Journals / Türkiye'de Lösemi Lenfoma Miyelom Araştırmaları / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Survival Data in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Otolog Hematopoietik Kök Hücre Nakli Yapılan Multipl Miyelom Hastalarında Sağkalım Verileri

Pages
11–15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We aimed to obtain the overall survival and progression-free survival data of our patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of MM in our center and underwent AHSCT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has become the Standard treatment after high-dose therapy in patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Therewere 36 patients with a diagnosis of MM who were followed upand treated in the hematology department of the Health Sciences University İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital between 2017-2020 and underwent AHSCT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We aimed to obtain the overall survival and progression-free survival data of our patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of MM in our center and underwent AHSCT.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has become the Standard treatment after high-dose therapy in patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM). We aimed to obtain the overall survival and progression-free survival data of our patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of MM in our center and underwent AHSCT. Patients and Methods: Therewere 36 patients with a diagnosis of MM who were followed upand treated in the hematology department of the Health Sciences University İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital between 2017-2020 and underwent AHSCT. Data was scanned retrospectively through the file system. Results: Of the 36 MM patients, 20 were male and 16 were female. Median age at diagnosis was 59 years. Chemotherapy protocols containing bortezomib were given to all patients as initial therapy. When evaluated according to the ISS staging system, 6 patients (16.6%) were classified as ISS stage I, 16 patients (44.4%) as ISS stage II, and 14 patients (38.8%) as ISS stage III. As mobilization regimen, only G-CSF (5.5%) wasused in 2 patients, Cyclophosphomide and G-CSF (86.1%) in 31 patients, and Cyclophosphomide, G-CSF and Plerixafor in 3 patients (8.3%). The overall survival rate of our patients was found to be 85.0 ± 06.2% at the first year and 74.5 ± 07.9% at the second year. Progression-free survival results were found as 87.1 ± 6.1% at 1 year and 66.2 ± 9.5% at 2 years. Conclusion: MM is a heterogeneous disease and treatment should be individualized according to patient characteristics. New drugs belonging to many different classes have been found effective in the treatment. Significant improvement in survival has been achieved, especially with targeted therapies. According to our current data, AHSCT administered after high-dose chemotherapy in suitable patients is an effective treatment option.

Özet

Amaç: Multipl Myelom (MM) hastalarında yüksek doz tedavi sonrası otolog hematopoietik kök hücre nakli (OHKHN) standart tedavi haline gelmiştir. Biz de merkezimizde MM tanısı ile takip edilen ve OHKHN uygulanan hastalarımızın genel sağkalım ve progresyonsuz sağkalım verilerini elde etmeyi amaçladık. Hastalar ve Yöntem: 2017-2020 yılları arasında İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Hematoloji Kliniği takip ve tedavisi yapılan ve OHKHN uygulanmış MM tanılı 36 hasta yer aldı. Veriler geriye dönük dosya sistemi üzerinden tarandı. Bulgular: 36 MM tanılı hastadan 20’si erkek 16’sı kadındı. Medyan tanı yaşı 59 olarak saptandı. Hastaların tamamına başlangıç tedavisi olarak bortezomib içeren kemoterapi protokolleri verilmişti.ISS evreleme sistemine göre değerlendirildiğinde 6 hasta (% 16.6) ISS evre I, 16 hasta (%44.4) ISS evre II, 14 hasta (% 38.8) ISS evre III olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Mobilizasyon rejimi olarak 2 hastada yalnızca G-CSF (%5.5), 31 hastada Siklofosfomid ve G-CSF (%86.1), 3 hastada (%8.3) ise Siklofosfomid, G-CSF ve Pleriksafor kullanılmıştır. Hastalarımızın genel sağkalım oranı 1. yıl %85.0 ± 06.2, 2. yıl %74.5 ± 07.9 olarak bulunmuştur. Progresyonsuz sağkalım sonuçları ise 1. yıl %87.1 ± 6.1, 2. yıl %66.2 ± 9.5 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: MM heterojen bir hastalıktır ve tedavi hasta özelliklerine göre bireyselleştirilmelidir. Tedavide etkin birçok farklı sınıfa ait yeni ilaçlar bulunmuştur. Özellikle hedefe yönelik tedaviler ile sağkalımda belirgin iyileşme elde edilmiştir. Mevcut verilerimize göre uygun hastalarda yüksek doz kemoterapi sonrası uygulanan OHKHN etkin bir tedavi seçeneğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİR, O., MUTLU, C. A. (2021). Survival Data in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Türkiye'de Lösemi Lenfoma Miyelom Araştırmaları, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 11–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/417045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2011;364(11):1046-60
  2. Altekruse SF, Kosary C, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1975-2007. [Accessed date: March 10, 2011]
  3. Morgan GJ, Walker BA, Davies FE. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12(5):335-48
  4. Dingli D, Ailawadhi S, Bergsagel PL, Buadi FK, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, et al. Therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma: guidelines from the Mayo Stratification for Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92:578-98
  5. Rosko AE, Huang Y, Benson DM, Efebera YA, Hofmeister C, Jaglowski S, et al. Use of a comprehensive frailty assessment top redict morbidity in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing transplant. J Geriatr Oncol 2019;10:479-85
  6. Lemoli RM, Martinelli G, Zamagni E, Motta MR, Rizzi S, Terragna C, et al. Engraftment, clinical, and molecular follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma who were reinfused with highly purified CD34+ cells to support single or tandem high-dose chemotherapy. Blood 2000;95(7):2234
  7. Hartmann T, Hübel K, Monsef I, Engert A, Skoetz N. Additional plerixafort ogranulocytecolony-stimulating factors for haematopoietic stemcell mobilisation for autologous transplantation in people with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Cochrane Database SystRev 2015
  8. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Inter groupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med 1996;335:91-7
  9. Dhakal B, Szabo A, Chhabra S, Hamadani M, D’Souza A, Usmani SZ, et al. Autologous transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in theera of novelagent induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:343–50
  10. Smith A, Wisloff F, Samson D. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2005. Vol. 132, British Journal of Haematology. Br J Haematol;2006:410–51
  11. Kristinsson SY, Landgren O, Dickman PW, Derolf AR, Björkholm M. Patterns of survival in multiple myeloma: a population-based study of patients diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2003. J Clin Oncol 2007 May 20;25(15):1993-9
  12. Siegel DS, Desikan KR, Hehta J. Age is not a prognostic variable With autotransplants fob multipie myeloma. Blood 1999;3:51-4
  13. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Bladé J, et al. International staging system fo