SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turizm Akademik Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A Dual-Dialectical Approach to Presenteeism and Absenteeism Among Kitchen Employees

Kudret GÜLA
Melike GÜLB
Pages
15–23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research findings indicate that positive job satisfaction, work-related factors, organizational culture, work attendance and personal factors have positive and significant effect on presenteeism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Irregularity of working hours in the tourism industry and forcing employees to work more than legal regulations that raises the problem of presenteeism in accommodation establishments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research findings indicate that positive job satisfaction, work-related factors, organizational culture, work attendance and personal factors have positive and significant effect on presenteeism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But the effect of personal factors on work attendance is not statistically significant.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hotel · Kitchen Employee · Presenteeism

Özet

Irregularity of working hours in the tourism industry and forcing employees to work more than legal regulations that raises the problem of presenteeism in accommodation establishments. Factors that promote presenteeism and absenteeism in the hospitality businesses differ across workplaces and occupational groups. On the other hand, going to work despite the health problems of kitchen employees threat customer’s health and led to the emergence of new health problems. The aim of the study is determine the factors that force the kitchen workers to presenteeism and absenteeism. Questionnaire techniques were used in the data collection. Data were analyzed by frequency and variance tests. Research findings indicate that positive job satisfaction, work-related factors, organizational culture, work attendance and personal factors have positive and significant effect on presenteeism. Positive personal factors, work related factors and organizational culture have positive and significant effect on job satisfaction. Positive work related factors and organizational culture have also positive effect on work attendance. But the effect of personal factors on work attendance is not statistically significant.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLA, K., GÜLB, M. (2016). A Dual-Dialectical Approach to Presenteeism and Absenteeism Among Kitchen Employees. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 15–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/368707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Baran, M., Kanten, P., Kanten, S. & Yaşlıoğlu, M. (2009). An Empirical Research on the Relationship Between Job Insecurity and Employee Health &Safety. Ege Academic Review, 9 (3), 969-976.
  2. Bhui, K.S., Dinos, S., Stansfeld, S. A. & White, P. D. (2012). A Synthesis of the Evidence for Managing Stress at Work: A Review of the Reviews Reporting on Anxiety, Depression, and Absenteeism. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Volume 2012, 1-21.
  3. Bierlaa, I., Huverb, B. & Richard, S. (2013). New evidence on absenteeism and presenteeism. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (7), 1536–1550.
  4. Böckerman, P. & Laukkanen, E. (2009). Presenteeism in Finland: Determinants by gender and the sector of economy, Ege Academic Review, 9 (3), 1007-1016.
  5. Burgher, K. E. & Snyder, M. B. (2014). Volunteering. Sunshine Valley Communications and bookboon.com, ISBN:978-87-403-0709-2.
  6. Celik, D. A. & Oz, E. U. (2011). The effects of emotional dissonance and quality of work life perceptions on absenteeism and turnover intentions among Turkish call center employees. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2515 –2519. Cetin, M. (2016). An Exploratory Study of Presenteeism in Turkish Context. Emerging Markets Journal, 6(1), 25-38.
  7. Ciftci, B.(2010). Iste Var Ol(Ama)Ma Sorunu ve İşletmelerin Uygulayabileceği Çözüm Önerileri. Calisma ve Toplum, 1, 153-174.
  8. Collins, A. & Cartwright, S. (2012). Why come into work ill? Individual and organizational factors underlying presenteeism. Employee Relations, 34 (4), 429-442.
  9. Deery, S., Walsh, J. & Zatzick, C.D. ( 2014). A moderated mediation analysis of job demands, presenteeism, and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 352-369.
  10. Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hox, J. (2009). Present but sick: A three-wave study of job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Development International, 14, 50–68.
  11. Demir, M. (2011). Relationships between Employees’ Perceptions of Quality of Work Life, Intent to Remain with the Organization and Employee Absenteeism. Ege Academic Review, 11(3), 453-464.
  12. Erkut, H. (1992). Verimlilik ve Motivasyon. Verimlilik Dergisi, Ankara:
  13. MPM yayını. Halbesleben, J.R.B., Whitman, M.V. & Crawford, W.S. (2014). A dialectical theory of the decision to go to work: Bringing together absenteeism and presenteeism. Human Resource Management Review, 24, 177–192.
  14. Janssens, H., Clays, E., De Clercq, B., De Bacquer, D., Casini, A., Kittel, F. & Braeck