Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2019 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Frontal QRS-T angle is related with hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with single vessel disease

Pages
194–201
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, we suggest that the results of FFR measurement as an invasive modality can be previously predicted with a simple electrocardiographic evaluation, such as QRSTa. (Anatol J Cardiol 2019; 22: 194-201)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement is used to decide the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery lesion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between QRSTa and coronary FFR measurement in patients with isolated left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis.Methods: A total of 197 patients undergoing FFR measurement for isolated LAD artery stenosis were retrospectively enrolled in the present study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, we suggest that the results of FFR measurement as an invasive modality can be previously predicted with a simple electrocardiographic evaluation, such as QRSTa. (Anatol J Cardiol 2019; 22: 194-201)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement is used to decide the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery lesion. QRS-T angle (QRSTa) is a novel marker of myocardial repolarization abnormality and is affected by obstructive coronary artery disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between QRSTa and coronary FFR measurement in patients with isolated left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis.Methods: A total of 197 patients undergoing FFR measurement for isolated LAD artery stenosis were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. According to FFR value, patients were divided into two groups as 139 patients with normal FFR (>0.80, group 1) and 58 patients with low FFR (≤0.80, group 2). A 12-lead surface electrocardiography of all subjects that had been recorded before performing coronary angiography was evaluated to measure QRSTa, as well as baseline demographic and clinical variables.Results: The mean age of group 2 was significantly higher than that of group 1 (61±11 and 64±11, p=0.044). While there were no differences in heart rate, QRS duration, and corrected QT interval between the two groups, QT interval [377 (359–397) and 379 (367–410), p=0.045] and frontal QRSTa [59 (10–120) and 86 (22–132), p<0.001] were higher in group 2. QT interval [odds ratio (OR)=1.046, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.010–1.084, p=0.012] and frontal QRSTa (OR=1.025, 95% CI=1.010–1.041, p=0.001) were found to be independent predictors of low FFR value in multivariate logistic regression analysis.Conclusion: In the present study, FFR measurement was demonstrated to be correlated with wide QRSTa as a noninvasive and easy method. Thus, we suggest that the results of FFR measurement as an invasive modality can be previously predicted with a simple electrocardiographic evaluation, such as QRSTa. (Anatol J Cardiol 2019; 22: 194-201)

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMAN, S., KALKAN, A. K., TÜRKYILMAZ, A. B., DOĞAN, A. C., AVCI, Y., UZUN, F., ERTÜRK, M. (2019). Frontal QRS-T angle is related with hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with single vessel disease. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 194–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/365284

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/ EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019; 40: 87-165
  2. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al.; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI vs. medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 991-1001
  3. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, et al.; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 213-24
  4. Oehler A, Feldman T, Henrikson CA, Tereshchenko LG. QRS-T angle: a review. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2014; 19: 534-42
  5. Giannopoulos G, Dilaveris P, Batchvarov V, Synetos A, Hnatkova K, Gatzoulis K, et al. Prognostic significance of inverse spatial QRS-T angle circadian pattern in myocardialinfarction survivors. J Electrocardiol 2009; 42: 79-84
  6. Shirota K, Ogino K, Hoshio A, Kasahara T, Kotake H, Endo S, et al. Changes of QRS axis in transient myocardial ischaemia induced by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 1391-5
  7. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Zareba W. QT interval: how to measure it and what is "normal". J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 333-6
  8. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J Koolen JJ, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1703-8
  9. De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1208-17
  10. Scherptong RW, Henkens IR, Man SC, Le Cessie S, Vliegen HW, Draisma HH, et al. Normal limits of the spatial QRST angle and ventricular gradient in 12 lead electrocardiograms of young adults: dependence on sex and heart rate. J Electrocardiol 2008; 41: 648-55
  11. Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S. The grades of ischemia on the presenting electrocardiogram of patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2001; 34 Suppl: 17-26
  12. Gardner PI, Ursell PC, Fenoglio JJ Jr, Wit AL. Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. Circulation 1985; 72: 596–611
  13. Colluoglu T, Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, Ozcan EE, Dursun H, Kaya D. The role of baseline a