Journals / Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Forage Yield and Some Quality Characteristics of Silage Sorghum Genotypes at Different Water Stress Levels

Pages
1–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The genotypes used in the study, in which the efficiency of irrigation water use efficiency increased as water stress increased, the lowest and highest dry matter yields were obtained from genotypes G11 (4214 kg da-1$da^{-1}$ ) and G-4 (6961 kg $da^{-1}$ ), respectively, while a total of 8 genotypes had higher green herbage yield values than the study average

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study was conducted in order to determine the forage yield and some quality characteristics of silage sorghum genotypes at different water stress levels in the Randomized Complete Block Design arranged in split plots under Konya ecological conditions in 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three irrigation treatments ($I_1$: Full irrigation; $I_2$: 75% of $I_1$; $I_3$: 50% of I1) and 14 silage sorghum genotypes supplied from other countries were used in this study, irrigation subjects formed the main parcels and the genotypes sub-plots.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The genotypes used in the study, in which the efficiency of irrigation water use efficiency increased as water stress increased, the lowest and highest dry matter yields were obtained from genotypes G11 (4214 kg da-1$da^{-1}$ ) and G-4 (6961 kg $da^{-1}$ ), respectively, while a total of 8 genotypes had higher green herbage yield values than the study average
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The study was conducted in order to determine the forage yield and some quality characteristics of silage sorghum genotypes at different water stress levels in the Randomized Complete Block Design arranged in split plots under Konya ecological conditions in 2020. Three irrigation treatments ($I_1$: Full irrigation; $I_2$: 75% of $I_1$; $I_3$: 50% of I1) and 14 silage sorghum genotypes supplied from other countries were used in this study, irrigation subjects formed the main parcels and the genotypes sub-plots. In the study, the lowest and highest values were; 4756 kg $da^{-1}$ ($I_3$)-6757 kg $da^{-1}$ ($I_1$) for green herbage yield; 1149 kg $da^{-1}$ ($I_3$)-2002 kg $da^{-1}$ ($I_1$) for dry matter yield, 8,1 % ($I_1$)-9,6% ($I_2$) for crude protein, 33.3% (I2)- 34.5% (I1) for ADF ratio, 55% ($I_3$)- 58.4% ($I_2$) for NDF ratio and and cellulose ratio was determined as 25.6% ($I_3$)-28.2% ($I_1$) respectively. The genotypes used in the study, in which the efficiency of irrigation water use efficiency increased as water stress increased, the lowest and highest dry matter yields were obtained from genotypes G11 (4214 kg da-1$da^{-1}$ ) and G-4 (6961 kg $da^{-1}$ ), respectively, while a total of 8 genotypes had higher green herbage yield values than the study average

🔖

Cite This Article

ARICI, R. Ç., AVCI, M. A. (2022). Determination of Forage Yield and Some Quality Characteristics of Silage Sorghum Genotypes at Different Water Stress Levels. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/415001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anonim (2020).
  2. Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Klimatoloji Şube Müdürlüğü Kalaba, Ankara,
  3. Türkiye. Anonymous (2009). Approved methodologies, www.leco.com/resources/approved_methods. Anonymous (2011). World Economic Forum Global Risks 2011: Sixth Edition. Geneva, http://riskreport.weforum.org/global-risks-2011.pdf
  4. Aydinşakir K, Dinç N, Büyüktaş D, Erdurmus C, Bayram E (2018). Yüzeyaltı ve yüzeyüstü damla sulama sistemiyle sulanan sorgumun sulama programının oluşturulması, TÜBİTAK Program Kodu: 1001 Proje No: 116 O 262. Bean B, Mccollum T, Pietsch D, Rowland M, Porter B, Vanmeter R (2002). Texas panhandle forage sorghum silage trial. The Agriculture Program of Texas A&M University System. Canyiğit M, Okant M (2018). Bitki aktivatörünün sorgumsudan otu melezi farklı uygulamalarının verim ve verim unsurlarına etkisi, ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2 (1), 1-9.
  5. Chakravarthi MK, Reddy YR, Rao KS, Ravi A, Punyakumari B, Ekambaram B (2017). A study on nutritive value and chemical composition of sorghum fodder, Int J Sci Environ Technol, 6, 104-109.
  6. Cotton J, Burow G, Martinez VA, Kucera JM (2013). Biomass and cellulosic ethanol production of forage sorghum under limited Water conditions. Bioenerg. Res. 6:711–718
  7. Dahmardeh K, Rad MRP, Rad M, Hadizadeh M (2015). Effects of potassium rates and irrigation regimes on yield of forage sorghum in arid regions, International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 6 (4), 207-212.
  8. Gonulal E (2020). Performance of sorghumxsudan grass hybrıd (Sorghum bicolor L.× Sorhgum sudanense) cultıvars under water stress condıtıons of arıd and semıarıd regıons. Journal of Global. Innov. Agric. Soc. Sci., 2020,8(2):78-82.
  9. House L (1985) A guide to sorghum breeding. ICRISAT Patanchru, AP India. Howell T, Evett S, Tolk J, Copeland K, Colaizzi P, Gowda P (2008) Evapotranspiration of corn and forage sorghum for silage, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008: Ahupua'A, 1-14.
  10. Howell TA, Cuenca RH, Solomon KH (1990).
  11. Crop yield response. "Manegement of farm irrigation systems, Edit. G.J. Hoffman., T.A. Howell., K.H. Solomon." Chap. 5. An ASAE Monograph, s. 93-116.
  12. Islam MR, Garcia SC, Horadagoda A (2012). Effects of irrigation and rates and timing of nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter yield proportions of plant fractions of maize and nutritive value and in vitro gas production characteristics f whole crop maize silage. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 172:125-135
  13. Jahansouz RM, Afshar RK, Heidari A, Hashemi, M (2014). Evaluation of y