SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Is seminal pH and liquefaction time effective on motility and morphology?

Semen pH ve likefaksiyon süresi motilite ve morfoloji üzerinde etkili midir?

Mehmet Kutlu DEMİRKOL
Sefa RESİM
Neslihan TEMİZ
Mustafa Bilal HAMARAT
Osman BARUT
Pages
172–177
Publication Date
2021-07-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The median pH and liquefaction time of the abnormal group were statistically higher than the normal group (both, p 8.0) group was significantly lower than both acidic and normal ph groups (for all, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective There are not enough reports about whether liquefaction time and semen pH values are related to sperm functions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The samples were also grouped according to semen pH as acidic (8.0) and liquefaction time as normal liquefying (≤30 min.) and slow liquefying (> 30 min.), and then were compared in terms of the normal/abnormal status of concentration, motility and morphology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The median pH and liquefaction time of the abnormal group were statistically higher than the normal group (both, p 8.0) group was significantly lower than both acidic and normal ph groups (for all, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Likefaksiyon süresi · morfoloji · motilite

Abstract

Objective There are not enough reports about whether liquefaction time and semen pH values are related to sperm functions. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether there is a relationship between pH and liquefaction time and major semen parameters. Material and Methods The data were divided into groups as normal and abnormal and compared in terms of pH and liquefaction times. The samples were also grouped according to semen pH as acidic (8.0) and liquefaction time as normal liquefying (≤30 min.) and slow liquefying (> 30 min.), and then were compared in terms of the normal/abnormal status of concentration, motility and morphology. Results Of the 600 semen samples, 400 (66.7%) were grouped as abnormal and 200 (33.3%) as normal. The median pH and liquefaction time of the abnormal group were statistically higher than the normal group (both, p 8.0) group was significantly lower than both acidic and normal ph groups (for all, p

Özet

AMAÇ Lİkefaksiyon süresi ve semen pH değerlerinin sperm fonksiyonları ile ilişkili olup olmadığı konusunda yeterli çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmada pH ve lİkefaksiyon süresi ile ana semen parametreleri arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığı değerlendirilmesi hedeflendi. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇ Veriler normal ve anormal olarak gruplara ayrıldı ve pH ve likefaksiyon süreleri açısından karşılaştırıldı. Örnekler ayrıca semen pH değerine göre asidik ( 8.0) ve likefaksiyon süresine göre normal sıvılaştırma (≤30 dak.) ve yavaş sıvılaştırma (> 30 dak.) şeklinde gruplandırıldı, ve daha sonra konsantrasyon, motilite ve morfoloji bozuklukları açısından karşılaştırıldı. BULGULAR 600 semen örneğinden 400'ü (% 66.7) anormal, 200'ü (% 33.3) normal olarak gruplandırıldı. Anormal grubun medyan pH ve sıvılaşma süresi normal gruptan istatistiksel olarak daha yüksekti (her ikisi de, p 8.0) grubunun konsantrasyonu, progresif motilitesi ve morfolojisi hem asidik hem de normal ph gruplarından anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (hepsi için p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKOL, M. K., RESİM, S., TEMİZ, N., HAMARAT, M. B., BARUT, O. (2021). Is seminal pH and liquefaction time effective on motility and morphology?. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 172–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/783219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. World Health O. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010
  2. Amelar RD, Hotchkiss RS. THE SPLIT EJACULATE: ITS USE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MALE INFERTILITY. Fertility and sterility. 1965;16:46-60
  3. Tauber PF, Propping D, Schumacher GFB, Zaneveld LJD. Biochemical Aspects of the Coagulation and Liquefaction of Human Semen. Journal of andrology. 1980;1(6):281-8
  4. Mandal A, Bhattacharyya AK. Some preliminary observations on the liquefaction of human semen. Andrologia. 1985;17(3):228-33
  5. Mandal A, Bhattacharyya AK. Biochemical Parameters of Slowly Liquefying Human Ejaculates. Archives of Andrology. 1988;20(2):141-5
  6. Bhushan S, Pandey RC, Singh SP, Pandey DN, Seth P. Some observations on human semen analysis. Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology. 1978;22(4):393-6
  7. World Health O. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 3rd ed. ed. Cambridge [England];: Published on behalf of the World Health Organization by Cambridge University Press; 1992
  8. Banjoko SO, Adeseolu FO. Seminal Plasma pH, Inorganic Phosphate, Total and Ionized Calcium Concentrations In The Assessment of Human Spermatozoa Function. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013;7(11):2483-6
  9. LG H WC, QD H, TY H. Semen pH and sperm morphological changes in less, weak sperm disease clinical significance. Contemporary Medicine. 2013;19:2
  10. Haugen TB, Grotmol T. pH of human semen. Int J Androl. 1998;21(2):105-8
  11. Harraway C, Berger NG, Dubin NH. Semen pH in patients with normal versus abnormal sperm characteristics. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;182(5):1045-7
  12. Zhou J, Chen L, Li J, Li H, Hong Z, Xie M, et al. The Semen pH Affects Sperm Motility and Capacitation. PloS one. 2015;10(7):e0132974.