SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Determination of Sexual and Reproductive Health Stigmatization Levels of Young Women

Metin YILDIZ
Mehmet Salih YILDIRIM
Güray OKYAR
Pages
254–259
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A positive statistically significant relationship was found betweenthe Sexual and Reproductive Health Stigma Scale subscales Attitudes Based on Stigma and age in young women (r=0.171, p=0.004).Conclusion: The results suggest that the level of stigmatization may vary according to the level of educationand income, and it is recommended to provide training on stigmatizing sexual and reproductive health forthis group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This research was carried out to investigate the sexual and reproductive health stigmatizationlevels of young women.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between 18-24 years old women registered in the FamilyHealth Centers located in Igdir city center between March and April 2020.Results: In this study, the median value of the Sexual and Reproductive Health Stamping Scale was 8.0 [6.0] inyoung women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The median value of "Accepted stigma", "Internalized stigma", "Stigma based attitudes", whichare sub-dimensions of the the Sexual and Reproductive Health Stamping Scale in young women, were foundas 3.0 [3.0], 2.0 [4.0], 3.0 [3.0], respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A positive statistically significant relationship was found betweenthe Sexual and Reproductive Health Stigma Scale subscales Attitudes Based on Stigma and age in young women (r=0.171, p=0.004).Conclusion: The results suggest that the level of stigmatization may vary according to the level of educationand income, and it is recommended to provide training on stigmatizing sexual and reproductive health forthis group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This research was carried out to investigate the sexual and reproductive health stigmatizationlevels of young women.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between 18-24 years old women registered in the FamilyHealth Centers located in Igdir city center between March and April 2020.Results: In this study, the median value of the Sexual and Reproductive Health Stamping Scale was 8.0 [6.0] inyoung women. The median value of "Accepted stigma", "Internalized stigma", "Stigma based attitudes", whichare sub-dimensions of the the Sexual and Reproductive Health Stamping Scale in young women, were foundas 3.0 [3.0], 2.0 [4.0], 3.0 [3.0], respectively. A positive statistically significant relationship was found betweenthe Sexual and Reproductive Health Stigma Scale subscales Attitudes Based on Stigma and age in young women (r=0.171, p=0.004).Conclusion: The results suggest that the level of stigmatization may vary according to the level of educationand income, and it is recommended to provide training on stigmatizing sexual and reproductive health forthis group.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, M., YILDIRIM, M. S., OKYAR, G. (2020). Determination of Sexual and Reproductive Health Stigmatization Levels of Young Women. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 254–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/365020

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. İnanç BY, Bilgin M, Atıcı MK. Gelişim Psikolojisi. 12nd ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2017. p. 1–277
  2. Koluaçık S, Güneş G, Pehlivan E. İnönü Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin üreme sağlığı konularında bilgi düzeyleri ve hizmetten beklentileri. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2010;17:7–14
  3. Koçak DY, Duman NB, Topuz Ş, Yılmazel G, Güngör T, Başçı AB. Üreme çağındaki kadınların acil kontrasepsiyon ile ilgili bilgi, tutum ve davranışları. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi 2016;138(3):112–6
  4. Atan ŞÜ, Duran ET, Şen S, Bolsoy N, Sevil Ü. Üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsellik ve aile planlaması yöntemleri konusundaki bilgi, görüş ve uygulamaları. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakülesi Dergisi 2012;28(1):13–25
  5. WHO. Reproductive health. Available at: http://www.who.int/ topics/reproductive_health/en/. Accessed Apr 20, 2020
  6. Tenore JL, Lipsky MS. Preventive services for the adolescent (13–20 years). Clinics in Family Practice 2000;2:289–311
  7. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2001. Available at: https://www.who.int/ classifications/icf/en/. Accessed Apr 20, 2020
  8. Charlton BM, Hatzenbuehler ML, Jun HJ, Sarda V, Gordon AR, Raifman JR, et al. Structural stigma and sexual orientationrelated reproductive health disparities in a longitudinal cohort study of female adolescents. Journal of adolescence 2019;74,183–7
  9. Goffman E. Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Shuster; 1963. p. 2–52
  10. Cuca YP, Onono M, Bukusi E, Turan JM. Factors associated with pregnant women's anticipations and experiences of HIV-related stigma in rural Kenya. AIDS Care 2012;24(9):1173–80
  11. Hatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG. Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am J Public Health 2013;103(5):813–21
  12. Link BG, Yang LH, Phelan JC, Collins PY. Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophr Bull 2004;30(3):511–41
  13. Atuyambe L, Mirembe F, Johansson A, Kirumira EK, Faxelid E. Experiences of pregnant adolescents--voices from Wakiso district, Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2005;5(4):304–9
  14. Fenton KA. Time for change: rethinking and reframing sexual health in the United States. J Sex Med 2010;7 Suppl 5:250–2
  15. Hall KS, Kusunoki Y, Gatny H, Barber J. Social discrimination, stress, and risk of unintended pregnancy among young women. J Adolesc Health 2015;56(3):330–7
  16. WHO. HIV/AIDS. Addressing stigma and discrimination. Available at: http://www.who.int/hiv/t