.,.2002. Relative importance rankings for pork attributes by Asian-origin consumers in California: Applying an ordered probit model to a choice-based sample. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 34(1): 67-79.
  4. Collins, M., 1986. Sampling. (Editors: Worcester, R.M. & Downham, J.), Consumer Market Research Handbook, London: McGraw-Hill. Conner, D., Colasanti, K., Ross, R.B., Smalley, S.B., 2010. Locally Grown Foods and Farmers Markets: Consumer Attitudes and Behaviors. Sustainability, 2 (3):742-756.
  5. Cranfield, J.A.L., Magnusson, E., 2003. Canadian Consumer’s Willingness-To-Pay For Pesticide Free Food Products: An Ordered Probit Analysist. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 6 (4):13-30.
  6. Greene, W.H., 1997. Econometric Analysis. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1000s. Gürbüz, İ.B., Acar, B., 2002. Bursa İlinde Yer Alan Dondurulmuş Gıda Sanayinin Dış Ticarette Karşılaştığı Sorunlar. Türkiye V. Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 18-20 Eylül, s:211-216,
  7. Erzurum. Keskin, G., 2002. Dondurulmuş Gıda. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları,
  8. TEAE Bakış, Sayı:1, Nüsha:8, Ankara.
  9. Külekçi, M., Topaloğlu, A., Aksoy, A., 2006. Dondurulmuş Gıda Tüketimini Etkileyen Sosyo-Ekonomik Özelliklerin Belirlenmesi: Erzurum İli Örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 37 (1):91-101.
  10. Maddala, G. S., 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. McFadden, D., 1973. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: A