SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Combined Laparoscopic and Fluoroscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Embedded in the Omentum

Çağlar HELVACIOĞLU
Berna Buse KOBAL
Pages
278–280
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If the IUD cannot be visualized during laparoscopy, fluoroscopic imaging can be useful.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A 32-year-old female patient presented with abnormal menstrual bleeding after copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) insertion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Direct abdominal radiograph showed the IUD in the lower abdomen.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If the IUD cannot be visualized during laparoscopy, fluoroscopic imaging can be useful.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

A 32-year-old female patient presented with abnormal menstrual bleeding after copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) insertion. Direct abdominal radiograph showed the IUD in the lower abdomen. Fluoroscopy was required to locate the device embedded in the omentum during laparoscopy. If the IUD cannot be visualized during laparoscopy, fluoroscopic imaging can be useful.

🔖

Cite This Article

HELVACIOĞLU, Ç., KOBAL, B. B. (2021). Combined Laparoscopic and Fluoroscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Embedded in the Omentum. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 278–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/407395

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Banerjee J, Jeelani R, Berman JM, Diamond MP. Missing IUD and utilization of fluoroscopy for management: a case report. Contraception 2012;86(3):285–7
  2. Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, Lahteenmaki P, Heikinheimo O. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Human Reprod 2013;28(6):1546–51
  3. Cheung ML, Rezai S, Jackman JM, Patel ND, Bernaba BZ, Hakimian O, et al. Retained Intrauterine Device (IUD): Triple case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2018;2018:9362962
  4. Zhao Z, Zhang G, Peng P, Li X. Penetration of the gastric wall by an intrauterine device: a case report. Contraception 2021;103(4):282–3
  5. Mulayim B, Mulayim S, Celik NY. A lost intrauterine device. Guess where we found it and how it happened? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2006;11(1):47–9
  6. Korber PE, Goldstein BH. The Management of a patient with a fragmented intrauterine device embedded within the cervical canal. Contraception 2019;99(1):67–9
  7. Zolnierczyk P, Cendrowski K, Sawicki W. Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in the omentum - case report. Int J Womens Health 2015;7:945–8.