SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Determination of The Seedling Reactions of Some Two-Rowed Barley Landraces Maintained at Osman Tosun Gene Bank to Pyrenophora Teres F. Teres

Awet ARAYA
Aziz KARAKAYA
Arzu ÇELİK OĞUZ
Güray AKDOĞAN
Pages
20–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This landrace from Diyarbakır could be used as the seed source and in the breeding studies for obtaining barley cultivars resistant to the net form of net blotch disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Seedling stage reactions of thirty-eight 2-rowed barley landraces representing different areas of Turkey obtained from Osman Tosun Gene Bank to two Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolates were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, barley cultivars Bülbül 89 and Avcı 2002 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This landrace from Diyarbakır could be used as the seed source and in the breeding studies for obtaining barley cultivars resistant to the net form of net blotch disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Seedling stage reactions of thirty-eight 2-rowed barley landraces representing different areas of Turkey obtained from Osman Tosun Gene Bank to two Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolates were evaluated. In addition, barley cultivars Bülbül 89 and Avcı 2002 were included. Landraces exhibited different reactions to the disease and their reactions ranged from resistant- moderately resistant to susceptible. Landrace number 33 obtained from Diyarbakır was found the most resistant to the disease compared to all other landraces whereas landrace number 10 obtained from Bilecik-Söğüt, and cultivar Bülbül 89 were the most susceptible. The majority of the landraces were classified between the Moderately Resistant-Moderately Susceptible to Moderately Susceptible-Susceptible. Landrace number 33 exhibited Resistant-Moderately Resistant reactions to both isolates. This landrace from Diyarbakır could be used as the seed source and in the breeding studies for obtaining barley cultivars resistant to the net form of net blotch disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAYA, A., KARAKAYA, A., OĞUZ, A. Ç., AKDOĞAN, G. (2022). Determination of The Seedling Reactions of Some Two-Rowed Barley Landraces Maintained at Osman Tosun Gene Bank to Pyrenophora Teres F. Teres. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 20–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/414998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aktaş H (1995). Reactions of Turkish and German barley varieties and lines to the virulent strain T4 of Pyrenophora teres. Rachis 14 (1/2): 9-13.
  2. Attene G, Ceccarelli S and Papa R (1996). The barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) of Sardinia, Italy. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 43: 385–393.
  3. Brush SB (1995). In situ conservation of landraces in centre of crop diversity. Crop Science, 35: 346-354.
  4. Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Tutwiler R, Baha J, Martini AM and Goodchild H, Michael M (2000). A methodological study on participatory barley breeding. I. Selection phase. Euphytica, 111: 91–104.
  5. Ceccarelli S and Grando S (2000). Barley landraces from the Fertile Crescent. A lesson for plant breeders. In: S B Brush (Ed.), Genes in the field, On-farm conservation of crop diversity. Int. Plant Gen. Res. Institute, International Development Research Center, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. pp. 51-76.
  6. Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Mert Z (2014). Morphological and pathological variation detected among Turkish isolates of Drechslera teres. IWBLD – 1st International Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases, Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy, June 3-6, 2014.
  7. Çelik E and Karakaya A (2015). Eskişehir ili arpa ekim alanlarında görülen fungal yaprak ve başak hastalıklarının görülme sıklıklarının ve yoğunluklarının belirlenmesi. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 55(2): 157-170.
  8. Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Mert Z, Aydın G, Peşkircioğlu H, Tutluer İ, Sağel Z (2016). Seedling response of gamma ray induced advanced barley lines to three isolates of Drechslera teres f teres. Works of the Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Sarajevo, Vol.LXI, 66/1: 240-243.
  9. Çelik OA and Karakaya A (2017). Pathotypes of Pyrenophora teres on barley in Turkey. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 56: 224−234. Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Ergün N and Sayim İ (2017). Turkish barley landraces resistant to net and spot forms of Pyrenophora teres. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 56: 217−223. Çelik OA, Ölmez F and Karakaya A (2018). Mating type idiomorphs of Pyrenophora teres in Turkey. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 105(3):271-278.
  10. Çelik OA, Ölmez F and Karakaya A (2019a). Genetic diversity of net blotch pathogens of barley in Turkey.International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 21:1089-1096.
  11. Çelik OA, Rahimi A and Karakaya A (2019b). Seedling response of Iranian barley landraces to Pyrenophora teres f. teres and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 25: 86-92.
  12. Çelik OA, Karakaya A, Duran RM, Özbek K (2019c).