Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Computerized Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy of Intracranial Lesions: Report of 500 Consecutive Cases

Pages
395–400
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONClUSION: CT-guided stereotactic biopsy is a reliable and a safe procedure in cases with intracranial lesions when histopathological diagnosis is required for the appropriate treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIm: Computed tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic brain biopsy has been performed in our clinic since March 1998.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this prospective study, we examined the patient data undergoing stereotactic biopsy and the results of biopsies in 500 consecutive patients. mATERIAl and mEThODS: Between the dates of March 1998 and January 2015, CT-guided stereotactic biopsies were performed by using the Leksell stereotactic frame system (Elekta Instruments EU, Sweden) in 500 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONClUSION: CT-guided stereotactic biopsy is a reliable and a safe procedure in cases with intracranial lesions when histopathological diagnosis is required for the appropriate treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIm: Computed tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic brain biopsy has been performed in our clinic since March 1998. In this prospective study, we examined the patient data undergoing stereotactic biopsy and the results of biopsies in 500 consecutive patients. mATERIAl and mEThODS: Between the dates of March 1998 and January 2015, CT-guided stereotactic biopsies were performed by using the Leksell stereotactic frame system (Elekta Instruments EU, Sweden) in 500 patients. A total of 512 procedures were performed in patients consisting of 184 females (36.8%) and 316 males (63.2%), ages ranging from 3 to 81 years (mean 50.40±16.67). RESUlTS: Conclusive histopathological diagnosis was not achieved in 17(3.3%) of 512 procedures. Of the others, 173 (33.8%) were high-grade gliomas, 103 (20.1%) were low-grade gliomas, 36 (7%) were malignant lymphomas, 34 (6.6%) were other types of brain tumors, 82 (16%) were metastasis and 67 (13.1%) were non-tumoral lesions. Complications were occurred in ten cases: 3 tumoral bleedings, 2 hypertensive cerebral hematomas, 2 peroperative convulsions, 1 epidural hematoma, 1 myocardial infarction and 1 brain edema. The patients who developed myocardial infarction and hypertensive thalamic hematoma died. The mortality was 0.4% and morbidity was 1.6% in 512 procedures. CONClUSION: CT-guided stereotactic biopsy is a reliable and a safe procedure in cases with intracranial lesions when histopathological diagnosis is required for the appropriate treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, S. M., TÜRKMENOĞLU, O. N., TANIK, C., UYSAL, E., OZONER, B., KALDIRIMOGLU, S. A., MÜSLÜMAN, A. M., YILMAZ, A., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, H., BAYINDIR, Ç., AYDIN, Y. (2017). Computerized Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy of Intracranial Lesions: Report of 500 Consecutive Cases. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 395–400. https://ajindex.com/articles/404558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Air EL, Warnick RE, McPherson CM: Management strategies after nondiagnostic results with frameless stereotactic needle biopsy: Retrospective review of 28 patients. Surg Neurol Int 3 Suppl 4:315-319, 2012 2. Apuzzo ML, Chandrasoma PT, Cohen D, Zee CS, Zelman V: Computed imaging stereotaxy: Experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses. Neurosurgery 20: 930-937, 1987 3. Backlund EO: A new instrument for stereotaxic brain tumour biopsy. Technical note. Acta Chir Scand 137:825-827, 1971 4. Barlas O, Bayindir C, Can M, Idrisoglu HA, Savas A, Miyandoabci S: Image guided stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors. A study of 211 cases. Med Bull Istanbul 27:64-69, 1994 5. Bayindir C, Barlas O, Can M: Reliability of cytologic diagnosis of brain tumors in stereotactic biopsies. Med Bull Istanbul 28: 7-14, 1994 6. Bekelis K, Radwan TA, Desai A, Roberta DW: Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy: Feasibility, diagnostic yield and safety. J Neurosurg 116:1002-1006, 2012 7. Bernstein M, Parrent AG: Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 81:165-168, 1994 8. Calisaneller T, Ozdemir O, Ozger O, Ozen O, Kiyici H, Caner H, Altınors N: The accuracy and diagnostic yield of computerized tomography guided stereotactic biopsy in brain lesions. Turk Neurosurg 18:17-22, 2008 9. Chandrasoma PT, Smith MM, Apuzzo ML: Stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of brain masses: Comparison of results of biopsy and resected surgical specimen. Neurosurgery 24: 160-165, 1989 10. Chernov M, Muragaki Y, Taira T, Iseki H: H-MRS-guided stereotactic brain biopsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 90:63- 65, 2012 11. Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJJ, Vincent AJPE: Safety and efficiacy of frameless and frame based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150: 23-29, 2008 12. Dammers R, Schouten JW, Haitsma IK, Vincent AJPE, Kros JM, Dirven CMF: Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre. Acta Neurochir 152: 1915-1921, 2010 13. Ersahin M, Karaarslan N, Gurbuz MS, Hakan T, Berkman MZ, Ekinci O, Denizli N, Aker FV: The safety and diagnostic value of frame-based and CT-guided stereotactic brain biopsy technique. Turk Neurosurg 21:582-590, 2011 14. Field M, Witham TF, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD: Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 94: 545-551, 2001 15. Frati