Journals / TİSK Akademi / 2007 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Organizations: Antecendents and Prevention

Örgütlerde Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları: Belirleyicileri ve Önlenmesi

Pages
146–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, some suggestions about the preventing the counterproductive behaviors are explained.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Organizations: Antecendents and Prevention Last years, it is observed that there is an increase in studies that focused on the nature, causes and effects of counterproductive work behaviors and theoretical explanations of these behaviors are increased as well.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Counterproductive work behaviors are considered in the bad behaviors literature and it is evaluated as an important problem in terms of organizational productivity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, some suggestions about the preventing the counterproductive behaviors are explained.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Organizations: Antecendents and Prevention Last years, it is observed that there is an increase in studies that focused on the nature, causes and effects of counterproductive work behaviors and theoretical explanations of these behaviors are increased as well. Counterproductive work behaviors are considered in the bad behaviors literature and it is evaluated as an important problem in terms of organizational productivity. Besides the economic dimensions resulted from these behaviors and the importance of the lost time because of these behaviors is emphasized. In this study, counterproductive work behaviors is examined in terms of its place in the literature, definition of term, dimensions, antecendents and main theoretical approaches. Finally, some suggestions about the preventing the counterproductive behaviors are explained.

Özet

Son yıllarda, üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarının doğası, nedenleri ve etkilerine odaklanan çalışmalarda bir artış gözlenmekte ve bu tür davranışların kuramsal açıklamaları da giderek çoğalmaktadır. Üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları, olumsuz davranışlar literatüründe ele alınmakta ve örgütün verimliliği açısından önemli bir sorun alanı olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu tür davranışlar nedeniyle uğranılan zararların ekonomik boyutu yanında, kaybedilen zamanı n da önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları, ilgili literatürdeki yeri, tanımlanması, boyutları, belirleyicileri ve belli başlı kuramsal yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde ele alınarak, bu tür davranışları önlemeye yönelik çeşitli önerilerle desteklenmeye çalışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEÇER, H. Ş., SEÇER, B. (2007). Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Organizations: Antecendents and Prevention. TİSK Akademi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 146–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/364653

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Appelbaum, Steven H.; Deguire, Kyle J.; Lay, Mathieu (2005), "The Relationship of Ethical Climate to Deviant Workplace Behaviour", Corporate Governance. Vol: 5(4), s.43-55.
  2. Aquino, Karl; Lewis, Margaret U.; Bradfield, Murray (1999), “Justice Constructs, Negative Affectivity, and Employee Deviance: A Proposed and Empirical Test”, Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol.20, No.7, s. 1073-1091.
  3. Bakırcı Kadriye (2001), “Remedies for Sexual Harassment of Employees under Turkish Law”, European Public Law, Vol:7(3), s.473-484.
  4. Bandura A. (1973), Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Bennett, Rebecca J.; Robinson Sandra L. (2000), "Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance", Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol:85(3), s.349-360. Brown Theresa J.; Sumner, Kenneth E., (2006), "Perceptions and Punishments of Workplace Aggression: The Role of Aggression Content, Context, and Perceiver Variables", Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Vol:36(10), s.2509-2531.
  5. Budak, Selçuk (2003),
  6. Psikoloji Sözlüğü, Bilim ve Sanat Yayını, Ankara.
  7. Canlon, Donald E.; Meyer, Christopher J.; Nowakowski, Jaclyn M. (2005), “How Does Organizational Justice Affect Performance, Withdrawal and Counterproductive Behavior?” içinde Jerald Greenberg/Jason A. Colquitt, Handbook of Organizational Justice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Clarke, David (2003), Pro-social and Anti social Behavior. Routledge. Dawson, Christina Louise (1996), Dispositional and Attitudinal Explanations of Counterproductivity in Workplace”, Yayınlanmamı ş Doktora Tezi, University of California. Dupre, Kathryne E.; Barling, Julian (2003), "Workplace Aggression", (içinde) Eds. Abraham Sagie, Shmuel Stashevsky, Meni Koslowsky, Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations. Palgrave. Evans, Amanda Lea (2005),
  8. Counterproductive Group Behavior, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Şorida Institutte of Technology. Fox, Suzy; Spector, Paul E. (1999), “A Model of Work Frustration-Aggression” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.20, s. 915-931.
  9. Fox, Suzy; Spector Paul E. (2006), “The Many Roles of Control in a Stressor-Emotion Theory of Counterproductive Work Behavior”, Research in Occupational Stres and Well Being, Volume 5, s.171-201.
  10. Fox, Suzy; Spector, Paul E.; Miles Don (2001), "Counterproductive Work Behavior in Response to Job Stressors and Organizational Justice: Some Mediator and Moderator Tests for Autonomy and Emotions", Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol:59, s.291-309. Furnham Adri