Journals / Gıda / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Antifungal Activity of Propolis Samples Collected from Different Geographical Regions of Turkey against Two Food-Related Molds, Aspergillus versicolor and Penicillium aurantiogriseum (in English)

Türkiye’nin Farklı Coğrafik Bölgelerinden Toplanan Propolis Örneklerinin Aspergillus versicolor ve Penicillium aurantiogriseum’e Karşı Antifungal Aktiviteleri (İngilizce)

Journal
Gıda
Pages
135–142
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that a higher EEP concentration was necessary for the inhibitory effect on mycelial growth of P. auantiogriseum comparing with A. versicolor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate antifungal activities of 10 propolis samples collected from various geographical regions of Turkey against 2 important food-related mycotoxin producer molds, Aspergillus versicolor and Penicillium aurantiogriseum.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Antifungal activities of EEP samples were tested at 3 different concentrations of 1%, 5% and 10% (v/v) by determination percentage of mycelial growth inhibition of the mold strains on Potato Dextrose Agar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that a higher EEP concentration was necessary for the inhibitory effect on mycelial growth of P. auantiogriseum comparing with A. versicolor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Propolis · antifungal aktivite · gıda kaynaklı küfler

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate antifungal activities of 10 propolis samples collected from various geographical regions of Turkey against 2 important food-related mycotoxin producer molds, Aspergillus versicolor and Penicillium aurantiogriseum. Chemical compositions of ethyl alcohol extracts of the propolis (EEP) samples were determined by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Antifungal activities of EEP samples were tested at 3 different concentrations of 1%, 5% and 10% (v/v) by determination percentage of mycelial growth inhibition of the mold strains on Potato Dextrose Agar. Main organic components of EEP samples were flavonoids, aromatic alcohols, aromatic acid esters, aliphatic acid esters, aromatic acids, alcohols and aromatic hydrocarbons. All EEP samples at 10% concentration showed 100% inhibition on mycelial growth of both mold strains. Antifungal activities of EEP samples against the mold strains were variable at 1% and 5% concentrations. The results indicated that a higher EEP concentration was necessary for the inhibitory effect on mycelial growth of P. auantiogriseum comparing with A. versicolor. Percentage of flavonoids in the effective propolis samples was considerably higher than the others. These results indicated that propolis samples had a marked antifungal action against both mold strains depending on EEP concentration and chemical composition.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin çeşitli coğrafik bölgelerinden toplanan 10 propolis örneğinin mikotoksin üreticisi olan, gıda kaynaklı iki küf (Aspergillus versicolor ve Penicillium aurantiogriseum) suşuna karşı antifungal aktivitelerini araştırmaktır. Propolis örneklerinin etil alkol ekstraktlarının (EEP) kimyasal kompozisyonları kütle spektorometresine birleştirilmiş gaz kromatografisi ile belirlenmiştir. EEP örneklerinin antifungal aktiviteleri %1, %5 ve %10 olacak şekilde üç farklı konsantrasyonda test edilmiştir. EEP örneklerinin antifungal aktiviteleri, incelenen küf suşunun Patates Dekstroz Agar besiyeri yüzeyindeki misel gelişiminde meydana gelen inhibisyonun yüzdesi şeklinde belirlenmiştir. EEP örneklerinin ana bileşenleri flavonoitler, aromatik alkoller, aromatik asit esterler, alifatik asit esterler, aromatik asitler, alkoller ve aromatik hidrokarbonlar olarak tespit edilmiştir. EEP örneklerinin tümü %10 konsantrasyonda her iki küf suşunun misel gelişimi üzerinde %100 inhibisyon sağlamıştır. EEP örneklerinin iki küf suşu üzerindeki antifungal etkisi %1 ve %5 konsantrasyonlarında değişkenlik göstermiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, P. aurantiogriseum suşunun misel gelişimi üzerinde inhibisyon etkisi yaratması için A. versicolor’a kıyasla daha yüksek bir EEP konsantrasyonuna gereksinim olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Küf suşları üzerinde etkin olan propolis örneklerinin flavonoit yüzdesi diğer bileşenlerin yüzdesinden oldukça daha yüksektir. Bu sonuçlar, propolis örneklerinin EEP konsantrasyonuna ve kimyasal kompozisyonuna bağlı olarak iki küf suşu üzerinde de belirgin kuvvette bir antifungal etki yarattığına işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZ, A., MUMCU, A. Ş., TÜYLÜ, A. Ö., SORKUN, K., SALİH, B. (2013). Antifungal Activity of Propolis Samples Collected from Different Geographical Regions of Turkey against Two Food-Related Molds, Aspergillus versicolor and Penicillium aurantiogriseum (in English). Gıda, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 135–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/39526

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sweeney MJ, Dobson ADW. 1998.
  2. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicilliumspecies. Int J Food Microbiol, 43: 141-158. Fleet G. 1992. Spoilage yeasts. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 12: 1-14.
  3. Fuglsang C, Johnson G, Christgau S. 1995. Antimicrobial enzymes: Applications and future potential in food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol, 6 (2): 390-399.
  4. Brul E, Coote P. 1997. Novel antifungal strategies of potential use to the food industry. Food Chem Toxicol, 35 (4): 720-726.
  5. Varanda E, Monti R, Tavares DC. 1999. Inhibitory effect of propolis and bee venom on the mutagenicity of some direct- and indirect-acting mutagens. J Carcinog, 19 (4): 403-419. Ghisalberti EL. 1979. Propolis: A Review. Bee World, 60: 59-84. Crane E. 1990. Bees and Beekeeping: Science, Practice and World Resources. Cornstock Publishing, Ithaca, NY., USA, 614 p. Sorkun K, Suer B, Salih B. 2001. Determination of chemical composition of Turkish propolis. Z Naturforsch, 56: 666-668.
  6. Greenaway W, Scaybrook T, Whatley FR. 1990. The composition and plant origin of propolis. Mycologia, 72 (2): 107-118. Burdock GA. 1998. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol, 36: 347-363.
  7. Cafarchia C, De Laurentis N, Milillo MA, Losacco V, Puccini V. 1999. Antifungal activity of Apulia region propolis. Parassitologia, 4 (12): 5870-5880. Lindenfelser LA. 1967. Antimicrobial activity of propolis. Am Bee J, 107 (3): 90-92, 130-131.
  8. Grange JM, Davey RW. 1990. Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue). J Roy Soc Med, 83: 159-160.
  9. Dobrowolski JW, Vohora SB, Sharma K, Shah SA, Naqvi SAH, Dandiya PC. 1991. Antibacterial, antifungal,antiamoebic, anti inflammatory and antipyretic studies on propolis bee products. J Ethnopharmacol, 35: 77-82.
  10. Kujumgiev A, Bankova V, Ignatova A, Popov S. 1993. Antibacterial activity of propolis, some of its components and their analogs. Pharmazie, 48: 785-786. Marcucci MC. 1995. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie, 26: 83–99.
  11. Kujumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Y, Bankova V, Christov R, Popov S. 1999. Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis of different geographic origin. J Ethnopharmacol, 64: 235-240.
  12. Nivea M, Isla M, Cudmani NG, Vattuone MA, Sampietro AR.1999. Screning of antibacterial activity of Amaicha del Valle (Tucuman, Argentina) propolis. J. Ethnopharmacol, 68: 97-102.
  13. Hegazi AG, Abd El Hady FK, Abd Allah FA. 2000. Chemical composition and a