Journals / Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The reasons of iron chlorosis in plants and removing methods

Bitkilerde demir klorozunun nedenleri ve giderilme yöntemleri

Pages
32–42
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was suggested that Fe efficient and resistant genotypes to chlorosis should be preferred to prevent iron chlorosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil conditions inducing iron chlorosis in plant, characteristics of efficient and inefficient plants in Fe uptake, physiological changes in plant roots emerging due to Fe stress and biochemical functions of iron were revealed in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also, the role of active Fe in iron uptake by plants, indications of chlorosis depend on iron, removing methods and genetic control of iron chlorosis were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was suggested that Fe efficient and resistant genotypes to chlorosis should be preferred to prevent iron chlorosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bitki · demir · kloroz

Abstract

Soil conditions inducing iron chlorosis in plant, characteristics of efficient and inefficient plants in Fe uptake, physiological changes in plant roots emerging due to Fe stress and biochemical functions of iron were revealed in this study. Also, the role of active Fe in iron uptake by plants, indications of chlorosis depend on iron, removing methods and genetic control of iron chlorosis were investigated. It was suggested that Fe efficient and resistant genotypes to chlorosis should be preferred to prevent iron chlorosis.

Özet

Bu çalışmada bitkilerde demir (Fe) klorozuna neden olan toprak şartları, Fe alımında etkin ve etkin olmayan bitkilerin özellikleri, bitki köklerinde demir stresine bağlı olarak ortaya çıkan fizyolojik değişiklikler ve demirin biyokimyasal fonksiyonları ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca bitkilerin Fe alımında aktif demirin rolü, demire bağlı klorozun belirtileri, giderilme yöntemleri ve Fe noksanlığının genetik kontrolü incelenmiştir. Bitkilerde demir klorozu görülmemesi için Fe etkin ve kloroza dayanıklı genotiplerin tercih edilmesi gerektiği önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HORUZ, A., KORKMAZ, A., AKINOĞLU, G., BOZ, E. (2016). The reasons of iron chlorosis in plants and removing methods. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 32–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/367865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aktaş M, 1994. Bitki besleme ve toprak verimliliği (2. baskı). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 1361, Ankara, Başar H, 1997. Bitkilerde demir klorozu ve giderilme yöntemleri. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü. s. 124-474 Bergmann W, 1992. Nutritional disorders of plant; Development, Visual and Analytical Diagnosis. p. 223-247. Bienfait HF, 1988. Mechanisms in Fe-efficiency reactions of higher plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 11: 605–629. Brown JC, 1978. Mechanizm of iron uptake by plants. Plant, Cell and Environmental 1: 249-257.
  2. Brown JC, Chaney RL, Ambler JE, 1971. A new tomato mutant inefficient in the transport of iron. Physiologia Plantarum 25(1):48-53
  3. Brown JC, Jolley VD, Mel Lytle C, 1991. Comparative evaluation of iron solubizing substances (phytosiderophores) released by oats and corn; Iron-efficient and iron-inefficient plant. Plant and Soil 130: 157-163. Cinelli F, 1995. Physilogical responses of clonal quince root-stocks to iron-deficiency induced by addition of bicarbonate to nutrient solution. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18(1): 77-89.
  4. Cinelli F, Viti R, 1995. Practial use of root cation exchange capacity as a predictive marker of lime-induced chlorosis tolerance in prunus cerasifera L. Rootstocks. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18 (1): 65-75.
  5. Egmond FV, Aktaş M, 1977. Iron nutritional aspects of ionic balance of plants. Plant and Soil 48, 685-703.
  6. Güneş A, Aktaş M, 1991. Mısır bitkisinde demir noksanlığının giderilmesinde nitrifikasyon inhibisyonunun etkisi. Toprak İlmi Derneği XI. Bilimsel Toplantı Tebliğleri, s. 481-495.
  7. Kacar B, Katkat V, Öztürk Ş, 2010. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Nobel Yayın No:848, Ankara, s. 225-285,
  8. Kacar B, Katkat V, 2009.
  9. Bitki Besleme. Nobel yayınları, Ankara, 659 s Lindsay WL, 1974. Role of chelation in micronutrient availability. The plant Root and Its Environment, Univ. Press of Virginia, pp. 507-524.
  10. Lopez-Millan AF, Morales F, Andaluz A, Gogercena Y, Abadia A, De Lals Rivas J, Abadiz J, 2000. Protective mechanisms in roots of iron deficient sugar beet: changes in carbon assimilation and oxygen use. Plant Physiology 124: 885–897. Machold O, 1968. Effect of nutritional condution on the status of iron in leaves, on the chlophyll content and on the activity of catalase and peroxidase. Flora Ab. A. 159: 1-25. Marschner H, 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd ed. Academic Press,
  11. London. Mengel K, Scherer HW, Malissiovas N, 1979. Chlorosis from the aspects of so