Journals / Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF GLOBALIZATION ON THE EURO AREA COUNTRIES’ ECONOMIC GROWTH WITH PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

Pages
118–129
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Globalization has increasing effects on the economic growth in Italy, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain but decreasing effect in Ireland, Lithuania and Luxembourg.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine whether globalization affects economic growth in Euro Area countries or not and the direction of the affect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data used are annually and cover the period from 2000 to 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Globalization has increasing effects on the economic growth in Italy, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain but decreasing effect in Ireland, Lithuania and Luxembourg.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Globalization · KOF Index · Panel Data

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether globalization affects economic growth in Euro Area countries or not and the direction of the affect. The data used are annually and cover the period from 2000 to 2017. In the study, economic growth which is the dependent variable represents the annual GDP growth rate, and globalization which is the independent variable represents KOF globalization. Variables other than globalization that affect economic growth are included in the model as instrumental variables. These instrumental variables are labour force participation rate, foreign direct investments, external balance of goods and services and gross fixed capital formation. Eberhardt and Teal’s (2012) Augmented Mean Group Estimator (AMG) was conducted to foresee long-term coefficients. Consequently, globalization has not same effects on economic growth in each euro area country. Globalization has increasing effects on the economic growth in Italy, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain but decreasing effect in Ireland, Lithuania and Luxembourg.

Özet

This study aims to determine whether globalization affects economic growth in Euro Area countries or not and the direction of the affect. The data used are annually and cover the period from 2000 to 2017. In the study, economic growth which is the dependent variable represents the annual GDP growth rate, and globalization which is the independent variable represents KOF globalization. Variables other than globalization that affect economic growth are included in the model as instrumental variables. These instrumental variables are labour force participation rate, foreign direct investments, external balance of goods and services and gross fixed capital formation. Eberhardt and Teal’s (2012) Augmented Mean Group Estimator (AMG) was conducted to foresee long-term coefficients. Consequently, globalization has not same effects on economic growth in each euro area country. Globalization has increasing effects on the economic growth in Italy, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain but decreasing effect in Ireland, Lithuania and Luxembourg.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, E. K., SÜLÜN, D. (2022). EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF GLOBALIZATION ON THE EURO AREA COUNTRIES’ ECONOMIC GROWTH WITH PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 118–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/422612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Adams, S.(2010). Globalization and Economic Growth in Sub-Sahara Africa. K. Deng (Eds.), Globalization, Today, Tomorrow, pp.(125-138),INTECH Publishing. Afzal, M. (2007). The Impact of Globalization on Economic Growth of Pakistan, The Pakistan Development Review, 46(4), (pp. 723–734).
  2. Alfaro, L.(2003). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth: Does the Sector Matter?, Harvard Business School, 1-31.
  3. Breusch, T. and Pagan, A.(1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Application to Model Specification in Econometrics, Review of Economic Studies 47,pp.239-254.
  4. Chang, C.P. and Lee, C.C. (2010). Globalization and Economic Growth: a Political Economy Analysis for OECD Countries, Global Economic Review, 39(2), pp.151-173.
  5. Cusack, T. R. (1997). Partisan Politics and Public Finance: Changes in Public Spending in the Industrialized Democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice, 91(3–4), pp. 375–395.
  6. Dollar, D. Kraay, A.(2004).
  7. Trade Growth and Poverty, The Economic Journal 114, pp. 22-49.
  8. Dreher, A.(2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization, Applied Economics, 38(10), pp. 1091-1110.
  9. Eberhardt, M. and Bond, S.(2009). Cross-section Dependence in Nonstationary Panel Models: A Novel Estimator, MPRA Paper 17692, http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/17692.pdf
  10. Eberhardt, M.(2012). Estimating Panel Time-Series Models with Heterogeneous Slopes, The Stata Journal,12(1),(pp.61–71).
  11. European Commission, What is the Economic and Monetary Union? (EMU), Access Date: 01.07.2020, https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/economic-and-monetary-union/what-economic-and-monetary-union-emu_en
  12. European Commission, Which Countries Use the Euro?, European Commission, Access date: 06.07.2020, https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/euro/which-countries-use-euro_en, 2020
  13. Garrett, G. (1995).
  14. Capital Mobility, Trade, and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy, International Organization 49 (4), (pp.657–687).
  15. Gurgul H. and Lach L. (2014). Globalization and economic growth: Evidence from two decades of transition in CEE, Economic Modelling, 36, (pp. 99-107).
  16. Haini, H. and Loon, P.W. (2022). Information Communication Technologies, Globalisation and Growth: Evidence from the ASEAN Economies, Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 41(1), (pp.34-53).
  17. Ohuabunwa M. and Iheanyichukwu, S.(1999). The Challenges of Globalisation to the Nigerian Industrial Sector, Nigerian Tribune,14, (pp.20-21).
  18. Osterloh, S.(2012).