SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Perspectives in Social Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Voter Religiosity Promoting Party-Voter Congruence on the ‘Super Issue’ in Turkey

Murat İNAN
Pages
271–289
Publication Date
2021-11-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This research was set out to explore empirically party-voter congruence on the

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was set out to explore empirically party-voter congruence on the
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research was set out to explore empirically party-voter congruence on the
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This research was set out to explore empirically party-voter congruence on the
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:siyasi temsil · Parti-seçmen uyumu · İdeoloji

Abstract

This research was set out to explore empirically party-voter congruence on the

Özet

Bu araştırma Türkiye'de Sol-Sağ ideolojik konumlanma ‘süper meselesine’ ilişkin partiseçmen uyumunu cevap verebilirlik perspektifinden ampirik olarak araştırmak için yapılmıştır.Çalışma siyasi partilerin seçmenlerin ideolojik yelpazedeki hareketlerine ne ölçüde cevapverdiğini ve bu cevabın büyüklüğünü belirlemede seçmen dindarlığının rolünü ortaya koymayıamaçlamaktadır. Bu araştırma, 1950 ile 2018 yılları arasında yapılan on sekiz genel seçimdenoluşan yarım asrı aşan bir dönemi kapsamaktadır. Araştırma sırasıyla Manifesto Projesi ve DünyaDeğerler Araştırması veri setlerinden elde edilen parti düzeyinde ve bireysel düzeydeki verileribirleştirmektedir. Bulgular Türkiye'de parti-seçmen ideolojik uyumunun sağlanmasında seçmendindarlığının önemli bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Seçmen dindarlığı düzeyi siyasi partilerinkendi seçmenlerinin ideolojik tercihlerine ne ölçüde uyum sağladığını ve aynı zamanda en çok oyalan rakip siyasi parti seçmenlerininkinden ne ölçüde uyumsuzlaştığını belirlemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNAN, M. (2021). Voter Religiosity Promoting Party-Voter Congruence on the ‘Super Issue’ in Turkey. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 271–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/415678

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Achen, C. H. (1978). Measuring representation. American Journal of Political Science, 475-510.
  2. Akarca, A. T., & Tansel, A. (2007). Social and economic determinants of Turkish voter choice in the 1995 parliamentary election. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 633-647.
  3. Aldrich, J. H., & McKelvey, R. D. (1977). A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections. American Political Science Review, 71(1), 111-130.
  4. Alvarez, S. E. (2018). Cultures of politics/politics of cultures: Revisioning Latin American social movements. Routledge. Bakker, R., Jolly, S., & Polk, J. (2012). Complexity in the European party space: Exploring dimensionality with experts. European Union Politics, 13(2), 219-245.
  5. Belchior, A. M. (2013). Explaining left–right party congruence across European party systems: a test of micro-, meso-, and macro-level models. Comparative Political Studies, 46(3), 352-386.
  6. Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. Routledge. Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2007). Benchmarks for text analysis: A response to Budge and Pennings. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 130-135.
  7. Benoit, K., Laver, M., Arnold, C., Pennings, P., & Hosli, M. O. (2005). Measuring national delegate positions at the convention on the future of Europe using computerized word scoring. European Union Politics, 6(3), 291-313.
  8. Blais, A., & Bodet, M. A. (2006). Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policy makers?. Comparative Political Studies, 39(10), 1243-1262.
  9. Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2006). Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 474-494.
  10. Budge, I., Robertson, D., Derek, H., & Hearl, D. (Eds.). (1987). Ideology, strategy and party change: spatial analyses of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Budge, I., & Hofferbert, R. I. (1990). Mandates and policy outputs: US party platforms and federal expenditures. American Political Science Review, 84(1), 111-131.
  12. Budge, I., Klingemann, H. D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping policy preferences: estimates for parties, electors, and governments, 1945- 1998 (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press on Demand. Busch, K. B. (2016). Estimating parties' left-right positions: Determinants of voters' perceptions' proximity to party ideology. Electoral studies, 41, 159-178.
  13. Castles, F. G. (1982). Left-right political scales: Some'expert'judgements. Converse, P. E., & Pierce, R. (198