SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Soil losses due to garlic harvesting: A case study Balıkesir –Altıeylül Town

Sarımsak hasatıyla meydana gelen toprak kaybının belirlenmesi: Balıkesir-Altıeylül İlçesi örneği

Mehmet PARLAK
TİMUÇİN EVEREST
Pages
15–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research, it was suggested that soil loss caused by garlic harvest should be taken into account in determining total soil erosion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil erosion generates a threat of soil degradation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Soil erosion exerts threats also on soil conditions, crop yield, biodiversity and human nutrition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research, it was suggested that soil loss caused by garlic harvest should be taken into account in determining total soil erosion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Toprak kaybı · sarımsak · besin madde kayıpları

Abstract

Soil erosion generates a threat of soil degradation. Soil erosion exerts threats also on soil conditions, crop yield, biodiversity and human nutrition. Sustainability of soil resources is influenced by soil loss through harvesting of sugar beet, potato, carrot and garliclike plants. This study was conducted to determine soil loss through garlic harvesting, factors effecting soil loss, quantity and cost of nutrients lost through soil loss. Mean annual soil loss was 3.23 tonnes ha-1 harvest-1 for garlic. 95% of variation in soil loss due to garlic harvesting was explained by gravimetric water content, soil texture, bulk density, lime, organic matter, plant density and garlic yield. Annual cost of nutrient loss through garlic harvesting was calculated as 10.74 dollars ha-1. As a result of the research, it was suggested that soil loss caused by garlic harvest should be taken into account in determining total soil erosion.

Özet

Toprak erozyonu toprak degredasyonuna neden olan tehditlerden birisidir. Toprak erozyonunun toprak koşullarını, bitki verimini, biyoçeşitliliği ve insan beslenmesini tehdit ettiği bilinmektedir. Toprak kaynaklarının sürdürülebilirliğini şeker pancarı, patates, havuç, sarımsak gibi bitkilerin hasatı sırasında oluşan toprak kayıpları etkilemektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı sarımsak hasatının neden olduğu toprak kaybını, kaybı etkileyen faktörleri, kaybolan topraktaki besin maddelerinin miktarını ve maliyetini belirlemektir. Sarımsak hasadı yılda 3.23 ton ha-1 toprak kaybına yol açmaktadır. Sarımsak hasatında toprak kaybındaki değişkenliğin %95’i toprağın nem içeriği, toprak bünyesi, hacim ağırlığı, kireç, organik madde, bitki sıklığı, baş ağırlığı ve sarımsak verimi açıklamıştır. Sarımsak hasatında besin maddesi kayıplarının yıllık maliyeti 10.74 dolar ha-1 olarak tahmin edilmiştir. Sarımsak hasatının neden olduğu toprak kaybı toplam toprak erozyonunun belirlenmesinde dikkate alınmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARLAK, M., EVEREST, T. (2021). Soil losses due to garlic harvesting: A case study Balıkesir –Altıeylül Town. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 15–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/367816

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akan S, 2014. Sarımsak (Allium sativum L.) tüketiminin insan sağlığına yararları. Akademik Gıda 12(2): 95-100.
  2. Berberoglu S, Cilek A, Kirkby M, Irvine B, Donmez C, 2020. Spatial and temporal evaluation of soil erosion in Turkey under climate change scenarios using the Pan European Soil Erosion Risk Assessment (PESERA) model. Environ. Monit. Assess. 192: 491. Bremner JM, 1996. Nitrogen–Total. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods (ed. Sparks DL), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1085–1122.
  3. Dada POO, Adeyanju OR, Adeosun OJ, Adewumi JK, 2016. Effects of soil physical properties on soil loss due to manual yam harvesting under a sandy loam environment. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 4: 121–125. FAO, 2017. FAOSTAT. Data.Crops.http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed 20 November 2019).
  4. Faraji M, Chakan AA, Jafarizadeh M, Behbahani AM, 2017. Soil and nutrient losses due to root crops harvesting: a case study from south western Iran. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 63(11): 1523-1534.
  5. Gee GW, Or D, 2002. Particle size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4, Physical Methods(ed. Dane JH, Topp GC), SSSA, Book Series No: 5, Madison, pp. 255–293.
  6. Grossman RB, Reinsch TG, 2002. Bulk density and linear extensibility: core method. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4, Physical Methods (ed. Dane JH, Topp GC), SSSA, Book Series No: 5, Madison, pp. 201–293.
  7. Helmke PA, Sparks DL, 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and calcium. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3.Chemical Methods (ed. Sparks DL), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 551-574.
  8. Isabirye M, Ruysschaert G, Van Linden L, Poesen J, Magunda MK, Deckers J, 2007. Soil losses due to cassava and sweet potato harvesting: a case study from low input traditional agriculture. Soil Tillage Res. 92: 96-103. Kuo S, 1996. Phosphorus. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and calcium. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods (ed. Sparks DL), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 869 –920. Li Y, Ruysschaert G, Poesen J, Zhang QW, Bai LY, Li L, Sun LF, 2006. Soil losses due to potato and sugar beet harvesting in NE China. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 31: 1003-1016.
  9. Mwango SB, Msanya BM, Mtakwa PW, Kimaro DN, Deckers J, Poesen J, Lilanga S, Sanga R, 2015. Soil loss due to crop harvesting in Usambara Mountains, Tanzania: the case of carrot, onion and potato. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 4(1): 18-28.
  10. Loeppert RH., Suarez DL, 1996. Carbonate and gyps