Dergiler / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Combined Laparoscopic and Fluoroscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Embedded in the Omentum

Sayfa
278–280
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

If the IUD cannot be visualized during laparoscopy, fluoroscopic imaging can be useful.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A 32-year-old female patient presented with abnormal menstrual bleeding after copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) insertion.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Direct abdominal radiograph showed the IUD in the lower abdomen.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:If the IUD cannot be visualized during laparoscopy, fluoroscopic imaging can be useful.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

A 32-year-old female patient presented with abnormal menstrual bleeding after copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) insertion. Direct abdominal radiograph showed the IUD in the lower abdomen. Fluoroscopy was required to locate the device embedded in the omentum during laparoscopy. If the IUD cannot be visualized during laparoscopy, fluoroscopic imaging can be useful.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HELVACIOĞLU, Ç., KOBAL, B. B. (2021). Combined Laparoscopic and Fluoroscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Embedded in the Omentum. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 278–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/407395

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Banerjee J, Jeelani R, Berman JM, Diamond MP. Missing IUD and utilization of fluoroscopy for management: a case report. Contraception 2012;86(3):285–7
  2. Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, Lahteenmaki P, Heikinheimo O. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Human Reprod 2013;28(6):1546–51
  3. Cheung ML, Rezai S, Jackman JM, Patel ND, Bernaba BZ, Hakimian O, et al. Retained Intrauterine Device (IUD): Triple case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2018;2018:9362962
  4. Zhao Z, Zhang G, Peng P, Li X. Penetration of the gastric wall by an intrauterine device: a case report. Contraception 2021;103(4):282–3
  5. Mulayim B, Mulayim S, Celik NY. A lost intrauterine device. Guess where we found it and how it happened? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2006;11(1):47–9
  6. Korber PE, Goldstein BH. The Management of a patient with a fragmented intrauterine device embedded within the cervical canal. Contraception 2019;99(1):67–9
  7. Zolnierczyk P, Cendrowski K, Sawicki W. Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in the omentum - case report. Int J Womens Health 2015;7:945–8.