Journals / Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON RESPONSIVENESS IN HEALTH SYSTEMS

SAĞLIK SİSTEMLERİNDE CEVAP VEREBİLİRLİK ÜZERİNE SİSTEMATİK BİR DERLEME

Pages
86–95
Publication Date
2022-03-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained from this study on responsiveness studies, by presenting a holistic and in-depth perspective, can guide the studies to be carried out in the evaluation of the health system at the national level and bring the studies to the agenda.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aims to analyze international studies on responsiveness in health systems by systematic review method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, the "PRISMA" directive developed for systematic reviews and meta-analyses was used, and 27 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained from this study on responsiveness studies, by presenting a holistic and in-depth perspective, can guide the studies to be carried out in the evaluation of the health system at the national level and bring the studies to the agenda.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:sağlık politikası · Cevap verebilirlik · kalite

Abstract

The present study aims to analyze international studies on responsiveness in health systems by systematic review method. In the study, the "PRISMA" directive developed for systematic reviews and meta-analyses was used, and 27 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the greatest number of studies on responsiveness in health systems were carried out in 2017 (n=5) and the country with the most studies was Iran (25.9%). In most of the studies reviewed, outpatients and inpatients (29.6%) were evaluated together. Respectful treatment (25.9%), confidentiality (22.2%) and social support (18.5%) get the highest scores from the responsiveness sub-dimensions; the lowest scoring dimensions are choice (37.04%) and autonomy (25.9%). In addition, it was determined that its responsiveness was affected by variables such as gender, age, education level, place of residence and service type. The measurement of responsiveness is used in the performance evaluation of both the general health system and specific health services. The findings obtained from this study on responsiveness studies, by presenting a holistic and in-depth perspective, can guide the studies to be carried out in the evaluation of the health system at the national level and bring the studies to the agenda.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sağlık sistemlerinde cevap verebilirlik üzerine yapılan uluslararası çalışmaların sistematik derleme yöntemi ile analiz edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada, sistematik incelemeler ve meta analizleri için geliştirilen “PRISMA” yönergesi kullanılmış, belirlenen dahil edilme kriterleri doğrultusunda ulaşılan 27 çalışma araştırma kapsamına alınmıştır. İnceleme sonucunda sağlık sistemlerinde cevap verebilirlik üzerine yapılmış çalışmaların en fazla 2017 yılında gerçekleştirildiği (n=5) ve en fazla çalışma yapılan ülkenin İran (%25.9) olduğu belirlenmiştir. İncelenen çalışmaların büyük kısmında ayakta ve yatan hastalar (%29.6) birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Cevap verebilirlik alt boyutlarından en yüksek puanı alan alt boyutlar, saygılı tedavi (%25.9), gizlilik (%22.2) ve sosyal destek (%18.5); en düşük puanı alan boyutlar, seçim (%37.04) ve otonomi (%25.9)’dir. Ayrıca cevap verebilirliğinin cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim seviyesi, yerleşim yeri ve hizmet türü gibi değişkenlerden etkilendiği saptanmıştır. Cevap verebilirliğin ölçümü, hem genel sağlık sistemi hem de belirli sağlık hizmetlerinin performans değerlendirmesinde kullanılmaktadır. Cevap verebilirlik çalışmaları üzerinde yapılan bu araştırmada elde edilen bulgular, bütüncül ve derinlemesine bir perspektif sunarak, ulusal düzeyde sağlık sisteminin değerlendirilmesinde yapılacak çalışmalara rehber olabilir, çalışmaların gündeme gelmesini sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURUR, F., AKBULUT, Y. (2022). A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON RESPONSIVENESS IN HEALTH SYSTEMS. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 86–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/390951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sargutan AE. Sağlık sektörü ve sağlık sistemlerinin yapısı. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi 2005; 8(3): 400-428
  2. Baharvand P. Responsiveness of the health system towards patients admitted to west of Iran hospitals. Electronic Journal of General Medicine 2019; 16(2): 1-7
  3. DSÖ. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance.World Health Organization, Genava 2000
  4. Uğurluoğlu Ö, Çelik Y. Sağlık Sistemleri Performans Ölçümü, Önemi ve Dünya Sağlık Örgütü Yaklaşımı. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi 2005; 8(1): 3-29
  5. Ebrahimipour H, Najjar AV, Jahani AK, et al. Health system responsiveness: a case study of general hospitals in Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag 2013; 1(1): 85-90
  6. Awoke MA, Negin J, Moller J, et al. Predictors of public and private healthcare utilization and associated health system responsiveness among older adults in Ghana. Glob Health Action 2017; 10(1): 1-10
  7. Mirzoev T, Kane S. What is health systems responsiveness? Review of existing knowledge and proposed conceptual framework. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2(4): 1-11
  8. Hsu CC, Chen L, Hu YW, Yıp W, Shu CC. The dimensions of responsiveness of a health system: a Taiwanese perspective. BMC Public Health 2006; 6(1): 72-79
  9. De Silva AA. Framework for Measuring Responsiveness. World Health Organization, Genava 2000
  10. Valentine N, Darby C, Bonsel GJ. Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of “health systems responsiveness” in 41 countries, Social science & medicine. 2008; 66(9): 1939-1950
  11. Akalın B. Sağlık Sisteminde Cevap Verebilirlik. Hiperyayın, İstanbul 2018
  12. Darby C, Valentina N, Murray CJL, De Silva A. World Health Organization (WHO):Strategy On Measuring Responsiveness. World Health Organization, Genava 2000
  13. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Villanueva M, et al. WHO multi-country survey study on health and responsiveness. World Health Organization, Genava 2001
  14. Coulter A, Jenkinson C. European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15(4): 355-360
  15. Adesanya T, Gbolahan O, Ghannam O, et al. Exploring the responsiveness of public and private hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria. J Public Health Res 2012, 1(1), 2-7
  16. Rottger J, Blumel M, Fuchs S, Busse R. Assessing the responsiveness of chronic disease care-Is the World Health Organization's concept of health system responsiveness applicable?. Social Science & Me