Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

The Value of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Neurosurgery Operations

Nöroşirürji ameliyatlarında intraoperatif nörofizyolojik monitörizasyonun yeri ve önemi

Pages
1–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our article, we report importance and advantages of IONM in neurosurgical operations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Any manipulation or resection procedures during surgery of neural system or its surrounding structures carries a high risk of causing damage to the neural tissue.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Existing intraoperative imaging tools provide only information about anatomic situation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our article, we report importance and advantages of IONM in neurosurgical operations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Any manipulation or resection procedures during surgery of neural system or its surrounding structures carries a high risk of causing damage to the neural tissue. Existing intraoperative imaging tools provide only information about anatomic situation. Because of this insufficiency, both physicians and patients are displeased with additional neural deficits. Using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) that evaluate neurological function simultaneously is very important. It is also used in other surgical operations. In our article, we report importance and advantages of IONM in neurosurgical operations.

Özet

Sinir sistemi ya da çevre yapıların cerrahi girişimlerinde uygulanacak her türlü manipülasyon ve rezeksiyon girişimlerinin nöral dokuya zarar verme riski yüksektir. Mevcut intraoperatif görüntüleme araçları ancak anatomik durum hakkında bilgi vermektedir. Bu araçların nöral dokunun fonksiyonu hakkında bilgi verememesi hem hekimlerin hem de hastaların beklentilerini karşılayamamaktadır ve postoperatif dönemlerde ek nörolojik hasarlar görülebilmektedir. Nörofizyolojik işlevselliği eş zamanlı değerlendirmesi açısından intraoperatif nörofizyolojik monitörizasyon (İONM) kullanımı önem arz etmektedir. Diğer cerrahi branşlarda da kullanılmaktadır. Bu derlememizde İONM kullanımının nöro- şirürjideki önemi ve avantajlarından bahsedeceğiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

MÜSLÜMAN, A. M., MİRKHASİLOVA, M., ALTAS, K., CAN, S. M., KILIÇ, M., YİLMAZ, A., ÖZDEMİR, B. (2017). The Value of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Neurosurgery Operations. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/364153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Penfield W, Steelman H. The Treatment of Focal Epilepsy by Cortical Excision. Ann Surg 1947; 126: 740-61. [CrossRef] 2. Hilger J. Facial Nerve Stimulator. Trans Am Acad Ophth Otolaryngol 1964; 68: 74-6. 3. Vauzella C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973; 93: 173-8. [CrossRef] 4. McLain RF, Saavedra FM. Intraoperative nonparalytic monitoring. In: Benzel EC (ed). Spine Surgery: Techniques, Complication Avoidance, and Management. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/ Saunders; 2012. Chapter 179. p. 1701-3. 5. Lu Y, Qureshi SA. Cost Effectiveness Studies in Spine Surgeries: A Narrative Review. Spine J 2014; 14: 2748-62. [CrossRef] 6. Ertekin C. Somatosensoryal spinal ve Serebral Evoked Potansiyeller. In Ertekin C (ed) Santral ve Periferik EMG AnatomiFizyoloji-Klinik. İzmir Meta Basım 2006: 710-1. 7. Greenberg M. Electrodiagnostics. In Greenberg M. (ed) Handbook of Neurosurgery. Sixth Edition. New York: Thieme Publishers 2006: 145-8. 8. Aydınlar E. İntraoperatif Omurilik Monitörlenmesi. In Zileli M, Özer F (ed), Omurga ve Omurilik Cerrahisi. Üçüncü Baskı, Cilt 1, İzmir: İntertıp yayınevi, 2014: 413-9. 9. Waxman S. Somatosensory Systems S. In Waxman (ed), Clinical Neuroanatomy. 27th edition. China: Mc Geaw-Hill Education 2013: 277-83. 10. Moller A. Anatomy and Physiology of Motor Systems. In Moller A (ed). Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring. 2nd edition, Humana Press Inc: New Jersey 2006: 157-9. 11. Lopez JR, Chang SD, Steinberg GK.The use of electrophysiological monitoring in the intraoperative management of intracranial aneursyms J Neurol Neurosurg Physchiatry 1999: 66: 189-96. 12. Moller AR, Janetta PJ. Monitoring facial EMG during microvascular decompression operations for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 1987; 66: 681-5. [CrossRef] 13. Maguire J, Wallace S, Madiga R, Leppanen R, Draper V. Evaluation of intrapedicular screw position using intraoperative evoked electromyography. Spine1995; 20: 1068-74. [CrossRef] 14. Sala F, Palandri G, Basso E, Lanteri P, Deletis V, Faccioli F, et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study.Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 1129-43; discussion 1129-43. [CrossRef] 15. Kothbauer KF, Novak K. Intraoperative monitoring for tethered cord surgery: an update. Neurosurg Focus 15; 2004; 16: E8.