Journals / Türkbilig / 2015 / Sayı: 29

On Grammaticalization of Converb Constructions in South Siberian Turkic

GÜNEY SİBİRYA TÜRKÇESİNDE ZARF-FİİLLİ YAPILARIN GRAMERLEŞMESİ HAKKINDA

Journal
Türkbilig
Pages
89–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Futhermore, the South Siberian Turkic languages are compared with each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article deals with the grammaticalization of converb constructions in South Siberian Turkic which is a sub-branch of Northeast Turkic and includes five languages: Tuvan, Karagas, Khakas, Shor, Altay and Chulym Turkic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is very noticeable that converbs in these languages occur with a wide range uses and functions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Futhermore, the South Siberian Turkic languages are compared with each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article deals with the grammaticalization of converb constructions in South Siberian Turkic which is a sub-branch of Northeast Turkic and includes five languages: Tuvan, Karagas, Khakas, Shor, Altay and Chulym Turkic. It is very noticeable that converbs in these languages occur with a wide range uses and functions. One of the main functions of converbs is that they construct so-called postverb constructions together with auxiliary verbs. In this sense, the converb suffix and auxiliary verb compose the postverb structure. Postverb constructions of this kind are multifunctional and both frequently used in South Siberian Turkic languages. These constructions serve primarily the categories of actionality, aspectotempus and mood. Moreover, the postverb consructions can form one type of subordinate adverbial clauses, namely aim sentences. In this acticle the categories actionality, aspectotempus and mood will be discussed and described in detail. Futhermore, the South Siberian Turkic languages are compared with each other.

Özet

Bu makalede, Güney Sibirya Türkçesinde zarf-fiilli yapıların gramerleşmesi ele alınacaktır. Güney Sibirya Türkçesi, Türk dillerinin Kuzeydoğu (Sibirya) grubunun bir alt kolu olup Tuvaca, Karagasça, Hakasça, Şorca ve Çulım Türkçesinden oluşmaktadır. Söz konusu bu dillerde zarf-fiiller çok geniş bir kullanım ve işlev yelpazesiyle karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bunlardan biri de, belli zarf-fiil eklerinin bir bileşen olarak içinde yer aldıkları ekleşik fiil yapılarıdır (Postverbien). Gramerleşmeyle oluşmuş bu yapılar, Güney Sibirya Türk dillerinde hem çok işlevlidir hem de çok sık kullanılmaktadır. İşte bu zarf-fiilli yapıların (ekleşik fiillerin) gramerleşmesi neticesinde, kılınış (Aktionsart), görünüş-zaman (Aspektotempus) ve kip (olanak/yeterlik) kategorilerinin yanı sıra belli bağımlı cümle tipleri (amaç cümleleri) de oluşmuştur. Bu makale kapsamında, bu kategorilere giren yapılar ele alınıp detaylıca betimlenecektir. Bu yapılırken Güney Sibirya Türk dillerinin kendi aralarında bir mukayesesi de yapılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMİR, İ. A. (2015). On Grammaticalization of Converb Constructions in South Siberian Turkic. Türkbilig, Sayı: 29, 89–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/418391

References (6)

  1. ANDERSON, G. D. S. & HARRISON, K. D. (1999), Tyvan. Languages of the World/Materials 257. München: Lincom-Europa. ANDERSON, G. D. S. (2004), Auxiliary Verb Constructions in Altai-Sayan Turkic, Turcologica 51, Harrassowitz: Wiesbaden...., (2005), Language Contact in South Siberian. Harrassowitz: Wiesbaden. AYDEMİR, İbrahim Ahmet, (2006), “Über Finitformen im Altai-Tuwinischen”. Marcel Erdal & Irina Nevskaya (Haz.), Exploring the Eastern Frontiers of Turkic (Turcologica 60.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz: 1-10...., (2009), Konverbien im Tuwinischen. Eine Unterschung unter Berücksichtigung des Altai-Dialekts. (Turcologica 80.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz...., (2010), Türkçede Zaman ve Görünüş Sistemi. Ankara: Grafiker Yayınları...., (2012). “Zu Postverbialverbindungen im Altai-Tuwinischen”. M. Erdal, A. Menz & I. Nevskaya (Haz.) Areal, historical and typological aspects of South Siberian Turkic, (Turkologica 94), Harrassowitz: Wiesbaden: 37-44.
  2. BACANLI, E. (2014), Kılınış Kategorisi ve Altaycada Kılınış Belirleyicisi Olarak Art Fiiller, Ankara: TDK Yayınları. BERGEL’SON, M. B. & KIBRIK, A. A. (1995), “The system of switch-reference in Tuva. Converbal and masdar-case forms”. M. Haspelmath & E. König (Haz.) Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms ̶ adverbial participles, gerunds, empirical approaches to language typology 13. Berlin, New York: Mounton de Gruyter: 373-414.
  3. BRİNTON, L. J. & E. C. TRAUGOTT (2005), Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge University Press. BUßMANN, H. (1990), Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag. DEMIR, N. (1993), Postverbien im Türkeitürkischen. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung eines südanatolischen Dorfdialekts. (Turcologica 17.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. DEMIRCI, K. (2008), “Dilbilgiselleşme Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, bilig, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkish World) 45: 131-146.
  4. HEİNE, B. & T. KUTEVA (2002), World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
  5. HOPPER, Paul J. & E. C. TRAUGOTT (2003), Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
  6. ISXAKOV, F. G. & PAL’MBAX, A. A. (1961), Grammatika tuvinskogo jazyka. Fonetika i morfolo-gija. Moskva JOHANSON, L. (1971), Aspekt im Türkischen. Vorstudien zu einer Beschreibung des türkeitürkischen Aspektsystems. Studia Turcica Upsaliensia 1. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell...., (1990), ‘Zur Postterminalität türkischer sy