SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2017 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Farklı kriterlere göre gestasyonel diyabet prevalansı

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus according to the different criterias

Evren AKGÖL
SEDAT ABUŞOĞLU
Faik Deniz GÜN
ALİ ÜNLÜ
Pages
18–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a significant increase in GDM prevalence using the IADPSG criteria

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The two-step approach recommended by the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG), Carpenter and Coustan (C&C), and O’Sullivan, and the single-step approach recommended by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) are used to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to determine GDM prevalence and to compare the two-step and single-step approaches used in the southeastern region of Turkey.Materials and Methods: In total, 3048 records of pregnant women screened for GDM between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively extracted from our laboratory information system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a significant increase in GDM prevalence using the IADPSG criteria
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The two-step approach recommended by the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG), Carpenter and Coustan (C&C), and O’Sullivan, and the single-step approach recommended by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) are used to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to determine GDM prevalence and to compare the two-step and single-step approaches used in the southeastern region of Turkey.Materials and Methods: In total, 3048 records of pregnant women screened for GDM between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively extracted from our laboratory information system. GDM was defined according to the criteria of NDDG, C&C, and O’Sullivan between in 2008 and 2011, and according to those of the IADPSG between 2012 and 2014. Demographic variables were compared using student’s t-test. The linear trends in GDM prevalence with age were calculated using logistic regression.Results: GDM prevalence was found as 4.8%, 8%, and 13.4% using the NDDG, C&C, and O’Sullivan two-step approach, respectively, and 22.3% with the IADPSG single-step approach. GDM prevalence increased with increasing age in both approaches.Conclusion: GDM prevalence was higher using the single-step approach than with the two-step approach. There was a significant increase in GDM prevalence using the IADPSG criteria

Özet

Amaç: Gestasyonel diabetes mellitus (GDM) tanısı için Ulusal Diyabet Veri Grubu (NDDG), Carpenter ve Coustan (C&C), O'Sullivan tarafından iki basamaklı yaklaşımlar önerirken, Uluslararası Diyabet ve Gebelik Çalışma Grupları Birliği (IADPSG) tek basamaklı yaklaşımı önermektedir. Çalışmamızın amacı Güneydoğu bölgesinde iki basamaklı yaklaşımlar ile tek basamaklı yaklaşımları karşılaştırarak GDM prevalansını belirlemektir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2008 ile 2014 yılları arasındaki 3048 gebe kadının kayıtları laboratuvar bilgi sisteminden alındı. GDM tanısı 2008-2011 yılları arasında NDDG, C&C ve O'Sullivan kriterlerine göre, 2012-2014 yılları arasında IADPSG kriterlerine göre belirlendi. Demografik veriler student's t-testi kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı. Gestasyonel diyabet prevalansının yaşla ilişkisini saptamak için lojistik regresyon testi yapıldı.Bulgular: Gestasyonel diyabet prevalansı NDDG, C&C ve O'Sullivan kriterlerine göre sırasıyla %4,8, %8 ve %13,4 olarak; IADPSG kriterine göre %22,3 olarak bulundu. GDM prevalansının tüm kriterlerde yaşla arttığı saptandı.Sonuç: GDM prevalansı tek basamaklı yaklaşım kullanıldığında iki basamaklı yaklaşımlara göre daha yüksektir. IADPSG kriterleri kullanıldığında GDM prevalansında anlamlı yükselme olmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÖL, E., ABUŞOĞLU, S., GÜN, F. D., ÜNLÜ, A. (2017). Farklı kriterlere göre gestasyonel diyabet prevalansı. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 18–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/376301

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1183-97
  2. Galarneau F, Inzucchi SE. Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004;31:907-33
  3. O’Sullivan JB, Mahan C. Criteria for oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes 1964;13:278-85
  4. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 1979;28:1039-57
  5. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768-73
  6. Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991-2002
  7. Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, et al. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676-82
  8. American Diabetes Association. Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes 2011. Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl 1):S4- 10
  9. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. 2013
  10. Committee on Obstetric Practice, Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:751-3
  11. Ricart W, Lopez J, Mozas J, Pericot A, Sancho MA, Gonzalez N, et al. Potential impact of American Diabetes Association (2000) criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Spain. Diabetologia 2005;48:1135-41
  12. Duran A, Saenz S, Torrejon MJ, Bordiu E, Del Valle L, Galindo M, et al. Introduction of IADPSG Criteria for the Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Results in Improved Pregnancy Outcomes at a Lower Cost in a Large Cohort of Pregnant Women: The St. Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2442-50
  13. Ogunleye O, Davidson K, Gregg A, Egerman R. Two-Step Glucose Tolerance Test Compared With One-Step Glucose Tolerance Test. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:163S-45
  14. Yumei W, Huixia Y, Weiwei Z, Hongyun Y, Haixia L, Jie Y, et al. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria is suitable for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis: further evidence from China. Chin Med J (En