Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

2D Analysis of Gold Weight Implantation Surgery Results in Paralytic Lagophthalmos

Pages
200–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The PFH and LV were compatible with the OSA and LA, preoperatively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Gold weight implantation in the upper eyelid is a frequently performed treatment for paralytic lagophthalmos to prevent corneal exposure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A margin reflex distance of -1 and -2 (MRD1, MRD2), the palpebral fissure height (PFH), and the vertical lagophthalmos (LV) are 1-dimensional (1D) measurements used in follow-up.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The PFH and LV were compatible with the OSA and LA, preoperatively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Gold weight implantation in the upper eyelid is a frequently performed treatment for paralytic lagophthalmos to prevent corneal exposure. A margin reflex distance of -1 and -2 (MRD1, MRD2), the palpebral fissure height (PFH), and the vertical lagophthalmos (LV) are 1-dimensional (1D) measurements used in follow-up. Because the exposure area is 2-dimensional (2D), this study was designed to investigate the results using both 1D and 2D analysis. Methods: Ten patients who underwent pretarsal suborbicularis oculi gold weight implantation were included in the study. Photographs were taken with a digital camera and the images were analyzed using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The lagophthalmos area (LA) and ocular surface area (OSA) were measured in 2D in addition to the MRD1, MRD2, PFH, LV. Preoperative and postoperative values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Associations between parameters were evaluated using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results: The mean age of the patients (7 male, 3 female) was 39.6±16.4 years (range: 14–60 years). The mean implant weight was 1.46 g (0.8–1.6 g). There were significant reductions in the MRD1, MRD2, PFH, OSA, LV, and LA values after surgery (p<0.05). The weight of the gold implant had a strong correlation with the PFH, OSA, MRD1, and MRD2, but not the LV or LA, preoperatively. The OSA was strongly correlated with the MRD1, PFH, and the implant weight, but not the MRD2. The LA was strongly correlated with the LV, preoperatively. In the postoperative period, the OSA was strongly correlated with the PFH and the MRD2 but not the MRD1, while the LA was strongly correlated with the LV, MRD1, and the PFH. Conclusion: It is easy to obtain 2D measurements using digital image analysis software, and they proved to be accurate and correlated strongly with 1D measurements. The OSA and LA measurements were significantly lower following upper eyelid gold weight implantation. The PFH and LV were compatible with the OSA and LA, preoperatively.

🔖

Cite This Article

CABUK, K., KARABULUT, G., FAZIL, K., NACAROĞLU, Ş. A., GÜNAYDIN, Z., TAŞKAPILI, M. (2021). 2D Analysis of Gold Weight Implantation Surgery Results in Paralytic Lagophthalmos. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 200–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/389418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Vásquez LM, Medel R. Lagophthalmos after facial palsy: current therapeutic options. Ophthalmic Res 2014;52:165–9
  2. Mancini R, Taban M, Lowinger A, Pariseau B, Leyngold AR, Anderson RL. Use of hyaluronic acid gel in the management of paralytic lagophthalmos: the hyaluronic acid gel ‘gold weight’. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:23–6
  3. Rofagha S, Seiff SR. Long-term results for the use of gold eyelid load weights in the management of facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:142–9
  4. Hassan AS, Frueh BR, Elner VM. Müllerectomy for upper eyelid retraction and lagophthalmos due to facial nerve palsy. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1221–5
  5. Guillou-Jamard MR, Labbé D, Bardot J, Benateau H. Paul Tessier's technique in the treatment of paralytic lagophthalmos by lengthening of the levator muscle: evaluation of 29 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2011;67:S31–5
  6. Egemen O, Ozkaya O, Uscetin I, Akan M. Covering the gold weight with fascia lata graft in paralytic lagophthalmos patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:369–72
  7. Silver AL, Lindsay RW, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA. Thin-profile platinum eyelid weighting: a superior option in the paralyzed eye. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1697–703
  8. Ben Simon GJ, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Subperiosteal midface lift with or without a hard palate mucosal graft for correction of lower eyelid retraction. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1869–73
  9. Patel MP, Shapiro MD, Spinelli HM. Combined hard palate spacer graft, midface suspension, and lateral canthoplasty for lower eyelid retraction: a tripartite approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:2105–14; discussion 2115–7
  10. Rozen S, Lehrman C. Upper eyelid postseptal weight placement for treatment of paralytic lagophthalmos. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:1253–65
  11. Gilbard SM, Daspit CP. Reanimation of the paretic eyelid using gold weight implantation. A new approach and prospective evaluation. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;7:93–103
  12. Pausch NC, Kuhnt CP, Halama D. Upper-eyelid weight implants for patients with lagophthalmos-comparison of rigid and flexible implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:1843–9
  13. Baheerathan N, Ethunandan M, Ilankovan V. Gold weight implants in the management of paralytic lagophthalmos. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:632–6
  14. Rolando M, Refojo MF. Tear evaporimeter for measuring water evaporation rate from the tear film under controlled conditions in humans. Exp Eye Res 1983;36:25–33
  15. Sotoyama M, Jonai H, Saito S,