Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Outcomes of early cholecystectomy (within 7 days of admission) for acute cholecystitis according to diagnosis and severity grading by Tokyo 2013 Guideline

Pages
80–86
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Early cholecystectomy in Acute cholecystitis performed by experienced surgeons after 72 hr of admission and within 7 daysmaybe a feasible and safe procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The timing of early cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis is still controversial, and data regarding theuse of Tokyo 2013 guideline for diagnosis and severity grading in Acute Cholecystitis is limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this studywas to evaluate the clinical and pathologic outcomes of early cholecystectomy after 72 hr and within seven daysof index admission according to Tokyo 2013 guideline for diagnosis and severity grading of Acute cholecystitis (inpatients with Acute cholecystitis.Material and Methods: Medical charts of 172 patients who underwent early cholecystectomy after 72 hr and within7 days of index admission with a diagnosis of Acute cholecystitis between Aug 2009 and Apr 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Early cholecystectomy in Acute cholecystitis performed by experienced surgeons after 72 hr of admission and within 7 daysmaybe a feasible and safe procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The timing of early cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis is still controversial, and data regarding theuse of Tokyo 2013 guideline for diagnosis and severity grading in Acute Cholecystitis is limited. The aim of this studywas to evaluate the clinical and pathologic outcomes of early cholecystectomy after 72 hr and within seven daysof index admission according to Tokyo 2013 guideline for diagnosis and severity grading of Acute cholecystitis (inpatients with Acute cholecystitis.Material and Methods: Medical charts of 172 patients who underwent early cholecystectomy after 72 hr and within7 days of index admission with a diagnosis of Acute cholecystitis between Aug 2009 and Apr 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified according Tokyo 2013 guideline criteria.Results: The median age of the study group was 52 yr. The rates of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomies was53.5% and 33.1%, respectively. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was performed in 19 patients (13.4 %). Themedian length of hospital stay was 7 days. Eighty-four patients (59.2%) met the criteria for a definite diagnosis ofAcute cholecystitis according to Tokyo 2013 guideline. Longer postoperative and total length of hospital stay wasdetermined in patients with a definite diagnosis.Conclusion: Increased severity grading is correlated with longer pre- and post-operative hospital stay. Early cholecystectomy in Acute cholecystitis performed by experienced surgeons after 72 hr of admission and within 7 daysmaybe a feasible and safe procedure.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERT, İ., İPEKÇİ, F., ENGİN, Ö., KARAOĞLAN, M., ÇETİNDAĞ, Ö. (2017). Outcomes of early cholecystectomy (within 7 days of admission) for acute cholecystitis according to diagnosis and severity grading by Tokyo 2013 Guideline. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 80–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/390542

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Shaffer EA. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 20: 981-996. [CrossRef] Duncan CB, Riall TS. Evidence-based current surgical practice: calculous gallbladder disease. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 2011- 2025.
  2. Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symp- toms and complications in individuals with asymptomic gall- stones. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 734-738. [CrossRef] Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Pashad R, et al. Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cho- lecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endoscopy 2004; 7: 1323-1327. [CrossRef] Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Manage- ment of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 642-645. [CrossRef] Lai PB, Kwong KH,.Leung KL, Kwok SP, Chan AC, Chung SC, et al. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecys- tectomyfor acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1998; 4: 461-467.
  3. Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus de- layed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Surg 2008; 1: 40- 47. [CrossRef] Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C, Davidson BR. Early versus de- layed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute chole- cystittis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 30: CD005440. Zhou MW, Gu XD, Xiang JB, Chen ZY. Comparison of Clinical Safe- ty and Outcomes of Early versus Delayed Laproscopic Cholecys- tectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-analysis. Scient World J 2014; 274516. Yamashita Y, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gouma DJ, Garden OJ, et al. TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis. J Hep- atobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 89-96. [CrossRef] Al-Mulhim AA. Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JSLS 2008; 12: 282-287.
  4. Gutt CN, Encke J, Köninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmüller K, et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystecto- my, a multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 2013; 3: 385-393. [CrossRef] Agresta F, Ansaloni L,Baiocchi GL, Bergamini C, Campanile FC, Carlucci M, et al. Laparoscopc approach to acute abdomen from the consensus development conference of the Society Italiana di Chirurghi Endoscopica a nouve technologie(SICE), Associazione Chirurghia Ospedalieri Italiani(ACOI), Societa Italıana di Chirurgia (SIC), Socie