Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The effect of feeding frequency on growth performance and feed conversion rate of Black Sea Trout (Salmo trutta labrax Pallas, 1811)

Pages
13–17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It seems that, Black Sea trout fed once a day grow lower than those fed two or three times a day, but FCR was the best than the other groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Growth, feed consumption and conversion ratios of Black Sea trout (Salmo trutta labrax Pallas, 1811) subjected to daily feeding frequencies were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The trial performed using 360 fish with a mean weight of 155.9±31.56 g was sampled, counted and divided equally to nine tanks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It seems that, Black Sea trout fed once a day grow lower than those fed two or three times a day, but FCR was the best than the other groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:yem çevirimi · Karadeniz · kültür balığı

Abstract

Growth, feed consumption and conversion ratios of Black Sea trout (Salmo trutta labrax Pallas, 1811) subjected to daily feeding frequencies were evaluated. The trial performed using 360 fish with a mean weight of 155.9±31.56 g was sampled, counted and divided equally to nine tanks. The three treatments (namely, daily feeding frequencies of one - F1, two - F2 and three - F3) were each applied to three tanks. Mean live weights of the fish in trial groups reached 201.7±3.42 g, 202.7±3.18 g and 217.6±2.54 g at the end of the trial in groups F1, F2 and F3, respectively. Growth data indicated that, the final live weight and SGR values of group F3 were significantly higher than those of the other groups (P<0.01). The best (lowest) mean FCR was obtained from once daily feeding (F1) (P<0.05). Condition factors (CF) showed similar values. It seems that, Black Sea trout fed once a day grow lower than those fed two or three times a day, but FCR was the best than the other groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞÇINAR, N., ÇAKMAK, E. (2007). The effect of feeding frequency on growth performance and feed conversion rate of Black Sea Trout (Salmo trutta labrax Pallas, 1811). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/408429

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anderson J.S., Higgs, D.A., Beams, R.M. and M. Rowshandeli, 1997. Fish meal quality assessment for Atlantic salmon {Salmo salar L.) reared in sea water. Aquaculture Nutrition, 3: 25-38
  2. Başçınar N., Okumuş İ., Başçınar N.S. and H. Sağlam Emiral, 2001. The influence of daily feeding frequency and feed consumption of rainbow trout fingerlings {Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared at 18.5 -22.5°C. The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture -Bamidgeh, 53 (2): 80-83
  3. Chiu Y.N., 1989. Considerations for feeding experiments to quantify dietary requirements of essential nutrients in fish. In: S.S. De Silva (ed.), Fish Nutrition in Asia, Special Publication No. 4, Asian Fisheries Society, Manila: 46-57
  4. Damsgârd B., Arnesen A.M., Baardvik B.M. and M. Jobling, 1997. State dependent feed acquisition among two strains of hatchery-reared Arctic charr. Journal of Fish Biology, 50: 859-869
  5. De Silva S.S. and T.A. Anderson, 1995. Fish Nutrition in Aquaculture. Chapman & Hall Aquaculture Series, London, 319 pp
  6. Goddard S., 1996. Feed Management in Intensive Aquaculture, Chapman & Hall, New York, 194 pp
  7. Hasan M.R., 2001. Nutrition and feeding for sustainable aquaculture development in the third millennium. In: R.P. Subasinghe, P. Bueno, MJ. Phillips, C. Hough, S.E. McGladdery and J.R. Arthur (Eds). Aquaculture in the Third Millennium. Technical Proceedings of the Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Millennium, Bangkok, Thailand, 20-25 February 2000. NACA, Bangkok and FAO, Rome: 193-219
  8. Jobling M. and B.M. Baardvik, 1994. The influence of environmental manipulation on inter- and intra-individual variation in food acquisition and growth performance of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. Journal of Fish Biology, 44: 1069-1087
  9. Jobling M., 1995. Fish Bioenergetics, Chapman & Hall, London, 309 pp. 10.Kaushik S.J. and E.F. Gomes, 1988. Effect of frequency of feeding on nitrogen and energy balance in rainbow trout under maintenance conditions, Aquaculture, 73: 207-216: 11.McCarthy I.D., Carter C.G. and D.F. Houlihan, 1992. The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Journal of Fish Biology, 41: 257-263. 12.Metcalfe N.B., 1986. Intraspecific variation in competitive ability and food intake in salmonids: consequences for energy budgets and growth rates, Journal of Fish Biology, 28: 525-531. 13.Okumuş, I. 2000. Coastal aquaculture: sustainable development, resource use and integrated environme