Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2016 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Prevention of Withdrawal Movement Associated with the Injection of Rocuronium in Children: Comparison of Paracetamol and Lidocaine

Çocuklarda Roküronyum Enjeksiyonuna Bağlı Çekme Hareketinin Önlenmesinde Parasetamol ve Lidokainin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
86–90
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Using a venous occlusion technique, pretreatment with 50 mg paracetamol can prevent withdrawal movement caused by rocuronium injection in children but is not as effective as lidocaine to prevent moderate withdrawal movement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Pain from rocuronium injection is observed in 50%-80 % of patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of pretreatment with paracetamol and lidocaine in preventing pain-induced withdrawal caused by the intravenous injection of rocuronium during the induction of general anaesthesia in paediatric patients.Methods: Ninety children were randomized into two groups using a simple drawing from the box method: a paracetamol group (Group P, n=45) and a lidocaine group (Group L, n=45).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Using a venous occlusion technique, pretreatment with 50 mg paracetamol can prevent withdrawal movement caused by rocuronium injection in children but is not as effective as lidocaine to prevent moderate withdrawal movement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Pain from rocuronium injection is observed in 50%-80 % of patients. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of pretreatment with paracetamol and lidocaine in preventing pain-induced withdrawal caused by the intravenous injection of rocuronium during the induction of general anaesthesia in paediatric patients.Methods: Ninety children were randomized into two groups using a simple drawing from the box method: a paracetamol group (Group P, n=45) and a lidocaine group (Group L, n=45). After anaesthesia induction, venous occlusion was applied by a paediatric cuff inflated to a pressure of 75 mmHg and by 50 mg paracetamol and 0.5 mg kg-1 lidocaine was injected in Groups P and L, respectively. Venous occlusion was then released, followed by rocuronium injection (0.6 mg kg-1). Withdrawal was evaluated using a 4-point scale (1, no response; 2, movement at the wrist only; 3, movement/withdrawal involving arm only (elbow/shoulder) and 4, generalized response, movement/withdrawal in more than one extremity).Results: The incidence of withdrawal movement was 42% and 26% in the Groups P and L, respectively (p=0.120). Although no significant differences were noted in the number of patients who had no withdrawal movement and mild withdrawal movement in Groups P and L, compared with Group L, the incidences of moderate withdrawal movement were significantly higher in Group P (p< 0.05). No patient in either group revealed generalized movement. Conclusion: Using a venous occlusion technique, pretreatment with 50 mg paracetamol can prevent withdrawal movement caused by rocuronium injection in children but is not as effective as lidocaine to prevent moderate withdrawal movement.

Özet

Amaç: İntravenöz (i.v) roküronyum enjeksiyonu sonrası hastaların %50-80'i gibi büyük bir kısmında ağrı görülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, genel anestezi altında ameliyat geçirecek çocuk hastalarda, i.v. roküronyum enjeksiyonuna bağlı çekme hareketini önlemede, önceden uygulanan i.v. parasetamolün etkinliğini i.v. lidokain ile karşı- laştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Genel anestezi uygulanacak olan 90 hasta basit kura çekme yöntemi ile rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı; parasetamol grubu (Grup P, n=45) ve lidokain grubu (Grup L, n=45). Anestezi indüksiyonunun ardından tansiyon manşonu 75 mm Hg'ya kadar şişirilerek ven oklüzyonu uygulandı ve Grup P'de i.v. 50 mg parasetamol, Grup L'de i.v. 0,5 mg kg-1 lidokain uygulandı. Ven oklüzyonu 60 saniye (sn) sonra açıldı 0,6 mg kg-1 roküronyum 5 sn'de enjekte edildi. Hastalarda gözlenen hareketler, 4 puanlık bir skala [0: hareket yok, 1: sadece bilekte hareket var, 2: sadece kolda hareket var (dirsek/omuz), 3: bir ekstremiteden daha yaygın hareket] ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Kol çekme hareketinin sıklığı parasetamol ve lidokain gruplarında sırasıyla %42 ve %26 olarak tespit edildi (p=0,120). Çekme hareketi görülmeyen ve hafif çekme hareketi görülen hasta sayıları bakımından gruplar arasında fark yokken, orta şiddette çekme hareketi görülen hasta sayısı Grup L ile karşılaştırıldığında, Grup P'de anlamlı olarak fazlaydı (p< 0,05). Her iki grupta da hastaların hiçbirinde yaygın hareket görülmedi. Sonuç: Ven oklüzyonu tekniği kullanılarak uygulanan 50 mg parasetamol, roküronyum enjeksiyon ağrısına bağlı çekme hareketini çocuk hastaların %58'inde engeller, ancak orta şiddette çekme hareketini önlemede lidokain kadar etkili değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, R., AKIN, M., KESKİN, G., ÜNAL, D., DÖNMEZ, A. (2016). Prevention of Withdrawal Movement Associated with the Injection of Rocuronium in Children: Comparison of Paracetamol and Lidocaine. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 86–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/370286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Reddy MS, Chen FG, Ng HP. Effect of ondansetron pretreatment on pain after rocuronium and propofol injection:a randomised, double-blind controlled comparison with lidocaine. Anaesthesia 2001
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Memis D, Turan A, Karamanlioglu B, Sut N, Pamukçu Z. The prevention of pain from injection of rocuronium by ondansetron, lidocaine, tramadol and fentanyl. Anesth Analg 2002
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Abu-Halaweh SA, Aloweidi AK, Qudaisat IY, Al-Hussami MO, Al Zaben KR, Abu-Halaweh AS. Pretreatment with remifentanil, fentanyl, or lidocaine to prevent withdrawal after rocuronium using venous occlusion technique in children and adolescents: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. J Anesth 2014
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Jung KT, Kim HJ, Bae HS, Lee HY, Kim SH, So KY, et al. Effects of lidocaine, ketamine, and remifentanil on withdrawal response of rocuronium. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014
  5. 80 [CrossRef] 5. Tuncali B, Karci A, Tuncali BE, Mavioglu O, Olguner CG, Ayhan S, et al. Dilution of rocuronium to 0. 5 mg/mL with 0. 9% NaCl eliminates the pain during intravenous injection in awake patients. Anesth Analg 2004
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Mahajan C, Rath GP, Bithal PK, Prabhakar H, Yadav R, Dube SK. Local warming at injection site helps alleviate pain after rocuronium administration. J Anesth 2010
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Flower RJ, Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase in brain explains the anti-pyretic activity of paracetamol (4-acetamidophenol). Nature 1972
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Abbott FV, Hellemans KG. Phenacetin, acetaminophen and dipyrone: analgesic and rewarding effects. Behav Brain Res 2000
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Hinz B, Cheremina O, Brune K. Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor in man. FASEB J 2008
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Lee YS, Kim H, Brahim JS, Rowan J, Lee G, Dionne RA. Acetaminophen selectively suppresses peripheral prostaglandin E2 release and increases COX-2 gene expression in a clinical model of acute inflammation. Pain 2007
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Simmons DL, Botting RM, Robertson PM, Madsen ML, Vane JR. Induction of an acetaminophen-sensitive cyclooxygenase with reduced sensitivity to nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Canbay O, Celebi N, Arun O, Karagoz AH, Saricaoğlu F, Ozgen S. Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen and lidocaine on propofol injection pain. Br J Anaesth 2008