Journals / Bankacılar / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 118

Regulation of Digital (Branchless) Banking

Dijital (Şubesiz) Bankaların Regülasyonu

Pages
124–142
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the developments and regulations stated and especially the licensing and regulation approaches of other countries regarding digital banking will be discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Digital banks or neobanks, which carry out their banking activities completely digitally without branches, have started to attract attention both in the world and in our country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The development of digital banking and related regulations in each country can be in different forms and scope.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the developments and regulations stated and especially the licensing and regulation approaches of other countries regarding digital banking will be discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Digital banks or neobanks, which carry out their banking activities completely digitally without branches, have started to attract attention both in the world and in our country. The development of digital banking and related regulations in each country can be in different forms and scope. In Turkey, it is seen that regulations very closely related to digital banking are being made, while targets specifically for digital banking licensing are set. Recently, although not directly for but closely related to digital banking, many regulations have been put into effect, including digital onboarding and regulations for establishing contracts in electronic environment to replace the written form. In this study, the developments and regulations stated and especially the licensing and regulation approaches of other countries regarding digital banking will be discussed.

Özet

Bankacılık faaliyetlerini şubeler olmadan tamamen dijital ortamda gerçekleştiren dijital bankalar ya da bir diğer ifadeyle neobanklar, gerek dünyada gerekse ülkemizde dikkat çekmeye başlamıştır. Her ülkede dijital bankacılığın gelişimi ve ilgili regülasyonlar farklı şekilde ve kapsamda olabilmektedir. Türkiye’de de dijital bankacılıkla çok yakından ilgili regülasyonların yapılmakta olduğu, bir taraftan da özel olarak dijital bankacılık lisanslamasına yönelik hedeflerin belirlendiği görülmektedir. Yakın zamanda, doğrudan dijital bankacılık için yapılmasa dahi, dijital bankacılık ile çok yakından ilişkili uzaktan kimlik tespiti ve yazılı şeklin yerine geçmek üzere elektronik ortamda sözleşme kurulmasına yönelik düzenlemeler dahil birçok düzenlemenin hayata geçirildiği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada belirtilen gelişmeler ve düzenlemeler ile diğer ülkelerin dijital bankacılığa ilişkin lisanslama ve regülasyon yaklaşımları ele alınacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALKAN, H. (2021). Regulation of Digital (Branchless) Banking. Bankacılar, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 118, 124–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/415515

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Archondakis, P. (2020). How are Neobanks Disrupting the Traditional Banking Industry? 24.05.2020 tarihinde https://www.epam.com/insights/blogs/how-neobanks-are-disrupting-the-traditionalbanking-industry adresinden erişildi. Basel Bankacılık Denetim Komitesi (2020). Açık Bankacılık ve Uygulama Programlama Arayüzleri Hakkında Rapor. Bankacılar Dergisi. (112), 105–122. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2018). Sound Pratices: İmplications Of Fintech Developments For Banks And Bank Supervisors. BBVA (2016). Digital Economy Outlook. 25.05.2020 tarihinde https://www.bbvaresearch.com/en/publicaciones/digital-economy-outlook-january2016/?comentar=true adresinden erişildi. BIS (2020). Regulating Fintech Financing: Digital Banks and Fintech Platforms. 03.04.2021 tarihinde https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights27.pdf adresinden erişildi. Burnmark (2016). Challenger Banking. 17.03.2021 tarihinde https://www.burnmark.com/uploads/reports/Burnmark_Report_Oct16_ChallengerBanking1.pdf adresinden erişildi. Citigroup (2018). The Bank of the Future: The ABCs of Digital Disruption in Finance. 01.03.2021 tarihinde https://www.citibank.com/commercialbank/insights/assets/docs/2018/The-Bank-of-theFuture/ adresinden erişildi. Deloitte (2020). Comparison of Regulatory Requirements for Digital Banks. 03.04.2021 tarihinde https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/my/Documents/risk/my-risk-regulatoryrequirements-digital-banks.pdf adresinden erişildi. ENISA (2021), Remote ID Proofing - Analysis of Methods To Carry Out İdentity Proofing Remotely. 09.05.2021 tarihinde https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-report-remote-id-proofing adresinden erişildi. Finnovate Research (2018). Neo Banks - Performance and New Ideas. 29.03.2021 tarihinde https://tinyurl.com/y3ep9ev8 adresinden erişildi. FinTech İstanbul (2019). Dünyada ve Türkiye'de Açık Bankacılık: Bankacılığın Geleceği. 25.03.2021 tarihinde https://bkm.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Dunyadaveturkiyedeacikbankacilik.pdf adresinden erişildi. FT Partners (2020). The Rise of Challenger Banks: Are the Apps Taking Over? 22.03.2021 tarihinde https://www.ftpartners.com/fintech-research/challenger-banks adresinden erişildi. González-Páramo, J. M. (2017). Financial Innovation in The Digital Age: Challenges for regulation and supervision (REVISTA DE ESTABILIDAD FINANCIERA No. 32). Kerse, M. / Jenik, I. (2020). Some Countries Have Digital Bank Licenses, Others Have Digital Banks. 03.04.2021 tarihinde https://www.cgap.org/blog/so