Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2012 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5

Acil serviste üst gastrointestinal sistem kanamal hastalarda Glasgow Blatchford skorlama sisteminin prospektif de¤erlendirilmesi

Prospective validation of the Glasgow Blatchford scoring system in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department

Pages
448–455
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Top Summary Introduction Materials And Methods Results Discussion References

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aims: This study aimed to allow decision-making about hospitalization or discharge using the Glasgow Blatchford Scoring system, a risk analysis performed using basic laboratory and clinical variables, in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study conducted in the Emergency Department of a university hospital enrolled patients aged ≥18 years, who presented to the Emergency Department with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding between June 2009 and December 2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Top Summary Introduction Materials And Methods Results Discussion References
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aims: This study aimed to allow decision-making about hospitalization or discharge using the Glasgow Blatchford Scoring system, a risk analysis performed using basic laboratory and clinical variables, in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study conducted in the Emergency Department of a university hospital enrolled patients aged &#8805;18 years, who presented to the Emergency Department with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding between June 2009 and December 2010. For all patients, Glasgow Blatchford Scoring scores were calculated, and the patients were classified into two groups as high-risk and low-risk patients. Results: A total of 160 subjects with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding were enrolled in the study. Mean Glasgow Blatchford Scoring scores were 7.1±3.8 for 71 low-risk subjects and 11.7±2.9 for 89 high-risk subjects, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). When the performance of the Glasgow Blatchford Scoring system was evaluated in the determination of high risk, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 1.41%, respectively, for a cut-off value of Glasgow Blatchford Scoring >0, 100% and 16.9% for a cut-off value of Glasgow Blatchford Scoring >3, 96.63% and 36.62% for a cut-off value of Glasgow Blatchford Scoring >5, and 86.52% and 69.01% for a cut-off value of Glasgow Blatchford Scoring >8. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, for Glasgow Blatchford Scoring in the high-risk estimation, the area under the curve was found to be 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.88), and this value was statistically significant (p=0.0001). Conclusions: The Glasgow Blatchford Scoring system, which may be easily calculated based on laboratory and clinical variables, seems to be a useful scoring system for risk analysis of all patients with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding admitted to the Emergency Department. Top Summary Introduction Materials And Methods Results Discussion References

Özet

Amaç: Bu calığmanın amacı Acil Servise ust gastrointestinal sistem kanaması ile bağvuran hastalarda, temel laboratuar ve klinik de.iğkenler kullanılarak yapılan bir risk analizi olan Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama sistemi kullanılarak; yatığ ya da taburculuk kararının verilebilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bir Universite hastanesi Acil Servisinde yurutulen bu prospektif gozlemsel calığmada, Haziran 2009- Aralık 2010 tarihleri arasında ust gastrointestinal sistem kanaması ile Acil Servise bağvuran 18 yağ ustu olgular calığmaya alındı. Tum olguların Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama de.erleri hesaplandı. Ayrıca hastalar yuksek riskli ve duğuk riskli olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Calığmaya ust gastrointestinal sistem kanamalı toplam 160 olgu alındı. Duğuk riskli 71 olgunun ortalama Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama de.eri 7.1 }3.8 iken, yuksek riskli 89 olgunun ortalama Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama de.eri 11.7 }2.9 idi ve her iki grup arası nda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p 0 icin sensitivitesi %100 ve spesifitesi %1.41, Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama> 3 icin sensitivitesi %100 ve spesifitesi %16.9, Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama>5 icin sensitivitesi %96.63 ve spesifitesi %36.62 ve Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama>8 icin sensitivitesi %86.52 ve spesifitesi %69.01 olarak saptandı. ROC e.risi analiziyle, yuksek riski tahmininde Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama icin area under curve 0,82 (%95 CI 0,75-0,88) saptandı ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi (p=0.0001). Sonuç: Laboratuvar ve klinik de.iğkenlere bakılarak kolaylıkla hesaplanabilen Glasgow Blatchford Skorlama sistemi Acil Servise bağvuran tum ust gastrointestinal sistem kanamalı hastaların risk analizinde kullanığlı bir skorlama gibi gorunmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKSAL, Ö., ÖZEREN, G., ÖZDEMİR, F., armağan, E., AYDIN, Ş., AYYILDIZ, T. (2012). Acil serviste üst gastrointestinal sistem kanamal hastalarda Glasgow Blatchford skorlama sisteminin prospektif de¤erlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5, 448–455. https://ajindex.com/articles/409688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Longstreth GF. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 206-10
  2. Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, et al. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet 2009; 373: 42-7
  3. Atkinson RJ, Hurlstone DP. Usefulness of prognostic indices in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 233-42. Review
  4. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. BMJ 1995; 311: 222-6
  5. Adamopoulos AB, Baibas NM, Efstathiou SP, et al. Differentiation between patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding who need early urgent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and those who do not. A prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 15: 381-7. 6. van Leerdam ME. Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 209-24. Review
  6. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356: 1318-21
  7. Longstreth GF, Feitelberg SP. Outpatient care of selected patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 1995; 345: 108-11
  8. Packham CJ, Rockall TA, Logan RF. Outpatient care for selected patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet 1995; 345: 659-60
  9. Srirajaskanthan R, Conn R, Bulwer C, Irving P. The Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64: 868-74
  10. Masaoka T, Suzuki H, Hori S, et al. Blatchford scoring system is a useful scoring system for detecting patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who do not need endoscopic intervention. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 1404-8
  11. Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, et al. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25: 774-9
  12. Farooq FT, Lee MH, Das A, et al. Clinical triage decision vs risk scores in predicting the need for endotherapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30: 12934
  13. Hsu YC, Liou JM, C