SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Some Rootstocks on Growth of ‘Vanda’ Sweet Cherry Cultivar Nursery

‘Vanda’ Kiraz Çeşidinin Fidan Gelişimi Üzerine Bazı Anaçların Etkisi

Mehmet Fikret BALTA
Cenk ÇELİKBAŞ
Orhan KARAKAYA
Hüseyın KIRKAYA
Slawomir ŚWİERCZYŃSKİ
Magdalena URBANİAK
Pages
169–178
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it has been determined that ‘Vanda’ cultivar showed more vigor growth on Cold rootstock when compared to Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was carried out to determine effect of PHL-A, Gisela 5 and Colt rootstocks on nursery growth in ‘Vanda’ sweet cherry cultivar.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect of rootstocks on growth of Vanda trees in nursery was found to be significant (p<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it has been determined that ‘Vanda’ cultivar showed more vigor growth on Cold rootstock when compared to Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kiraz · fidan boyu · sürgün uzunluğu

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine effect of PHL-A, Gisela 5 and Colt rootstocks on nursery growth in ‘Vanda’ sweet cherry cultivar. The effect of rootstocks on growth of Vanda trees in nursery was found to be significant (p<0.05). Generally, the effect of Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks on nursery growth of ‘Vanda’ cultivar was similar. Depending on rootstocks, nursery height, scion trunk diameter, number of lateral shoots, shoot length, fresh mass of nursery, fresh weight of leaves, dry weight and leaf area was ranked from 125.7 (Gisela 5) to 198.8 cm (Colt), 12.8 (Gisela 5) to 22.4 mm (Colt), 1.1 (PHL-A) to 9.9 (Colt), 21.53 (Gisela 5) to 42.63 cm (Colt), 0.5 (Gisela 5) to 1.95 kg (Colt), 145.0 (PHL-A) to 323.0 g (Colt), 56.2 (PHL-A) to 117.5 g (Colt) and 109 (Gisela 5) to 149.7 cm2 (Colt), respectively. Consequently, it has been determined that ‘Vanda’ cultivar showed more vigor growth on Cold rootstock when compared to Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks.

Özet

Bu araştırma ‘Vanda’ kiraz çeşidinin fidan gelişimi üzerine PHL-A, Gisela 5 ve Colt anaçlarının etkisini belirlenmek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Anaçların ‘Vanda’ kiraz çeşidinde fidan gelişimi üzerine etkisi önemli bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Genel olarak, ‘Vanda’ çeşidinin fidan gelişim üzerine Gisela 5 ve PHL-A anaçlarının etkisi benzer olmuştur. Anaçlara bağlı olarak, fidan boyu 125.7 (Gisela 5)-198.8 cm (Colt), kalem gövde çapı 12.8 (Gisela 5)-22.4 mm (Colt), yan dal sayısı 1.1 (PHL-A)-9.9 (Colt), sürgün uzunluğu 21.53 (Gisela 5)-42.63 cm (Colt), fidan yaş ağırlığı 0.5 (Gisela 5)-1.95 kg (Colt), yaprak yaş ağırlığı 145.0 (PHL-A)-323.0 g (Colt), yaprak kuru ağırlığı 56.2 (PHL-A)-117.5 g (Colt) ve yaprak alanı 109 (Gisela 5)-149.7 cm2 (Colt) arasında belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, ‘Vanda’ çeşidinde fidan gelişim performansı bakımından Colt anacının daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında, Colt anacına göre, Gisela 5 ve PHL-A anaçları üzerine aşılı fidanlar daha zayıf ve bodur bir gelişim göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALTA, M. F., ÇELİKBAŞ, C., KARAKAYA, O., KIRKAYA, H., ŚWİERCZYŃSKİ, S., URBANİAK, M. (2021). The Effect of Some Rootstocks on Growth of ‘Vanda’ Sweet Cherry Cultivar Nursery. Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 169–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/386865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ağlar, E. ve Yıldız, K. (2014). Influence of rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64) on performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 10, 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2014.10.09
  2. Aglar, E., Yildiz, K. ve Long, L. E. (2016). The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Early Performance of'0900 Ziraat'Sweet Cherry. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 44(2), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha44210401
  3. Aydın, E. ve Yarılgaç, T. (2020). Anaç adayı kiraz ve vişne genotiplerinin doku kültürü yöntemiyle çoğaltılması. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 9(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.732181
  4. Baryla, P., Kaplan, M. ve Krawiec, M. (2014). The effect of different types of rootstock on the quality of maiden trees of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cv.‘Regina’. Acta Agrobotanica, 67(4). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2014.051
  5. Baryla, P., Kaplan, M., Krawiec, M. ve Kiczorowski, P. (2013). The effect of rootstocks on the efficiency of a nursery of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) trees cv. ‘Regina’. Acta Agrobotanica, 66(4). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.058
  6. Bolsu, A., ve Akça, Y. (2011). Mahlep anacı üzerine aşılı 5 kiraz çeşidinin bazı morfolojik özellikleri ile meyve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(3), 152-157. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/204762 Cantín, C. M., Pinochet, J., Gogorcena, Y. ve Moreno, M. Á. (2010). Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 123(3), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.016
  7. Fajt, N., Folini, L., Bassi, G. ve Siegler, H. (2014). Lapins on ten cherry rootstocks in the Alpe Adria region. Acta Horticulturae, 1020, 371-376. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1020.51 Gómez-del-Campo, M., Ruiz, C. ve Lissarrague, J. R. (2002). Effect of water stress on leaf area development, photosynthesis, and productivity in Chardonnay and Airén grapevines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 53(2), 138-143. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290286691
  8. Karakaya, O., Ozturk, B., Aglar, E. ve Balik, H. I. (2021). The influence of the rootstocks on biochemical and bioactive compound content of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry fruit. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 63(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00542-0
  9. Küçükyumuk, C., Sarısu, H., Yıldız, H., Kaçal, E. ve Koçal, H. (