Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2018 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

A modified cutaneous ureterostomy provides satisfactory short and midterm outcomes in select cases

Pages
399–405
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

None of the patients had any problem related to ureterostomy bag application.Conclusion: Modified lateral cutaneous ureterostomy provides relatively straighter and shorter retroperitoneal course of ureter with acceptable morbidity and avoids use of bowel in selected patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We present the outcomes of modification of cutaneous ureterostomy by extreme lateralization ofthe stoma and use of skin flap for formation of ureterostomy.Material and methods: Between June 2012 and June 2016, 36 patients had modified cutaneous ureterostomy for ureteral obstruction due to pelvic malignancy or genitourinary tuberculosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Double J stents wereused in all patients for 6 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:None of the patients had any problem related to ureterostomy bag application.Conclusion: Modified lateral cutaneous ureterostomy provides relatively straighter and shorter retroperitoneal course of ureter with acceptable morbidity and avoids use of bowel in selected patients.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: We present the outcomes of modification of cutaneous ureterostomy by extreme lateralization ofthe stoma and use of skin flap for formation of ureterostomy.Material and methods: Between June 2012 and June 2016, 36 patients had modified cutaneous ureterostomy for ureteral obstruction due to pelvic malignancy or genitourinary tuberculosis. Transureteroureterostomy was made with cutaneous stoma at anterior axillary line between iliac crest and lower rib cage, insteadof spinoumbilical line. To prevent stenosis a ʻV’ shaped skin was fed into the stoma. Double J stents wereused in all patients for 6 weeks. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated. All patients werefollowed up at 3 month intervals.Results: Of 36 patients, 22 had radical cystoprostatectomy (including nephroureterectomy in 2 patients) and7 had palliative cystectomy. Others had locally advanced prostate cancer (n=1), locally advanced cervicalcancer (n=3), ovarian cancer (n=1) and genitourinary tuberculosis with small capacity bladder along witha large vesicovaginal fistula (n=1). One patient developed ureteral necrosis requiring conversion to ilealconduit. Three patients developed stomal stenosis: two were managed by self-dilatation while one requiredrevision of stoma. Thirteen patients died of the disease at a median follow up of 6 months with functioningstoma. Remaining 19 patients survived without any complications at a median follow-up of 20.5 months(5.5-43.5 months). None of the patients had any problem related to ureterostomy bag application.Conclusion: Modified lateral cutaneous ureterostomy provides relatively straighter and shorter retroperitoneal course of ureter with acceptable morbidity and avoids use of bowel in selected patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

YADAV, P., MITTAL, V., GAUR, P., SRIVASTAVA, D., SUREKA, S. K., MANDHANI, A. (2018). A modified cutaneous ureterostomy provides satisfactory short and midterm outcomes in select cases. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 399–405. https://ajindex.com/articles/379884

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Roth A. Transabdominal transperitoneal bilateral omentoureterostomy (Exhibit and motion picture). Annual Meeting of the North Central Section, AUA, Cleveland, Ohio, September 27–30, 1967.
  2. Chitale SV, Chitale VR. Bilateral ureterocutaneostomy with modified stoma: long-term follow-up. World J Urol 2006;24:220-3. [CrossRef] Burkhard FC, Wuethrich PY. Cutaneous ureterostomy: 'back to the future'. BJU Int 2016;118:493-4. [CrossRef] Leonardo S, Martin J, Woodruff MW. Ileo-Ureteral Nipple, A Modified Cutaneous Ureterostomy. Arch Surg 1965;90:332-6. [CrossRef] Nogueira L, Reis RB, Machado RD, Tobias-Machado M, Carvalhal G, Freitas C Jr, et al. Cutaneous ureterostomy with definitive ureteral stent as urinary diversion option in unfit patients after radical cystectomy. Acta Cir Bras 2013; 28(Suppl 1):43-7. Rodríguez AR, Lockhart A, King J, Wiegand L, Carrion R, Ordorica R, et al. Cutaneous Ureterostomy Technique for Adults and Effects of Ureteral Stenting: An Alternative to the Ileal Conduit. J Urol 2011;186:1939-43. [CrossRef] Longo N, Imbimbo C, Fusco F, Ficarra V, Mangiapia F, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Complications and quality of life in elderly patients with several comorbidities undergoing cutaneous ureterostomy with single stoma or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2016;118:521-6. [CrossRef] Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205‑13. Mac Gregor PS, Kay R, Straffon RA. Cutaneous ureterostomy in children-long-term follow-up. J Urol 1985;134:518-20. [CrossRef] Kogan BA, Gohary MA. Cutaneous ureterostomy as a permanent external urinary diversion in children. J Urol 1984;132:729-31. [CrossRef] Sadlowski RW, Belman AB, Filmer RB, Smey P, King LR. Followup of cutaneous ureterostomy in children. J Urol 1978;119:116-9. [CrossRef] Deliveliotis C, Papatsoris A, Chrisofos M, Dellis A, Liakouras C, Skolarikos A. Urinary diversion in high-risk elderly patients: modified cutaneous ureterostomy or ileal conduit? Urology 2005;66:299-304.
  3. Pycha A, Comploj E, Martini T, Trenti E, Mian C, Lusuardi L, et al. Comparison of complications in three incontinent urinary diversions. Eur Urol 2008;54:825-32. [CrossRef] MacGregor PS, Montie JE, Straffon RA. Cutaneous ureterostomy as palliative diversion in adults with malignancy. Urology 1987;30:31-4. [CrossRef] Hautmann RE, Abol-enein H, Hafez K, Haro I, Mansson W, Mills RD, et al. Urin