Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2009 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the effects of general and combined spinal epidural anaesthesia on maternal and newborn in caesarean section operations

Sezaryen operasyonlarında genel anestezi ve kombine spinal epidural anestezinin anne ve yenidoğan üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
149–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In both groups, there were no significant differences in APGAR scores and umblical vein blood gas analyses of newborns Conclusion: We concluded that; the effects of general anaesthesia and combined spinal epidural anaesthesia were similar on parturients and newborns in caesarean section operations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to compare the effects of general anaesthesia versus combined spinal epidural anaesthesia on maternal haemodynamic variables and APGAR scores and umblical vein blood gas parameter of newboms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study design: After the approval from Medical Ethics Committee and written informed consent, 30 parturients undergoing caesarean section operation, randomly allocated to receive either general anaesthesia (in Group GA) (n:15) or combined spinal epidural anaesthesia (Group CSEA) (n:15) were included the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In both groups, there were no significant differences in APGAR scores and umblical vein blood gas analyses of newborns Conclusion: We concluded that; the effects of general anaesthesia and combined spinal epidural anaesthesia were similar on parturients and newborns in caesarean section operations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sezaryen · Anestezi · obstetrik

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare the effects of general anaesthesia versus combined spinal epidural anaesthesia on maternal haemodynamic variables and APGAR scores and umblical vein blood gas parameter of newboms. Study design: After the approval from Medical Ethics Committee and written informed consent, 30 parturients undergoing caesarean section operation, randomly allocated to receive either general anaesthesia (in Group GA) (n:15) or combined spinal epidural anaesthesia (Group CSEA) (n:15) were included the study. Non invasive arterial blood pressure, heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation values were recorded before anaesthesia (baseline) and thereafter with 5 min intervals until at the end of surgical procedure. Following delivery, a segment of the umblical cord was doubtly clamped and umblical vein blood gas samples were taken and APGAR scores were recorded at 1 and 5 min. Results: Mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) values were significantly higher in Group CSEA compared to Group GA at 5th min (p<0.05). In the changes in MBP and HR values no treatment were required clinically in groups. In both groups, there were no significant differences in APGAR scores and umblical vein blood gas analyses of newborns Conclusion: We concluded that; the effects of general anaesthesia and combined spinal epidural anaesthesia were similar on parturients and newborns in caesarean section operations.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda; sezaryen operasyonlarında genel anestezi ile kombine spinal epidural anestezinin, gebelerdeki hemodinamik değişiklikler ve yenidoğanın APGAR skorları ile göbek kordonu venöz kan gazlarına etkilerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastane Etik Kurulu izni ve yazılı onamları alınan, sezaryen operasyonu planlanan 30 miadında gebe, rasgele olarak genel anestezi (Grup GA) (n:15) veya kombine spinal epidural anestezi (Grup KSE) (n:15) grubuna dahil edildi. Non invaziv arteryel kan basıncı, kalp atım hızı ve periferik oksijen satürasyonu anesteziden önce (bazal değer) ve devamında cerrahi sonuna kadar 5 dk. aralıklarla ölçülerek kaydedildi. Doğumdan sonra göbek kordonunun bir bölümü klampe edilerek alınan umblikal ven kan örneğinde, kan gazı değerleri ile 1 ve 5. dk APGAR skorlarına bakıldı. Bulgular: Gruplararası karşılaştırmada ortalama kan basıncı (OKB) ve kalp atım hızı (KAH), 5.dk.da Grup KSE’de Grup GA’ya göre anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu (p<0.05). Grup içi OKB ve KAH değerlerinde klinik olarak tedaviye ihtiyaç duyulmayan değişiklikler saptandı. Her iki grupta APGAR skorları ve umblikal ven kan gazı değerlerinde anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: Sezaryen operasyonlarında genel anestezi ile kombine spinal epidural anestezi, gebede ve yenidoğanda oluşturdukları etkileri bakımından benzer olarak değerlendirildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, H. F., HANCI, A., EKŞİOĞLU, B., SİVRİKAYA, G. U., EROL, M. K. (2009). Comparison of the effects of general and combined spinal epidural anaesthesia on maternal and newborn in caesarean section operations. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 149–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/363496

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. McDonnell NJ, Poech MJ, Clauisi DM, Scott KL: Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anesthesia: An observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anesthesia for cesarean section obstetric anesthesia. Obstet Anesth Dig 2009; 29:156-7
  2. Vasdeu GM, Harrison BA, Keegan MT, Burkle CM: Management of the difficult and failed airway in obstetric anesthesia. J Anesth 2008; 22:38-48
  3. Hawthorne I, Wilson R, Lyons G, Dresner M: Failed intubation revisited: 17- year experience in a teaching maternity unit. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76:680-4
  4. Gillett GB, Watson JD, Langford RM: Ranitidine and single-dose antacid therapy as prophylaxis against acid aspiration syndrome in obstetric practice. Anaesthesia 1998; 39:638-44
  5. Hey VM, Ostick DG: Metoclopramide and the gastro-oesophageal sphincter. A study in pregnant women with heart-burn. Anaesthesia 1978; 33:462-65
  6. Dyer Ra, Farina Z, Joubert IA, et al: Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal anesthesia (coload)for elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32:351-7
  7. Crowhurst J, Birnbach DJ: Low dose neuroaxial block. Heading towards the new millennium. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:241-42
  8. Stienstra R, Dilrozun-Alhadi BZ, Dahan A, van Cleef JW, Veering BT, Burm AG: The epidural "top-up" in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: The effect of volume versus dose. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 810-4
  9. Rawal N, van Zundert A, Holmström B, Crowhorst JA: Combined spinal-epidural technique. Reg Anesth 1997; 22:406-423
  10. Emmett RS, Cyna AM, Andrew M, et al: Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Sust Rev 3 CD002251, 2002
  11. Tsen LC, Boosalis P, Segal S, Data S, Bader AM: Hemodynamic effects of simultaneous administration of intravenous ephedrine and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. JClin Anesth 2000; 12: 378-82
  12. Thorp JA, Trobough T, Evans R, Hedric J, Yeast JD: The effect of maternal oxygen administration during the second stage of labor on umblical cord blood gas values: A randomized controlled prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 465-74
  13. Dildy GA, van den Berg PP, Katz M, et al: Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: Fetal oxygen saturation trends during labor and relation to delivery outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 679-84
  14. Kolatat T, Somboonnanonda A, Yertakyamanee Y, Chinachot T, Tritrakarn T, Muangkasem J: Effects of gen