Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Different Neuro-Cognitive & NeuroPedagogical Modalities and Applications on NeuroCognitive Development

Çeşitli Nöro-Bilişsel & Nöro-Pedagojik Uygulama ve Modalitelerin Bilişsel Becerilerin Gelişimi Üzerindeki Etkisi

Pages
679–696
Publication Date
2016-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Throughout the course of the constitution of our manuscript, the chief focus of our concern has been to bring under daylight the related sources of educational neuroscience, drowing from qualitatively-inspired metainterpretations and meta-evaluations and inspired from approaches based on descriptive methodologies and perspectives about these neuro pedagogical modalities

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, educational neuroscience, as an emerging field unleashing its postulates within the context of interdisciplinary research and explorations, has deeply affected 21st century global pedagogical policies and approaces.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has also led to important discoveries related with the workings of human brain, illuminating various neuro-cognitive phenomena, which has led to the adoption of a new understanding and approach about learning processes and triggered brand-new perspectives and paradigm shifts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Throughout the course of the constitution of our manuscript, the chief focus of our concern has been to bring under daylight the related sources of educational neuroscience, drowing from qualitatively-inspired metainterpretations and meta-evaluations and inspired from approaches based on descriptive methodologies and perspectives about these neuro pedagogical modalities
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biliş · pedagoji · sinirbilim

Abstract

In recent years, educational neuroscience, as an emerging field unleashing its postulates within the context of interdisciplinary research and explorations, has deeply affected 21st century global pedagogical policies and approaces. It has also led to important discoveries related with the workings of human brain, illuminating various neuro-cognitive phenomena, which has led to the adoption of a new understanding and approach about learning processes and triggered brand-new perspectives and paradigm shifts. These developments have made it necessary to apply a variety of neuro-cognitive modalities to learning environments as a result of observation of a number of positive pedagogical improvements and outputs, which have played a mediating role in the betterment and regulation of neuro-cognitive processes. Throughout the course of the constitution of our manuscript, the chief focus of our concern has been to bring under daylight the related sources of educational neuroscience, drowing from qualitatively-inspired metainterpretations and meta-evaluations and inspired from approaches based on descriptive methodologies and perspectives about these neuro pedagogical modalities

Özet

Son yıllarda, küresel pedagojik anlayışlara damgasını vuran eğitimsel sinirbilim educational neuroscience gibi disiplinlerarası alanlar düzeyinde gerçekleştirilen birtakım keşif ve araştırmalar 21. yüzyılın pedagojilerini derinden etkileyerek önemli nöro-bilişsel sonuçlar doğurmuştur; eğitim-öğretim süreçlerinde beyin tabanlı anlayışların benimsenmesine yol açan ve paradigma değişimini tetikleyen bu gelişmeler çeşitli nöro-bilişsel modalitelerin eğitim ortamlarına uygulanmasını gerekli kılmış ve bunun sonucunda farklı boyutlarda olumlu birtakım pedagojik iyileşme ve çıktıların gözlemlenmesinin yanında zihinsel, nöro-bilişsel süreç ve mekanizmaların düzenlenmesine ve iyileşmesine de aracılık etmiştir. Kaynak taraması ve betimsel bir bakış açısı benimsenilerek ve niteliksel metodolojilerden esinlenilerek gerçekleştirilen bu çalışma sinirbilimsel eğitim alanında ortaya konulmuş çeşitli interdisipliner keşif ve araştırmaların sonuçlarının çeşitli nöro pedegojik modaliteler bağlamında değerlendirilmesini ve bilişsel süreçlerin nasıl etkilenebileceği ile ilgili üst-anlatımsal ve üst-yorumsal bir perspektif geliştirilerek literatür taramasına dayalı bir yaklaşımı öngören niteliksel değerlendirmeler ortaya koymayı hedeflemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, M. Ş., USTA, M. E., YAYLA, A., TAŞKIN, N., HASTUNÇ, Y., ALAV, Ö. (2016). The Effect of Different Neuro-Cognitive & NeuroPedagogical Modalities and Applications on NeuroCognitive Development. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 679–696. https://ajindex.com/articles/402238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Araya, D. (2013). Thinking forward: Vivek Wadhwa on singularity university. ELearning and Digital Media, 10(3), 320. doi:10.2304/elea.2013.10.3.320. Back, K. W. (2015). The mediating effects of hope between attitude toward school physical education, academic stress, ego-resilience, and psychological wellbeing of high school students. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S7), 596. doi:10.17485/ijst/2015/v8is7/70446. Balcı, A. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma. Ankara:
  2. PegemA. Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and inhibition. Neuropsychologia, 65, 313–319. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.012. Briner, R. B. (2000). Relationships between work environments, psychological environments and psychological well-being. Occupational Medicine, 50 (5), 299– 303. doi:10.1093/occmed/50.5.299. Brown, T. T., & Daly, A. J. (2016). Welcome to educational Neuroscience. Educational Neuroscience, 1 (0),. doi:10.1177/2377616116632069.
  3. Caspar, E. A., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2015). The relationship between human agency and embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 226–236. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.007. Dixon, M., & Senior, K. (2011). Appearing pedagogy: From embodied learning and teaching to embodied pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19 (3), 473–484. doi:10.1080/14681366.2011.632514. Domschke, K. (2015). Our genes, our choices - by David Goldman. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 14(5), 440–441. doi:10.1111/gbb.12219. Gardner, H. (2008).
  4. Quandaries for Neuroeducators. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(4), 165–169. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228x.2008.00050.x. Gleeson, J. G. (2003). Building a better brain. Development, 130(23), 5563–5564. doi:10.1242/dev.00754. Hárai, D. (2015). The crisis of intellectuality. Hungarian Educational Researcch Journal, 2015(4),. doi:10.14413/herj2015.04.06. Hossin, M. Z. (2016). From habitual sleep hours to morbidity and mortality: Existing evidence, potential mechanisms, and future agenda. Sleep Health. doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2016.01.006. http://developingchild.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Enhancing-andPracticing-Executive-Function-Skills-with-Children-from-Infancy-toAdolescence-1.pdf. Erişim tarihi:16/04/2016. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/research/sovc2010chapter5.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 20.06.2016.
  5. Hübler, A. W., Foster, G. C., & Phelps, K. C. (2007). Managing chaos: Thinking out of the box. Complexity, 12(3), 10–13. doi:10.1002/cplx.20159. Joiner, E. G., & Restak, R. M. (1983). The bra