SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2018 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

STABILITY ANALYSES FOR DOUBLE CROPPING IN SOYBEAN [(Glycine max L.) Merrill]

Emre ILKER
Mehmet KOCATURK
Abdullah KADIROGLU
Metin ALTINBAS
Aliye YILDIRIM
Gulsum OZTURK
Hakan YILDIZ
Pages
80–84
Publication Date
2018-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If sufficient water is provide (500-700 mm) BATEM 306 and BATEM 317 lines can be grown, otherwise, the other two (BATEM 207 and BATEM 223) can be suitable to grow in the regional conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Double crop agriculture is a great advantage for the coastal Mediterranean climate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ten high-yielding advanced soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] lines and four registered soybean varieties having maturity group III and IV (ARISOY, ATAEM7, BRAVO and NOVA) were evaluated for double cropping in different regions and years (2014, 2015 and 2016 in Izmir-Bornova, 2015 and 2016 in Antalya-Aksu).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If sufficient water is provide (500-700 mm) BATEM 306 and BATEM 317 lines can be grown, otherwise, the other two (BATEM 207 and BATEM 223) can be suitable to grow in the regional conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Double cropping · soybean · stability

Abstract

Double crop agriculture is a great advantage for the coastal Mediterranean climate. Although a number of soybean varieties have been recommended for cultivation, the information on the stability for double cropping is lacking for the agro-climatic conditions of Mediterranean coastal zone. Ten high-yielding advanced soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] lines and four registered soybean varieties having maturity group III and IV (ARISOY, ATAEM7, BRAVO and NOVA) were evaluated for double cropping in different regions and years (2014, 2015 and 2016 in Izmir-Bornova, 2015 and 2016 in Antalya-Aksu). The F test was first applied to check differences of the deviation variances from the zero. In addition, statistics of ecovalance (Wi2 ) and stability variance (σi2 ), estimating the contribution of a genotype to total Genotype x Environmental interaction (GxE), were estimated. As a result of this research, two different conclusions were determined. If sufficient water is provide (500-700 mm) BATEM 306 and BATEM 317 lines can be grown, otherwise, the other two (BATEM 207 and BATEM 223) can be suitable to grow in the regional conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

ILKER, E., KOCATURK, M., KADIROGLU, A., ALTINBAS, M., YILDIRIM, A., OZTURK, G., YILDIZ, H. (2018). STABILITY ANALYSES FOR DOUBLE CROPPING IN SOYBEAN [(Glycine max L.) Merrill]. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 80–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/180931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akcura, M., Y. Kaya, S. Taner, R. Ayranci. 2006. Parametric stability analyses for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Environ. 52 (6): 254–261.
  2. Altinbas, M., H. Sepetoglu. 1994. A study on the stability of grain yield in lentil. The Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ege University 31 (1): 1-8 (in Turkish). Altinbas, M., H. Sepetoglu. 2003. The relationship of performance with adaptation for yield and some agronomic traits of chickpea lines sown in winter. The Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ege University 40 (1): 49-56 (in Turkish). Becker, H.C. 1981. Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 30: 835-840.
  3. Becker, H.C., J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101: 1-23.
  4. Bozoglu, H., A. Gulumser. 2000. Determination of genotype x environment interactions of some agronomic chacters in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 24 (2): 211-220 (in Turkish). Caylak, O., C.F. Caliskan, M.B. Yildirim, N. Algan. 1994. Untersuchungen über die feststellung der anpassungsfähig einiger sojabohnenlinien bzw.-sorten an hand von truncatedauslese methode an klimabedingungen vom Egegebiet.keit Kongress der Feldfrüchte. Band I, 140-144. 25-29
  5. April, Izmir. (auf Türkisch). Eberhart, S.A., W.A. Russel 1966. Stability paremeters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36-40.
  6. Fox, P. N., J. Crossa and I. Romagossa. 1997. Multienvironmental testing and genotype x environment interaction, in Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London, R. A. Kempton and P. N. Fox. (eds.), 117-138
  7. Hossain, M.A., L. Rahman, A.K.M Shamsuddin. 2003. Genotype-environment interaction and stability analysis in soybean. Journal of Biological Sciences 3 (11): 1026-1031.
  8. Ibrahim, K., P. Ruckenbauer. 1987. Stability parameters of important characters in various types of faba bean. FABIS News., 17: 10-13.
  9. Ilker, E. 2017. Performances of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Advanced Lines Grown in Second Cropping under Mediterranean Climatical Conditions of Western Turkey. Turk J Field Crops. 22(1): 104-107. DOI: 10.17557/tjfc.311003. Koraddi, S., G.T. Basavaraja, I. Bhoodi. 2017. Stability analysis in soybean [(Glycine max L.) Merrill]. Int. Journal of Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6 (9): 945-948.
  10. Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns, L.P. Lefkovitch. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26:894-900.
  11. Liu, Z., X. Fan, W. Huang, J. Yang, Y. Zheng, S. Wang, L. Qiu. 2017. Stabi