SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Functional status, disability and quality of life in subacromial impingement syndrome

Subakromiyal sıkışma sendromunda fonksiyonel durum, özürlülük ve yaşam kalitesi

Afitap İÇAĞASIOĞLU
Zerrin KARATAŞ
Saime REYHANOĞLU
Şeyma KOLUKISA
Gülden TOPLU
Huriye ARAS
Esma DEMİRHAN
Pages
133–136
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patients were applied Constant, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) and Short form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires after given detailed information.SF-36 parameters of physical function, role physical and role emotional parameters showed a significiant correlation with the Constant and UCLA scores (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to evaluate the comparison between the functional status, disability and quality of life questionnaires in subacromial impingement syndrome.One hundred patients were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to evaluate the comparison between the functional status, disability and quality of life questionnaires in subacromial impingement syndrome.One hundred patients were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patients were applied Constant, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) and Short form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires after given detailed information.SF-36 parameters of physical function, role physical and role emotional parameters showed a significiant correlation with the Constant and UCLA scores (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the comparison between the functional status, disability and quality of life questionnaires in subacromial impingement syndrome.One hundred patients were included in this study. The patients were applied Constant, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) and Short form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires after given detailed information.SF-36 parameters of physical function, role physical and role emotional parameters showed a significiant correlation with the Constant and UCLA scores (p

Özet

Bu çalışma, subakromiyal sıkışma sendromlu hastalarda omuza özgül fonksiyonel durum ve özürlülüğü içeren ölçeklerle, yaşam kalitesi ölçeği SF-36 arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek amacıyla planlandı.Çalışmaya 100 hasta alındı. Hastalara ayrıntılı bilgi verildikten sonra, Constant, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Omuz Özürlülük Sorgulaması (OÖS) ve SF-36 sorgulamaları yapıldı.Constant ve UCLA’nın her ikisiyle SF-36’nın fiziksel fonksiyon, fiziksel rol, emosyonel rol parametreleri arasında anlamlı pozitif ilişki vardı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

İÇAĞASIOĞLU, A., KARATAŞ, Z., REYHANOĞLU, S., KOLUKISA, Ş., TOPLU, G., ARAS, H., DEMİRHAN, E. (2022). Functional status, disability and quality of life in subacromial impingement syndrome. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 133–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/526310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akman Ş, Küçükkaya M: Subakromiyal sıkışma sendromu: Patogenez, klinik ve muayene yöntemleri. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 37(Suppl 1): 27-34, 2003
  2. Fu FH, Harner CD, Klein AH: Shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin Orthop 1991; 269:162-73, 1991
  3. Neer CS: Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop 173:70-77, 1983
  4. Dayıcan A, Öztürk C, Portakal S ve ark: Subakromiyal sıkışma sendromunda cerrahi tedavi. Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi 13:73-7, 2002
  5. Beaton DE, Richards RR: Measuring function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surgery [Am] 78-A:882-90, 1996
  6. Constant CR, Murley AHG: A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160-64, 1987
  7. Leggin BG, Ianotti JP: Shoulder outcome measurement. Ianotti JP, Williams GR. Disorders of the Shoulder: Diagnosis and Management, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 1999, 1023-39
  8. Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Geert JMG van der Heijden, Andrea F de Winter, Bart W Koes, Walter Devillé et al. The responsiveness of the shoulder disability questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 57:82-7, 1998
  9. Ware JE: SF-36 Health survey update. Spine 25:3130-39, 2000
  10. Hays RD, Hahn H, Marshall G: Use of the SF-36 and other health-related quality of life measures to assess persons with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:4-9, 2002
  11. Kirkley A, Alvarez C, Griffin S: The development and evaluation of a disease-spesific quality of life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 13:84-92, 2003
  12. L’Insalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB, Altchek DW, Peterson MGE: A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surgery [Am] 79-A:738-48, 1997
  13. Matsen FA 3rd, Ziegler DW, DeBartolo SE: Patient self assessment of health status and function in glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J Shoulder and Elbow Surg 4:345-51, 1995
  14. Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M, Karahan M: Self assessment of general health status in patients with five common shoulder conditions. J Shoulder and Elbow Surg 7:228-37, 1998
  15. Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M: Early effectiveness of artroscopic repair for full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: an outcome analysis. J Bone Joint Surgery [Am] 80:33-40, 1998.