Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

It Could Have Been Protected But Wasn’t

Pages
13–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to this, the care for injuries and theprovision of training in which the infection control committee needed to be referred to in situations of injurywas brought to the forefront.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Percutaneous injuries create an occupational risk shared for all health workers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our study aimedto identify the epidemiology of incised wounds that have occurred within the past four years and the effectiveness of preventive measures at the Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine Hospital.Methods: This research was carried out retrospectively with the incised wound cases that occurred at theKSU Faculty of Medicine Hospital between January 1st, 2013 and December 31st, 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to this, the care for injuries and theprovision of training in which the infection control committee needed to be referred to in situations of injurywas brought to the forefront.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Percutaneous injuries create an occupational risk shared for all health workers. Our study aimedto identify the epidemiology of incised wounds that have occurred within the past four years and the effectiveness of preventive measures at the Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine Hospital.Methods: This research was carried out retrospectively with the incised wound cases that occurred at theKSU Faculty of Medicine Hospital between January 1st, 2013 and December 31st, 2016. Health personnel wereexamined in terms of gender, professional job position groups, forms of injury, locations of injury, compliancewith protective barriers used, and precautions taken.Results: The most frequently injured bodily region was the left hand with 122 (51.2%), followed by the righthand with 104 (43.6%). The most frequent injury took place while recapping to cover the tip of a needle with86 (36.0%). No type of protective equipments was used for 169 (71.0%) of the health personnel who wereincluded in the study.Conclusion: That there was high noncompliance with the use of protective equipment revealed that healthworkers needed to be subjected to certain, periodic training. In addition to this, the care for injuries and theprovision of training in which the infection control committee needed to be referred to in situations of injurywas brought to the forefront.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, A., ŞAHİN, A., NAZİK, S., MERCAN, N., KANDİLCİK, H., ATEŞ, S. (2019). It Could Have Been Protected But Wasn’t. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 13–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/365058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Çelik N, Ünal O, Çelik O, Soylu A. Hastanemizdeki sağlıkçalışanlarında dört yıllık kesici delici alet yaralanmalarının değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences 2017
  2. 37(2): 61-7. [CrossRef] 2. Tarantola A, Dominique A, Anne R. Infection risksfollowing accidental exposure to blood or body fluids inhealth care workers: a review of pathogens transmittedin published cases. Am J Infect Control2006
  3. 34(6):367-75. [CrossRef] 3. Tarantola A. Les risques infectieux après accidentexposant au sang ou aux liquides biologiques. Hygiènes2003
  4. 11(2):87-95. 4. Karimi-Sari H, Alavian SM. Needlestick injury againstviral hepatitis elimination. Journal of Hospital Infection2017
  5. 96(4):398. 5. Lavanchy D, Mark K. Global epidemiology of hepatitis Bvirus infection Hepatitis B Virus in Human Diseases.Springer International Publishing 2016
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Global, A.I.D.S. Update UNAIDS Report 2016. (AccessDate: 01 Oct 2018. 7. Rice BD, Tomkins SE, Ncube FM. Sharp Truth: healthcare workers remain at risk of blood borne infection.Occupational Medicine 2015
  7. 65(3):210-4.00. [CrossRef] 8. Leblebicioglu H, Sunbul M, Guner R, Bodur H, Bulut C,Duygu F, et al. Health care-associated Crimean-Congohaemorrhagic fever in Turkey, 2002–2014: a multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study. ClinMicrobiol Infect 2016
  8. 22(4):387. e1-387.e4. [CrossRef] 9. Patel AK, Patel KK, Mehta M, Parikh TM, Toshniwal H, Patel K. First Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic feveroutbreak in India. J Assoc Physicians India 2011
  9. 585–9. 10. Burney MI, Ghafoor A, Saleen M, Webb PA, Casals J. Nosocomial outbreak of viral hemorrhagic fever caused by Crimean hemorrhagic fever–Congo virus in Pakistan,January 1976. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1980
  10. 941–7. [CrossRef] 11. Parlak E, Kosan Z, Ertürk A, Parlak M, Özkut Z. A nosocomial outbreak of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagicfever. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2015
  11. 5–9. [CrossRef] 12. Conger NG, Paolino KM, Osborn EC, Rusnak JM,Günther S, Pool J, et al. Health care response to CCHF in US soldier and nosocomial transmission to health care.Emerg Infect Dis 2015
  12. 23–31. [CrossRef] 13. Green B, Griffiths EC. Psychiatric consequences ofneedlestick injury. Occupational Medicine2013
  13. 63(3):1883-8. [CrossRef] 14. Sharma R, Rasania SK, Verma A, Singh S. Study ofprevalence and responseto needlestick injuries amonghealthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi,India. Indian J Community Med 2010
  14. 35(1):74-7. [CrossRef] 15. Sarı ND, Fincancı M, Soysal HF, Demirkıran N, Koyu