Ibn Taymiyyah has tried to prove that Shi’a’s claims in question have no base in both intelligence and traditional proofs, especially that of their claims concerning with that imams have been infallible or innocent ones according to their concept of Ahl al-Bayt.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the tradition of Islamic thought, the concept of "Ahl al-Bayt" was argued and to a certain degree it was perceived as a basic religious and even political dominant element by Shi’a.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the tradition of Islamic thought, the concept of "Ahl al-Bayt" was argued and to a certain degree it was perceived as a basic religious and even political dominant element by Shi’a.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ibn Taymiyyah has tried to prove that Shi’a’s claims in question have no base in both intelligence and traditional proofs, especially that of their claims concerning with that imams have been infallible or innocent ones according to their concept of Ahl al-Bayt.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:...
Abstract
In the tradition of Islamic thought, the concept of "Ahl al-Bayt" was argued and to a certain degree it was perceived as a basic religious and even political dominant element by Shi’a. Ibn Taymiyyah has tried to prove that Shi’a’s claims in question have no base in both intelligence and traditional proofs, especially that of their claims concerning with that imams have been infallible or innocent ones according to their concept of Ahl al-Bayt.
YAVUZ, S. S. (2004). Ibn Taymiyyah’s Approach to Ahl al-Bayt in the Context of Relation Between Imamah (Religious Leadership) and Innocence. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 181–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/401029