Journals / Tanısal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji (Yeni Adı: Dİagnostic & Intervent. Radiol) / 2003 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The role of spiral CT in the preoperative evaluation of malignant gastric neoplasms

Malign mide tümörlerinin preoperatif değerlendirilmesinde spiral BT'nin rolü

Pages
345–353
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The accuracy of spiral CT in overall TNM staging of gastric adenocarcinomas was 67% (16/24).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of spiral CT in preoperative staging in patients with gastric cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 patients with an established diagnosis of 24 gastric adenocarcinoma, 2 gastric lymphoma, 1 carcinoid tumor, 1 leiomyosarcoma were evaluated with spiral CT for serosal invasion, pancreatic invasion, metastasis and peritoneal involvement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The accuracy of spiral CT in overall TNM staging of gastric adenocarcinomas was 67% (16/24).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Neoplazm metastazı · Tomografi · Spiral Bilgisayarlı

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of spiral CT in preoperative staging in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 patients with an established diagnosis of 24 gastric adenocarcinoma, 2 gastric lymphoma, 1 carcinoid tumor, 1 leiomyosarcoma were evaluated with spiral CT for serosal invasion, pancreatic invasion, metastasis and peritoneal involvement. Results were compared with surgical and pathological staging. RESULTS: The accuracy of spiral CT in determining the depth of tumor invasion, pancreatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, liver metastasis and splenic metastasis were 82% (23/28), 96% (27/28), 82% (23/28), 96% (27/28), 100% (28/28) and 100% (28/28) respectively. The differentiation between T2-T3, T3-T4, N0- N1, N1-N2, N2-N3 were possible in 83% (15/18), 92% (23/25), 79% (15/19), 73% (8/11), and 89% (8/9). The accuracy of spiral CT in overall TNM staging of gastric adenocarcinomas was 67% (16/24). CONCLUSION: Spiral CT is an effective tool in the preoperative staging of gastric malignancies.

Özet

AMAÇ Bu çalışmanın amacı mide tümörü olan hastalarda ameliyat öncesinde spiral BT ile evrelemenin değerlendirilmesidir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM 24'ü adenokarsinom, 2'si mide lenfoması, 1'i karsinoid tumor ve 1'i leyomyosarkom teşhisi konulmuş toplam 28 hasta spiral BT ile serozal invazyon, pankreas invazyonu, metastaz ve peritoneal tutulum açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar cerrahi ve patolojik sonuçlarla karşılaştırılmıştır. Spiral BT'nin tümör invazyonu derinliğini, pankreas invazyonunu, lenf nodu metastazlarını, peritoneal metastazları, karaciğer ve dalak metastazlarını saptamadaki doğruluk oranları sırasıyla %82 (23/28), %96 (27/28), %82 (23/28), %96 (27/28), %100 (28/28) ve %100 (28/28)'dür. Spiral BT ile evre T2-T3, T3-T4, N0-N1, N1-N2, N2-N3 tümörlerinin birbirinden ayrımında sırasıyla %83 (15/18), %92 (23/25), %79 (15/19), %73 (8/11) ve %89 (8/9) doğruluk oranları bulundu. Mide adenokarsinomlarında tüm TNM evrelemesinde spiral BT'nin doğruluk oranı %67 (16/24)'dir. SONUÇ Spiral BT mide tümörlerinin preoperatif değerlendirmesinde etkili bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

LAKADAMYALI, H., OTO, A., AKMANGİT, İ., ABBASOĞLU, O., SİVRİ, B., AKHAN, O., BESİM, A. (2003). The role of spiral CT in the preoperative evaluation of malignant gastric neoplasms. Tanısal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji (Yeni Adı: Dİagnostic & Intervent. Radiol), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 345–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/364247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Gore MR. Gastric cancer: Clinical and pat-hologic features. Radiol Clin North Am1997; 35 (2):295-310
  2. Dehn TCB, Reznek RH, Nockler IB, et al.The preoperative assessment of advancedgastric cancer by computed tomography.Br J Surg 1984; 71:413-417
  3. Gore RM, Levine MS, Ghahremani GG, etal. Gastric cancer: Radiologic diagnosis.Radiol Clin North Am 1997; 35:311-329
  4. Balfe DM, Koehler RE, Karstaedt N, et al.Computed tomography of gastric neop-lasms. Radiology 1981; 140:431-436
  5. Cook AO, Levine BA, Sirinek KR, et al.Evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma.Arch Surg 1986; 121:603-606
  6. Sussman SK, Halvorsen RA, İllescas FF, etal. Gastric adenocarcinoma: CT versus sur-gical staging. Radiology 1988; 167:335-340
  7. Kleinhaus ve Militianu. Computed tomog-raphy in the preoperative evaluation ofgastric carcinoma. Gastrointest Radiol1988; 13:97-101
  8. Raptopoulos V, Davis MA, Davidoff A, etal. Fat-density oral contrast agent for abdo-minal CT. Radiology 1987; 164:653-656
  9. D’Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D, Grani M.Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging ofgastric cancer: correlation with pathologi-cal findings. A prospective study of 107cases. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1877-1885
  10. Moss AA, Schnyder P, Marks W, et al.Gastric adenocarcinoma: A comparison ofthe accuracy and economics of staging bycomputed tomography and surgery. Gast-roenterology 1981; 80:45-50
  11. Dorfmann RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH,Sandler MA. Upper abdominal lymph no-des. Criteria for normal size determinedwith CT. Radiology 1991; 180:319-322
  12. Halvorsen RA, Thompson WM. Computedtomographic staging of gastrointestinaltract malignancies Part I. Esophagus andstomach. Invest Radiol 1987; 22:2-16
  13. Fukuya T, Honda H, Kaneko K, et al. Effi-cacy of helical CT in T-staging of gastriccancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:73-80
  14. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral(Helical) CT. Radiology 1993; 189:647-656
  15. Akyar (Şahin) G, Yağc› C, Atasoy Ç, et al.Mide kanserlerinde preoperative değerlen-dirmede bilgisayarl› tomografinin değeri.Tan›sal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji 1996;2:46-53
  16. Raptopoulos V, Davis MA, Davidoff A, etal. Fat-density oral contrast agent for abdo-minal CT. Radiology 1987; 164:653-656
  17. D’Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D, Grani M.Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging ofgastric cancer: correlation with pathologi-cal findings. A prospective study of 107cases. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1877-1885
  18. Dong HL, Young TK, Seong JP, Joo WL.Comparison of hydro-US and spiral CT inthe stagin