SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

The McGrath series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial in obstetric patients

Semih ARICI
Serkan KARAMAN
Serkan DOĞRU
Tuğba KARAMAN
Pages
387–392
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Anesthesiologists have encountered various difficulties in securing the airway.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, we compare the intubation times and hemodynamic changes between the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Laryngoscope · intubation · endotracheal

Abstract

Anesthesiologists have encountered various difficulties in securing the airway. Therefore, we compare the intubation times and hemodynamic changes between the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Materials and methods: A total of 80 obstetric patients were divided into 2 groups, orotracheally intubated with either the McGrath video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation times, Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rates were compared among the groups. Results: Intubation time in the McGrath video laryngoscope group was significantly longer than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group (P < 0.01). The percentage of glottic opening was found to be higher in the McGrath video laryngoscope group (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways.

Özet

Anesthesiologists have encountered various difficulties in securing the airway. Therefore, we compare the intubation times and hemodynamic changes between the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Materials and methods: A total of 80 obstetric patients were divided into 2 groups, orotracheally intubated with either the McGrath video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation times, Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rates were compared among the groups. Results: Intubation time in the McGrath video laryngoscope group was significantly longer than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group (P < 0.01). The percentage of glottic opening was found to be higher in the McGrath video laryngoscope group (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARICI, S., KARAMAN, S., DOĞRU, S., KARAMAN, T. (2014). The McGrath series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial in obstetric patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 387–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/228088

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251–270. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 1269–1277.
  2. Noppens RR, Möbus S, Heid F, Schmidtmann I, Werner C, Piepho T. Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 716–720.
  3. Taylor AM, Peck M, Launcelott S, Hung OR, Law JA, MacQuarrie K, McKenn D, George RB, Ngan J. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 142–147.
  4. Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 116–119.
  5. Piepho T, Weinert K, Heid FM, Werner C, Noppens RR. Comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 and GlideScope® Ranger with the Macintosh laryngoscope by paramedics. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011; 19: 4. Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Case series: The McGrath® videolaryngoscope-an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anesth 2007; 54: 307–313.
  6. Douglas MJ, Preston RL. The obstetric airway: things are seldom as they seem. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 494–498. 11. Erden İA, Pamuk AG, Uzun Ş, Geyik S, Çekirge S, Aypar Ü. Cervical spine movement during intubation using the Airtraq® and direct laryngoscopy. Turk J Med Sci 2010; 40: 299–304.
  7. Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, Hoy C, Lee E, Scott I, McLernon DJ. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 440–445.
  8. Savoldelli GL, Schiffer E, Abegg C, Baeriswyl V, Clergue F, Waeber JL. Comparison of the Glidescope, the McGrath, the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1358–1364.
  9. Jeon WJ, Kim KH, Yeom JH, Bang MR, Hong JB, Cho SY. A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolaryngoscope in paitents. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011; 61: 19–23.
  10. Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Spelten O, Teschendor