Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Laparoscopic nephrectomy in renal pathologies: A single-center experience

Pages
206–210
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important advantages of laparoscopic nephrectomy over open surgery are better tolerance, shorter hospital stay, less need for postoperative pain relief, and better cosmetic results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate our first experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign or malignant renal pathologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This study evaluated the data of 32 patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for benign and malign kidney pathologies in our clinic between March, 2016 and January, 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important advantages of laparoscopic nephrectomy over open surgery are better tolerance, shorter hospital stay, less need for postoperative pain relief, and better cosmetic results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate our first experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign or malignant renal pathologies. Materials and Methods: This study evaluated the data of 32 patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for benign and malign kidney pathologies in our clinic between March, 2016 and January, 2020. Demographic characteristics, operation time, blood loss, duration of hospital stay, pathology, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were examined. Results: Laparoscopic simple nephrectomy was performed in 17 (53.2%) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed in 15 (45.8%) of 32 patients. The median age was 57.8 (range, 19–86) years. While 19 (59.4%) of the renal pathologies were on the right side, 13 (40.6%) were on the left side. The median operation time was 136 (range, 102–262) min. Open surgery was started because the kidney was highly adherent to the surrounding tissues in two (6.3%) patients. In the postoperative period, one unit of blood was transfused to one (3.1%) patient. The median hospital stay was 4.1 (range, 3–8) days. Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a minimally invasive surgical method that can be performed safely and effectively. The most important advantages of laparoscopic nephrectomy over open surgery are better tolerance, shorter hospital stay, less need for postoperative pain relief, and better cosmetic results.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARUT, O., DEMİRKOL, M. K., OKYAY, Y. S., KÜÇÜKDURMAZ, F., ŞAHİNKANAT, T., RESİM, S. (2020). Laparoscopic nephrectomy in renal pathologies: A single-center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 206–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/415053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Davis CJ, Filipi CJ. A History of Endoscopic Surgery. In: Arregui ME, Fitzgibbons RJ, Katkhouda N, McKernan JB, Reich H, editors. Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery. New York: Springer; 1995. p. 15
  2. Bozan M, Gültürk B, Kutluer N, Azak A, Kanat B, Aksu A, et al. Effect of preoperative radiotherapy and emergent surgery on conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2020;4:374−7. [CrossRef] 3. Akin Y, Ates M, Celik O, Ucar M, Yucel S, Erdogru T. Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a center surgeon’s experience involving 601 procedures including the learning curve. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2013;29:275−9. [CrossRef] 4. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1991;146:278−82. [CrossRef] 5. Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol 1993;7:521−6. [CrossRef] 6. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1993;149:103−5
  3. Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2000;27:707−19. [CrossRef] 8. Chung JH, Lee SW, Lee KS, Cho WY, Kim TH. Safety of en bloc ligation of the renal hilum during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:489−94. [CrossRef] 9. Steinberg AP, Finelli A, Desai MM, Abreu SC, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors. J Urol 2004;172:2172−6
  4. Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J, Chen C, Barrett PH, Fentie DD, et al. Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002;167:1257−62. [CrossRef] 11. Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Chopin DK, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 1999;161:1776−80. [CrossRef] 12. Demir Ö, Öztürk B, Egriboyun S, Esen A. Kliniğimizde Lapa- ¬roskopik cerrahide ilk deneyimlerimiz ve öğrenme süreci. Dokuz Eylül Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2010;24:105−12
  5. Leclair MD, Vidal I, Suply E, Podevin G, Héloury Y. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy in duplex kidney in infants and children: a 15-year experience. Eur Urol 2009;56:385−9. [CrossRef] 14. Kim C, McKay K, Docimo SG. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in children: systematic review of transperitoneal and retroperit