Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Permanent perineal urethrostomy for anterior urethral strictures: A critical appraisal of long-term outcomes and erectile function

Pages
158–163
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A majority of patients also maintain a satisfactory erectile function.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In complex strictures, especially in elderly patients, perineal urethrostomy (PU) provide excellent voiding function.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 146 patients who underwent permanent PU at our institution from January 2000 to December 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A majority of patients also maintain a satisfactory erectile function.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: In complex strictures, especially in elderly patients, perineal urethrostomy (PU) provide excellent voiding function. This study aimed at evaluating the long-term voiding and erectile function of PU as a permanent procedure for such strictures. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 146 patients who underwent permanent PU at our institution from January 2000 to December 2018. All patients had complex urethral strictures. Patients with posterior urethral involvement were excluded. Patients were followed up at 3 months and then yearly. Failure was defined as the need for any additional procedures. They were also evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. Fisher’s exact test and χ2 test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The median age at the time of surgery was 58±7.3 years. The mean stricture length was 6.5±2.1 cm. All the patients had a history of previous surgery, and the average number of procedures per patient was 2.4. The median follow-up period was 26 months. The most common early and late postoperative complications were bleeding and stenosis of the urethrostomy, respectively. A total of 129 (88.3%) patients had a successful surgery. The number of patients with no erectile dysfunction increased from 55.4% to 67.8% after PU. The mean IIEF-5 score improved from 20.07 to 21.31 after PU, but this did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.3558). Conclusion: Permanent PU is an acceptable option for complex long-segment anterior urethral strictures, especially in elderly patients, with an excellent long-term outcome. A majority of patients also maintain a satisfactory erectile function.

🔖

Cite This Article

YADAV, P., DANİSH, N., SUREKA, S. S., RUSTAGİ, S., KAPOOR, R., SRİVASTAVA, A., SİNGH, U. P. (2021). Permanent perineal urethrostomy for anterior urethral strictures: A critical appraisal of long-term outcomes and erectile function. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 158–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/402992

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Santucci R, Eisenberg L. Urethrotomy has a much lower success rate than previously reported. J Urol 2010
  2. [Crossref] 2. Lumen N, Beysens M, Van Praet C, Decaestecker K, Spinoit AF, Hoebeke P, et al. Perineal urethrostomy: Surgical and functional evaluation of two techniques. Biomed Res Int 2015
  3. 365715. [Crossref] 3. Russell RH. The treatment of urethral stricture by excision. Br J Surg 1914
  4. [Crossref] 4. Johanson B. Reconstruction of the male urethra and strictures. Acta Chir Scand 1953
  5. Blandy JP, Singh M, Tresidder GC. Urethroplasty by scrotal flap for long urethral strictures. Br J Urol 1968
  6. [Crossref] 6. Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al. Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline. J Urol 2017
  7. [Crossref] 7. Breyer BN, Mcaninch JW, Whitson JM, Eisenberg ML, Mehdizadeh JF, Myers JB, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for longterm urethroplasty outcome. J Urol 2010
  8. [Crossref] 8. Warner JN, Malkawi I, Dhradkeh M, Joshi PM, Kulkarni SB, Lazzeri M, et al. A Multi-institutional Evaluation of the Management and Outcomes of Long-segment Urethral Strictures. Urology 2015
  9. [Crossref] 9. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999
  10. [Crossref] 10. Barbagli G, Mirri F, Gallucci M, Sansalone S, Romano G, Lazzeri M. Histological evidence of urethral involvement in male patients with genital lichen sclerosus: a preliminary report. J Urol 2011
  11. [Crossref] 11. Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol 1998
  12. [Crossref] 12. Kamat N. Perineal urethrostomy stenosis repair with buccal mucosa: description of technique and report of four cases. Urology 2008
  13. [Crossref] 13. Depasquale I, Park AJ, Bracka A. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int 2000
  14. [Crossref] 14. Lopez JC, Gomez EG, Carrillo AA, Castineira RC, Tapia MJ. Perineostomy: the last oportunity. Int Braz J Urol 2015
  15. [Crossref] 15. Barbagli G, De angelis M, Romano G, Lazzeri M. Clinical outcome and quality of life assessment in patients treated with perineal urethrostomy for anterior urethral stricture disease. J Urol 2009
  16. [Crossref] 16. Kulkarni