Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6

Role of early povidone iodine instillation in post-renal transplant lymphorrhea: A prospective randomized study

Pages
461–466
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 9 (14.75%) patients in group A and 29 (51.78%) patients in group B had lymphatic collections (both symptomatic and asymptomatic).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the role of early povidone iodine instillation in the management of post-renal transplant lymphorrhea.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: Live-related renal transplant recipients operated between January 2002 and December 2015 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 9 (14.75%) patients in group A and 29 (51.78%) patients in group B had lymphatic collections (both symptomatic and asymptomatic).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the role of early povidone iodine instillation in the management of post-renal transplant lymphorrhea. Material and methods: Live-related renal transplant recipients operated between January 2002 and December 2015 were included in the study. Significant lymphorrhea was defined as >50 mL lymph from drain beyond postoperative day 5. Such patients were randomized into two groups by simple randomiza - tion using a computer-generated random list: group A (received 0.5% povidone iodine instillation) and group B (no instillation). Absolute risk reduction and numbers needed to treat were calculated to estimate the effect of povidone iodine instillation for the treatment of lymphorrhea and decrease in the incidence of lymphocoele. Results: A total of 1766 patients underwent renal transplant during this period. One hundred seventeen patients with lymphorrhea through the drain underwent randomization into group A (n=61) and group B (n=56). In group A, 58 patients had successful resolution within 2 weeks, whereas in group B, 34 patients had successful resolution within 2 weeks. Overall, 9 (14.75%) patients in group A and 29 (51.78%) patients in group B had lymphatic collections (both symptomatic and asymptomatic). Symptomatic lymphocoele was present in 1 patient in group A and 7 patients in group B on follow-up. Absolute risk reduction was 10.8%, and for every symptomatic lymphocoele prevented, 10 patients needed povidone iodine instilla - tion. Conclusion: Povidone iodine instillation after 5 days of transplantation aids in the early resolution of post-renal transplantation lymphorrhea, as well as reduces the incidence of future lymphocoele.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yadav, P., Lal, H., Sureka, S. K., Kapoor, R., Srivastava, A., Singh, U. P., Ansari, M. S. (2022). Role of early povidone iodine instillation in post-renal transplant lymphorrhea: A prospective randomized study. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6, 461–466. https://ajindex.com/articles/614369

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Zargar-shoshtari MA, Soleimani M, Salimi H, Mehravaran K. Symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation: a single- center experience. Urol J 2008;5:34-6
  2. Lima ML, Cotrim CA, Moro JC, Miyaoka R, D'ancona CA. Lapa- roscopic treatment of lymphoceles after renal transplantation. Int Braz J Urol 2012;38:215-21. [CrossRef] 3. Ranghino A, Segoloni GP, Lasaponara F, Biancone L. Lymphatic disorders after renal transplantation: new insights for an old com- plication. Clin Kidney J 2015;8:615-22. [CrossRef] 4. Lucewicz A, Wong G, Lam VW, Hawthorne WJ, Allen R, Craig JC, et al. Management of primary symptomatic lymphocele af- ter kidney transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation 2011;92:663-73. [CrossRef] 5. Allen RD. Vascular and Lymphatic Complications after Kidney Transplantation. In P. J. Morris & S. J. Knechtle (Eds.), Kidney Transplantation: Principles and Practice 2014; (7th ed., p. 460
  3. Zietek Z, Sulikowski T, Tejchman K, Sieńko J, Janeczek M, Iwan- Zietek I, et al. Lymphocele after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:2744-7. [CrossRef] 7. Kim MJ, Kim CS, Choi JS, Bae EH, Ma SK, Kim SW. Perire- nal fluid collection after kidney transplantation. Chonnam Med J 2012;48:57-9. [CrossRef] 8. Bzoma B, Kostro J, Dębska-Ślizień A, Hellmann AR, Zadrożny D, Śledziński Z, et al. Treatment of the Lymphocele After Kid- ney Transplantation: A Single-center Experience. Transplant Proc 2016;48:1637-40. [CrossRef] 9. Kiberd B, Panek R, Clase CM, MacDonald AS, McAlister V, Be- litsky P, et al. The morbidity of prolonged wound drainage after kidney transplantation. J Urol 1999;161:1467-9. [CrossRef] 10. Lippi G, Favaloro EJ, Cervellin G. Hemostatic properties of the lymph: relationships with occlusion and thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012;38:213-21. [CrossRef] 11. Humphreys MR, Castle EP, Andrews PE, Gettman MT, Ereth MH. Microporous polysaccharide hemospheres for manage- ment of laparoscopic trocar injury to the spleen. Am J Surg 2008;195:99-103. [CrossRef] 12. Oertli D, Laffer U, Haberthuer F, Kreuter U, Harder F. Perioperative and postoperative tranexamic acid reduces the local wound complication rate after surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg 1994;81:856-9.[CrossRef] 13. Teruel JL, Escobar EM, Quereda C, Mayayo T, Ortuño J. A simple and safe method for management of lymphocele after renal trans- plantation. J Urol 1983;130:1058-9. [CrossRef] 14. Zuckerman DA, Yeager TD. Percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy of post- operative lymphoceles