SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Development and validity and reliability study of a Turkish Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale

Huriye KARATAŞ
Meral KELLECİ
Pages
263–271
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: A Turkish Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale for nurses was created with 18 valid and reliable items with 4 subscales: symptom identification, use of knowledge, intervention, and diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of the present study was to develop a valid and reliable Turkish self-assessment tool to measure the psychosocial competency of nurses working in general clinics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The sample used for this methodological study consisted of 300 nurses working in the general clinics of Sivas Cumhuriyet University Health Services Practice and Research Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: A Turkish Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale for nurses was created with 18 valid and reliable items with 4 subscales: symptom identification, use of knowledge, intervention, and diagnosis.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to develop a valid and reliable Turkish self-assessment tool to measure the psychosocial competency of nurses working in general clinics. Methods: The sample used for this methodological study consisted of 300 nurses working in the general clinics of Sivas Cumhuriyet University Health Services Practice and Research Hospital. A personal information form and the Psychoso cial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale were used to collect the data. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis of the data. Results: The content-scope validity and construct validity were created for the draft scale using items selected from the related literature. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed for construct validity. The reliability of the scale was evaluated using item, internal consistency, and test-retest analysis. The EFA re sults indicated that 4 factors explained 70.44% of the total variance. CFA revealed that the data set was an acceptable model with excellent fit. The internal consistency coefficient of the entire scale was 0.93 and that of the subscales was found to be 0.80–0.93. Conclusion: A Turkish Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale for nurses was created with 18 valid and reliable items with 4 subscales: symptom identification, use of knowledge, intervention, and diagnosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAŞ, H., KELLECİ, M. (2021). Development and validity and reliability study of a Turkish Psychosocial Care Competence Self-Assessment Scale. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 263–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/389487

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Özkan S, Armay Z. Psiko-onkoloji. İstanbul: Form Reklam Hizmetleri; 2007
  2. Gorman LM, Sultan DF. Psikososyal Hemşirelik: Genel Hasta Bakımı İçin (Translation Editor, Öz F, Demiralp M). 3rd ed., Ankara: Akademisyen Tıp Kitabevi; 2014 3. Townsend MC. Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing. Concepts of Care in Evidence-Baced Practice. Philadelphia: Davis Company; 2015
  3. Mayda H, Güzel Hİ, Görücü Y, Bağcıoğlu E. The evaluation of psychiatry consultation requested in a university hospital. J Clin Anal Med 2015;6(Suppl 2):177–80
  4. Legg MJ. What is psychosocial care and how can nurses better provide it to adult oncology patients. Aust J Adv Nurs 2011;28:61–7
  5. Csaszar N, Ganju A, Mirnics ZS, Varga PP. Psychosocial issues in the cancer patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(Suppl 22):S26–30
  6. Hicks S. The psychiatric nurse in liaison psychiatry. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1989;23:89–96
  7. Özdemir Ü, Taşçı S. Psychosocıal problems and care of chronıc dıseases. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 2013;1:57–72
  8. Alaca Ç, Yiğit R, Özcan A. Comparison of nurses’ and patients’ opinions about their experiences during the disease process of ınpatients in the ıntensive care unit. J Psychiatric Nurse 2011;2:69–74
  9. Botti M, Endacott R, Watts R, Cairns J, Lewis K, Kenny A. Barriers in providing psychosocial support for patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 2006;29:309–16
  10. Spade CM, Fitzsimmons K, Houser J. Reliability testing of the psychosocial vital signs assessment tool. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2015;53:39–45
  11. Kocaman N. Psychosocial care in a general hospital practice and psyciatric consultation liaison nursing. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2005;9:49–51
  12. Kocaman N. Factors that affected of psychosocial reactions of patients. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2008;11:101–12
  13. Özkan S. Consultation liaison psychiatry; conceptions, institualization, practice. Türkiye Klinikleri J Int Med Sci 2006;2:1–13
  14. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Siminerio LM. Physician and nurse use of psychosocial strategies in diabetes care: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1256–62
  15. Yürün Y. Hastanede Çalışan Hemşirelerin Hasta Bakım Davranışlarının Belirlenmesi. [Yüksek lisans tezi] Lefkoşa: KKTC Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2015
  16. Karagöz Y. SPSS ve AMOS Uygulamalı Nicel – Nitel – Karma. Bilimsel Araş