SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 51

Effective Tax Burden on Labour, Capital, and Consumption in Turkey: 2006-2019

Türkiye’de Emek, Sermaye ve Tüketim Üzerindeki Efektif Vergi Yükü: 2006-2019

Birsen NACAR
Yakup KARABACAK
Pages
487–510
Publication Date
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research results show that the effective tax burden on labour is higher than the effective tax burden on capital and consumption in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to measure the effective tax burden on labour, capital, and consumption in Turkey for the 2006-2019 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we use the MRT method to measure the effective tax burden with some improvements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research results show that the effective tax burden on labour is higher than the effective tax burden on capital and consumption in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Efektif Vergi Yükü · Ortalama Efektif Vergi Oranı · Örtük Vergi Oranı

Abstract

This article aims to measure the effective tax burden on labour, capital, and consumption in Turkey for the 2006-2019 period. In this study, we use the MRT method to measure the effective tax burden with some improvements. According to this method, the effective tax burden is calculated as tax revenues divided by the associated tax base taken from national accounts. The research results show that the effective tax burden on labour is higher than the effective tax burden on capital and consumption in Turkey. In addition, it turns out that taxes on labour and consumption are more sensitive to economic cycles. However, it is revealed that taxes on capital fluctuate according to changes in tax laws.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, Türkiye’de 2006-2019 dönemi için emek, sermaye ve tüketim üzerindeki efektif vergi yükünü ölçmektir. Bu çalışmada efektif vergi yükünü ölçmek için bazı düzeltmelerle MRT metodu kullanılmaktadır. Bu metoda göre, efektif vergi yükü, vergi gelirlerinin ulusal hesaplardan alınan ilişkili vergi matrahına bölünmesiyle elde edilen oran olarak hesaplanmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçları Türkiye’de emek üzerindeki efektif vergi yükünün sermaye ve tüketim üzerindeki efektif vergi yükünden daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca emek gelirleri ve tüketim harcamaları üzerinden alınan vergilerin ekonomik çevrimlere daha duyarlığı olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Ancak sermaye üzerinden alınan vergilerin ise vergi yasalarında yapılan değişikliklere göre dalgalanma gösterdiği ortaya çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

NACAR, B., KARABACAK, Y. (2022). Effective Tax Burden on Labour, Capital, and Consumption in Turkey: 2006-2019. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 51, 487–510. https://ajindex.com/articles/393726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bellak, C. & M. Leibrecht (2007), “Corporate Income Tax Competition and the Scope for National Tax Policy in the Enlarged Europe”, in: K. Andersson et al. (eds.) National Tax Policy in Europe: To be or Not to Be? (11-43),
  2. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Carey, D. & H. Tchilinguirian (2000), “Average Effective Tax rates on Capital, Labour and Consumption”, Economics Department Working Papers, 258, Paris: OECD Economic Department. Carey, D. & J. Rabesona (2004), “Tax Rations on Labor and Capital Income and on Consumption”, in: P.B. Sørensen (ed.), Measuring Taxes on Capital and Labor (213-262),
  3. CESifo Seminar Series, London: The MIT Press.
  4. Clark, W.S. (2004), “Using Micro-Data to Assess Average Tax Rates”, in: P.B. Sørensen (ed.), Measuring Taxes on Capital and Labor (319-358),
  5. CESifo Seminar Series, London: The MIT Press.
  6. Devereux, M.P. & R. Griffith (1999), “The taxation of discrete investment choices”, IFS Working Paper Series No. W98/16. Elele, O. (2009) “Küresel krize karşı Türkiye’de alınan önlemler”, Dünya Gazetesi (29 Ağustos 2009), 26.10.2021.
  7. European Commission (2020), Taxation Trends in the European Union Data For The EU Member States, Iceland and Norway, (2020 Edition), Directorete-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı (2007), 2006-2020 Yılı Faaliyet Raporları,, 10.12.2020.
  8. Gordon, R. et al. (2003), “Do we now collect any tax revenue from taxing capital income?”, Journal of Public Economics, 88, 981-1009. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı (2020a), Genel Yönetim Bütçe Gelirleri Ekod4 2019,, 15.12.2020. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı (2020b), Genel Yönetim Bütçe Gelirleri Ekod4 2011-2018,, 15.12.2020. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı (2020c), Merkezi Yönetim Bütçe Gelirleri Ekod4 2006-2010,, 15.12.2020. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı (2020d), Mahalli İdareler Bütçe Gelirleri Ekod4 2006-2010,, 15.12.2020.
  9. Jacobs, O.H. & C. Spengel (1999), “The Effective Average Tax Burden in the European Union and the USA A Computer-based Calculation and Comparison with the Model of the European Tax Analyzer”, ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 99-54, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim. Jacobs, O.H. & C. Spengel (2002), “Effective Tax Burden in Europe”, ZEW Economic Studies, 15, Heidelberg/ New York. King, M.A. & D. Fullerton (1984), The Taxation of Income From Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, United Kingdom, Sweden, and West Germany, Chicago: Un